Distance Is Not Dead: Social Interaction and Geographical Distance in the Internet Era

The Internet revolution has made long-distance communication dramatically faster, easier, and cheaper than ever before. This, it has been argued, has decreased the importance of geographic proximity in social interactions, transforming our world into a global village with a borderless society. We argue for the opposite: while technology has undoubtedly increased the overall level of communication, this increase has been most pronounced for local social ties. We show that the volume of electronic communications is inversely proportional to geographic distance, following a Power Law. We directly study the importance of physical proximity in social interactions by analyzing the spatial dissemination of new baby names. Counter-intuitively, and in line with the above argument, the importance of geographic proximity has dramatically increased with the internet revolution.

[1]  B. Mandelbrot New Methods in Statistical Economics , 1963, Journal of Political Economy.

[2]  Etienne Huens,et al.  Geographical dispersal of mobile communication networks , 2008, 0802.2178.

[3]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[4]  Wentian Li,et al.  Zipf's law in importance of genes for cancer classification using microarray data. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  What Do We Know about Proximity and Distance in Work Groups? A Legacy of Research , 2002 .

[6]  M. Newman Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law , 2005 .

[7]  Yuen Ren Chao,et al.  Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology , 1950 .

[8]  R. Axtell Zipf Distribution of U.S. Firm Sizes , 2001, Science.

[9]  Leo Egghe,et al.  The exact place of Zipf's and Pareto's law amongst the classical informetric laws , 2005, Scientometrics.

[10]  D. Watts,et al.  An Experimental Study of Search in Global Social Networks , 2003, Science.

[11]  Hawoong Jeong,et al.  Modeling the Internet's large-scale topology , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Howard L. Kingsley An Experimental Study of 'Search' , 1932 .

[13]  Jasmine Novak,et al.  Geographic routing in social networks , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[14]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Globalization, borderless worlds, and the Tower of Babel , 1995 .

[15]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[16]  Rodney Dobell,et al.  Preface to the Symposium on Public Management in a Borderless Economy: National Governments in a World of Trans-national Networks , 1993 .

[17]  P. M. Shearer,et al.  Zipf Distribution of U . S . Firm Sizes , 2022 .

[18]  K. Ruhleder,et al.  Globalization and the Tower of Babel , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[19]  W. Powell,et al.  Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[21]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[22]  X. Gabaix Zipf's Law for Cities: An Explanation , 1999 .

[23]  Ali Farazmand,et al.  Globalization and Public Administration , 1999 .