Hydrate formation and deposition in a gas-dominant flowloop: Initial studies of the effect of velocity and subcooling

Abstract Gas hydrate formation is a critical flow assurance risk in oil and gas production, as remediation of blockages may require weeks of operating downtime and represent a significant safety hazard. While many studies over the past two decades have focused on quantifying hydrate blockage risk in crude oil systems, there is a dearth of information available with which to assess hydrate growth rate or blockage severity in natural gas systems, which typically operate between stratified and annular flow regimes. In this investigation, a single-pass gas-dominant flowloop was used to measure hydrate growth and particle deposition rates with variable liquid holdup (1–10 vol%) and subcooling (1–20 °C). A particular focus of this study was the impact of reducing the gas phase velocity to achieve lower liquid entrainment and, therefore, decrease hydrate formation rate. Reducing the gas velocity from 8.7 to 4.6 m/s at a constant subcooling around 6 °C reduced the total formation rate by a factor of six. At these conditions, the sensitivity of hydrate formation rate to velocity was about 40 times greater than the sensitivity to subcooling. This reduction in gas velocity also halved the estimated rate of hydrate deposition on the pipeline wall. Finally, new observations of hydrate wash-out are reported, whereby significant localized hydrate deposits were effectively removed by modulating the subcooling of the flowloop wall from 6 °C to 3.5 °C. The results provide new insight to inform the next generation of predictive hydrate growth and deposition models for gas-dominant flowlines.

[1]  Nicolas Kalogerakis,et al.  Kinetics of gas hydrate formation from mixtures of methane and ethane , 1987 .

[2]  James P. Brill,et al.  A Study of Two-Phase Flow in Inclined Pipes , 1973 .

[3]  M. Liberatore,et al.  Rheological properties of methane hydrate slurries formed from AOT + water + oil microemulsions. , 2013, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[4]  E. D. Sloan,et al.  Predicting Hydrate Blockages in Oil, Gas and Water-Dominated Systems , 2012 .

[5]  Abbas Firoozabadi,et al.  Driving force for crystallization of gas hydrates , 2002 .

[6]  Michael L. Johns,et al.  Underinhibited Hydrate Formation and Transport Investigated Using a Single-Pass Gas-Dominant Flowloop , 2014 .

[7]  Jefferson L. Creek,et al.  New Method for Managing Hydrates in Deepwater Tiebacks , 2011 .

[8]  T. J. Hanratty,et al.  Effect of pipe diameter on the drop size in a horizontal annular gas–liquid flow , 2002 .

[9]  P. Rasmussen,et al.  A mass transport limited model for the growth of methane and ethane gas hydrates , 1994 .

[10]  Carolyn A. Koh,et al.  Clathrate hydrates of natural gases , 1990 .

[11]  Thomas J. Hanratty,et al.  Correlation of entrainment for annular flow in horizontal pipes , 2002 .

[12]  P. Glénat,et al.  Hydrate Formation in Gas Dominant systems , 2015 .

[13]  Dvora Barnea,et al.  A unified model for predicting flow-pattern transitions for the whole range of pipe inclinations , 1987 .

[14]  R. Roberts,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Liquid Entrainment In Gas At High Pressure , 2012 .

[15]  D. Mewes,et al.  The influence of heat transfer on the formation of hydrate layers in pipes , 1994 .

[16]  E. D. Sloan,et al.  Gas Hydrate Deposition on a Cold Surface in Water-Saturated Gas Systems , 2013 .

[17]  Michael L. Johns,et al.  Hydrate Formation in Gas-Dominant Systems Using a Single-Pass Flowloop , 2014 .

[18]  James P. Brill,et al.  Gas-Liquid Stratified-Wavy Flow in Horizontal Pipelines , 1997 .

[19]  Joseph W. Nicholas,et al.  Assessing the feasibility of hydrate deposition on pipeline walls--adhesion force measurements of clathrate hydrate particles on carbon steel. , 2009, Journal of colloid and interface science.