High precision positioning control for SPM based nanomanipulation: A robust adaptive model reference control approach

Scanning probe microscope (SPM) based nanomanipulations have been successfully applied to various fields to explore and study the unique structures and properties in the nano world. SPM has the ability to manipulate nanoparticles and modify a sample surface in nano scale. Therefore, the positioning accuracy of the SPM probe is the crucial for nanomanipulations. In general, the precision of SPM based nanomanipulations has been limited mainly by hysteresis, creep and drift of the piezo actuator. In this research, a new control strategy named hysteresis creep inverse based robust adaptive model reference control (RAMRC) is proposed to reduce the hysteresis, creep and system drift of the SPM scanner for improving the positioning accuracy of nanomanipulations. The RAMRC approach uses a compensator to compensate the hysteresis and creep. In addition, to tackle the unknown drift, the RAMRC also has a robust adaptive controller to explicitly deals with the noise and disturbance. This is suitable for manipulating nano-objects in a noisy environment, which is difficult for fixed operators/parameters based compensators and controllers. Additionally, the numerical experimental results support the RAMRC theory well and the position error can be controlled within approximate ten nanometers based on simulation results.

[1]  Ning Xi,et al.  Analysis of keratinocytes stiffness after desmosome disruption using Atomic Force Microscopy based nanomanipulation , 2009, 2009 9th IEEE Conference on Nanotechnology (IEEE-NANO).

[2]  Ning Xi,et al.  Analysis and design of carbon nanotube based field effect transistors for nano infrared sensors , 2010, 2010 IEEE Nanotechnology Materials and Devices Conference.

[3]  N. Xi,et al.  Cellular-Level Surgery Using Nano Robots , 2012, Journal of laboratory automation.

[4]  Mu-Tian Yan,et al.  Hysteresis compensation and adaptive controller design for a piezoceramic actuator system in atomic force microscopy , 2009, 2009 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics.

[5]  Philippe Lutz,et al.  Complete Open Loop Control of Hysteretic, Creeped, and Oscillating Piezoelectric Cantilevers , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[6]  Wenlin Chen,et al.  A novel discrete adaptive sliding-mode-like control method for ionic polymer–metal composite manipulators , 2013 .

[7]  Li-Min Zhu,et al.  Modeling and Compensation of Asymmetric Hysteresis Nonlinearity for Piezoceramic Actuators With a Modified Prandtl–Ishlinskii Model , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[8]  Bo Song,et al.  On-line sensing and visual feedback for atomic force microscopy (AFM) based nano-manipulations , 2010, 2010 IEEE Nanotechnology Materials and Devices Conference.

[9]  Micky Rakotondrabe,et al.  Bouc–Wen Modeling and Inverse Multiplicative Structure to Compensate Hysteresis Nonlinearity in Piezoelectric Actuators , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[10]  Han Ding,et al.  Motion Control of Piezoelectric Positioning Stages: Modeling, Controller Design, and Experimental Evaluation , 2013, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[11]  Ning Xi,et al.  Development of Infrared Detectors Using Single Carbon-Nanotube-Based Field-Effect Transistors , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[12]  Aristides A. G. Requicha,et al.  Compensation of Scanner Creep and Hysteresis for AFM Nanomanipulation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[13]  Ian R. Petersen,et al.  Creep, Hysteresis, and Cross-Coupling Reduction in the High-Precision Positioning of the Piezoelectric Scanner Stage of an Atomic Force Microscope , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[14]  Ning Xi,et al.  Video Rate Atomic Force Microscopy: Use of compressive scanning for nanoscale video imaging , 2013, IEEE Nanotechnology Magazine.