Talkers account for listener and channel characteristics to communicate efficiently
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Susan M. Garnsey,et al. Knowledge of Grammar, Knowledge of Usage: Syntactic Probabilities Affect Pronunciation Variation , 2004 .
[2] A. Fernald,et al. Expanded Intonation Contours in Mothers' Speech to Newborns. , 1984 .
[3] J. Elman,et al. Why is that? Structural prediction and ambiguity resolution in a very large corpus of English sentences , 2006, Cognition.
[4] Keith Johnson,et al. Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech , 2012 .
[5] Susan M. Garnsey,et al. That Sounds Unlikely: Syntactic Probabilities Affect Pronunciation , 2006 .
[6] R. Gerrig,et al. The impact of memory demands on audience design during language production , 2005, Cognition.
[7] Uriel Cohen Priva. Using Information Content to PredictPhone Deletion , 2008 .
[8] G. Altmann,et al. Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference , 1999, Cognition.
[9] Roger P. G. van Gompel,et al. Producing Pronouns and Definite Noun Phrases: Do Speakers Use the Addressee's Discourse Model? , 2012, Cogn. Sci..
[10] Matthew P. Aylett,et al. Referential form, word duration, and modelling the listener in spoken dialogue , 2004 .
[11] R. Ferrer i Cancho,et al. Zipf's law from a communicative phase transition , 2005 .
[12] M. Brent,et al. The role of exposure to isolated words in early vocabulary development , 2001, Cognition.
[13] Maria Uther,et al. Do you speak E-NG-L-I-SH? A comparison of foreigner- and infant-directed speech , 2007, Speech Commun..
[14] Roger Levy,et al. Speakers optimize information density through syntactic reduction , 2006, NIPS.
[15] Moreno I. Coco,et al. Scan pattern in visual scenes predict Sentence production , 2010 .
[16] Núria Esteve-Gibert,et al. Prosodic structure shapes the temporal realization of intonation and manual gesture movements. , 2013, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[17] Melissa Baese-Berk,et al. Phonological Neighborhood Effects in Spoken Word Production: An fMRI Study , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[18] Victor S. Ferreira,et al. Seeking predictions from a predictive framework , 2013, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[19] Björn Lindblom,et al. Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory , 1990 .
[20] Julie C. Sedivy,et al. Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .
[21] A. Anderson,et al. The Effects of Visibility on Dialogue and Performance in a Cooperative Problem Solving Task , 1994 .
[22] E. Bard,et al. Controlling the Intelligibility of Referring Expressions in Dialogue , 2000 .
[23] 付伶俐. 打磨Using Language,倡导新理念 , 2014 .
[24] Anna L. Theakston,et al. The effect of perceptual availability and prior discourse on young children's use of referring expressions , 2006, Applied Psycholinguistics.
[25] J. M. Pickett,et al. Effects of Vocal Force on the Intelligibility of Speech Sounds , 1956 .
[26] Valter Ciocca,et al. Perceptual correlates of Cantonese tones , 2007, J. Phonetics.
[27] B. Hommel,et al. How Task Goals Mediate the Interplay between Perception and Action , 2013, Front. Psychol..
[28] T. Florian Jaeger,et al. Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.
[29] S. Gould,et al. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.
[30] M. Papoušek,et al. Tone and intonation in Mandarin babytalk to presyllabic infants: Comparison with registers of adult conversation and foreign language instruction , 1991, Applied Psycholinguistics.
[31] George Kingsley Zipf,et al. Human behavior and the principle of least effort , 1949 .
[32] Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al. To Name or to Describe: Shared Knowledge Affects Referential Form , 2012, Top. Cogn. Sci..
[33] Stefan Kopp,et al. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 2013 .
[34] Steven T Piantadosi,et al. Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[35] Sang Joon Kim,et al. A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .
[36] Sunil J Rao,et al. Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis , 2003 .
[37] Julie C. Sedivy,et al. Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation , 1999, Cognition.
[38] Matthew Goldrick,et al. Mechanisms of interaction in speech production , 2009, Language and cognitive processes.
[39] S. Brennan,et al. Addressees' needs influence speakers' early syntactic choices , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[40] R. Gerrig,et al. Speakers’ experiences and audience design: knowing when and knowing how to adjust utterances to addressees☆ , 2002 .
[41] Benjamin Van Durme,et al. Biases in Predicting the Human Language Model , 2014, ACL.
[42] Chigusa Kurumada,et al. Communicative efficiency in language production: Optional case-marking in Japanese , 2015 .
[43] T. Jaeger,et al. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society , 2008 .
[44] T. Vance,et al. Tonal Distinctions in Cantonese , 1977, Phonetica.
[45] Dmitrii Manin,et al. Experiments on predictability of word in context and information rate in natural language , 2006, ArXiv.
[46] Gary S. Dell,et al. Mechanisms for Listener-Adaptation in Language Production: Limiting the Role of the "Model of the Listener" , 2013 .
[47] Siobhan Chapman. Logic and Conversation , 2005 .
[48] Ramon Ferrer-i-Cancho,et al. Constant conditional entropy and related hypotheses , 2013, ArXiv.
[49] J. Bresnan,et al. Syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation variation in spontaneous speech , 2009, Language and Cognition.
[50] R. Baayen,et al. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .
[51] Victor S. Ferreira,et al. The persistence of optional complementizer production: Why saying “that” is not saying “that” at all , 2003 .
[52] Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al. Producing Less Preferred Structures: More Gestures, Less Fluency , 2009 .
[53] Christo Kirov,et al. The Specificity of Online Variation in Speech Production , 2012, CogSci.
[54] Jennifer M. Roche,et al. The resolution of ambiguity during conversation: More than mere mimicry? , 2010 .
[55] William D. Raymond,et al. The Buckeye corpus of conversational speech: labeling conventions and a test of transcriber reliability , 2005, Speech Commun..
[56] B. Keysar,et al. When do speakers take into account common ground? , 1996, Cognition.
[57] Jason M. Brenier,et al. Predictability Effects on Durations of Content and Function Words in Conversational English , 2009 .
[58] G. Dell,et al. Adapting production to comprehension: The explicit mention of instruments , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.
[59] Yuan Zhao,et al. The effect of lexical frequency and Lombard reflex on tone hyperarticulation , 2009, J. Phonetics.
[60] Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al. From Minor Mishap to Major Catastrophe: Lexical Choice in Miscommunication , 2013, CogSci.
[61] H. H. Clark,et al. Hearers and speech acts , 1982 .
[62] T. Jaeger,et al. Production preferences cannot be understood without reference to communication , 2013, Front. Psychol..
[63] R. Harald Baayen,et al. Predicting the dative alternation , 2007 .
[64] Volker Strom,et al. Visual prosody: facial movements accompanying speech , 2002, Proceedings of Fifth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face Gesture Recognition.
[65] G. Dell,et al. Effect of Ambiguity and Lexical Availability on Syntactic and Lexical Production , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.
[66] Ciocca,et al. Acoustic analysis of lexical tone contrasts in dysarthria , 2000 .
[67] Julie C. Sedivy,et al. Using eye movements to study spoken language comprehension: Evidence for visually mediated incremental interpretation. , 1996 .
[68] Jean-Claude Junqua,et al. The influence of acoustics on speech production: A noise-induced stress phenomenon known as the Lombard reflex , 1996, Speech Commun..
[69] Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al. Contextual confusability leads to targeted hyperarticulation , 2014, CogSci.
[70] C. Anton Rytting,et al. Segmenting words from natural speech: subsegmental variation in segmental cues. , 2010, Journal of child language.
[71] Mark Steedman,et al. The NXT-format Switchboard Corpus: a rich resource for investigating the syntax, semantics, pragmatics and prosody of dialogue , 2010, Lang. Resour. Evaluation.
[72] V. Ferreira. Ambiguity, Accessibility, and a Division of Labor for Communicative Success. , 2008, Learning and motivation.
[73] Kiwako Ito,et al. Anticipatory effects of intonation: Eye movements during instructed visual search. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.
[74] Noam Chomsky,et al. Evolution, brain, and the nature of language , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[75] Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al. The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework , 2003 .
[76] David I. Beaver,et al. Lexical Variation in Relativizer Frequency , 2009 .
[77] Scott Seyfarth,et al. Word informativity influences acoustic duration: Effects of contextual predictability on lexical representation , 2014, Cognition.
[78] R. Catrambone,et al. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 2010 .
[79] Reiko Mazuka,et al. The multidimensional nature of hyperspeech: Evidence from Japanese vowel devoicing , 2014, Cognition.
[80] Chigusa Kurumada,et al. Communicatively efficient language production and case-marker omission in Japanese , 2013, CogSci.
[81] Victor Kuperman,et al. of construction probability on word durations during spontaneous incremental sentence production , 2012 .
[82] R. H. Bernacki,et al. Effects of noise on speech production: acoustic and perceptual analyses. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[83] Janet F. Werker,et al. A cross-language investigation of infant preference for infant-directed communication☆ , 1994 .
[84] Alice Turk,et al. The Smooth Signal Redundancy Hypothesis: A Functional Explanation for Relationships between Redundancy, Prosodic Prominence, and Duration in Spontaneous Speech , 2004, Language and speech.
[85] S. Brennan,et al. Attenuating Information in Spoken Communication: For the Speaker, or for the Addressee?. , 2010 .