An expert system approach to art psychotherapy

Abstract This paper proposes an expert system as a solution to the empirical, heuristic and subjective nature of current art psychotherapy methods. We introduce the framework of the expert system, including its design, knowledge acquisition, representation methods, and modeling of human reasoning process of diagnosis. We discuss the software development environment, menu, and functions of the system, and provide the steps of its application. The user interface makes it possible for non-experts such as parents and teachers to utilize this system in ascertaining signs of their children's psychological problems at an early stage. In addition, this system makes use of many kinds of advantages computers can offer, with the result that diagnosing is done with explicit standards in a more effective way. In the process of unifying existing theories in a systematic manner, this system can foster art psychotherapy research. Finally, this paper attempts to prove the expert system's suitability and usefulness in art psychotherapy through a case study.

[1]  Ferguson Anderson,et al.  Contemporary Social Gerontology , 1977 .

[2]  M. Veltman,et al.  Pictures in the classroom: can teachers and mental health professionals identify maltreated children's drawings? , 2000 .

[3]  L. Pelco,et al.  The psychological evaluation of child sexual abuse using the Louisville Behavior Checklist and Human Figure Drawing. , 1993, Child abuse & neglect.

[4]  Roger E. Sanders,et al.  ODBC 3.5 developer's guide , 1998 .

[5]  Di Leo,et al.  Young children and their drawings , 1970 .

[6]  Gary Riley,et al.  Expert Systems: Principles and Programming , 2004 .

[7]  Rachel Lev–Wiesel,et al.  The effects of social status upon the self concept of elderly widows and wives assessed by human figure drawings , 2000 .

[8]  Glyn V. Thomas,et al.  An Introduction to the Psychology of Children's Drawings , 1989 .

[9]  Vitali Skriptchenko Gregorian,et al.  Colors of disaster: The psychology of the “Black Sun”☆ , 1996 .

[10]  D. Cicchetti,et al.  Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. , 1981, American journal of mental deficiency.

[11]  P. Hartwich,et al.  Computer-based art therapy with inpatients: Acute and chronic schizophrenics and borderline cases☆ , 1997 .

[12]  Adobe Creative Team.  Adobe Photoshop 6.0 Classroom in a Book , 1998 .

[13]  Helena Znaniecka Lopata,et al.  Current Widowhood: Myths and Realities , 1996 .

[14]  Neil C. Rowe.  Artificial intelligence through Prolog , 1988 .

[15]  Seong In Kim,et al.  An expert system to facilitate the uniform administration of justice in criminal cases , 1992 .

[16]  Bel G. Raggad,et al.  Expert System Quality Control , 1996, Inf. Process. Manag..

[17]  F. Pasley,et al.  An Introduction to the Psychology of Children's Drawing , 1992 .

[18]  Edward H. Shortliffe,et al.  The Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence , 1990 .

[19]  Vija B. Lusebrink,et al.  Kinetic Family Drawing scoring method for cross-cultural studies 3 3 The authors wish to thank Fran , 2000 .

[20]  Daniel Rodríguez,et al.  Adobe Photoshop 7 , 2002 .

[21]  Z W Wanderer,et al.  Validity of clinical judgments based on human figure drawings. , 1969, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[22]  M. Veltman,et al.  An evaluation of favorite kind of day drawings from physically maltreated and non-maltreated children. , 2000, Child abuse & neglect.

[23]  Anne Coseo.  Developing cultural awareness for creative arts therapists , 1997 .

[24]  R. H. Alschuler,et al.  Painting and Personality: A Study of Young Children@@@Art for Preadolescents , 1974 .

[25]  Kevin D. Browne,et al.  Trained raters’ evaluation of Kinetic Family Drawings of physically abused children , 2003 .

[26]  H Z Lopata.  Widows as a minority group. , 1971, The Gerontologist.

[27]  M. Trowbridge.  Graphic indicators of sexual abuse in children's drawings: A review of the literature , 1995 .