Serious games for expertise training: Rules in questions

We propose the Architecture for Representations, Games, Interactions, and Learning among Experts (ARGILE) for participatory and knowledge - intensive serious games. Faced with the problem of training in the areas of advanced expertise and practices, reference knowledge is neither stabilized nor unanimous, but rather dynamic and continuously evolving. Moreover, the expert does not make decisions based on pre-established recipes, but it is brought to trial and error, to discuss with peers and to discover solutions in complex situations that are proposed. That's why the rules and the game objects must be easily annotated, discussed and modified by trainers and players themselves. We present in this paper a methodology, tools and technical architecture to design, use and evaluate such serious games. ARGILE allows ensuring the participatory design of the game's rule and involving debate among designers. We illustrate concretely the ideas presented on two examples related to ongoing projects which uses this architecture for the transmission of complex ideas in sustainability (Defismed project), and for training in action in a crisis situation (Aidcrisis project).

[1]  Thomas Herrmann,et al.  Semistructured Models are Surprisingly Useful for User-Centered Design , 2000, COOP.

[2]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[3]  Jean-Pierre Cahier,et al.  Document and item-based modeling: a hybrid method for a socio-semantic web , 2010, DocEng '10.

[4]  Gonzalo Frasca,et al.  Videogames of the oppressed :videogames as a means for critical thinking and debate , 2001 .

[5]  Manuel Zacklad,et al.  Communities of action: a cognitive and social approach to the design of CSCW systems , 2003, GROUP '03.

[6]  Eric Sanchez,et al.  Jeux sérieux et pédagogie universitaire : de la conception à l’évaluation des apprentissages , 2011 .

[7]  Carlo Fabricatore,et al.  Learning and Videogames: an Unexploited Synergy , 2000 .

[8]  Nada Matta,et al.  Representing Experience on Road Accident Management , 2012, 2012 IEEE 21st International Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises.

[9]  李耀华,et al.  Continuum:越多元,越精彩 , 2011 .

[10]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition , 1986 .

[11]  James Paul Gee,et al.  Looking where the light is bad: Video games and the future of assessment , 2010 .

[12]  Patrice Torguet,et al.  Vers un jeu sérieux pour enseigner la programmation , 2008 .

[13]  Rainer Malaka Entertainment Computing , 2014, Informatik-Spektrum.

[14]  Simon Richir,et al.  Serious gaming: From learning experience towards User Experience , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Technology Management Conference (ICE).

[15]  Azizah Jaafar,et al.  Using educational games in learning introductory programming: A pilot study on students' perceptions , 2010, 2010 International Symposium on Information Technology.

[16]  M. Riel Cross-Classroom Collaboration in Global Learning Circles , 1994 .

[17]  Chao Zhou,et al.  Web 2.0, serious game: Structuring knowledge for participative and educative representations of the city , 2011 .

[18]  P. Ehn,et al.  Participatory Design and the Collective Designer , 2002 .

[19]  J. Cahier,et al.  Beyond Web 2.0 … and Beyond the Semantic Web , 2010 .

[20]  Richard Blunt,et al.  Do Serious Games Work? Results from Three Studies , 2009, ELERN.