Neuroimaging of headaches in patients with normal neurological examination: protocol for a systematic review

Introduction Headache disorders (HD) are among the most frequent neurological disorders seen in neurology practice. Because secondary HD are rare, patients’ examination is most often unremarkable. However, the will to relieve patients’ anxiety and the fear of prosecutions lead to overuse of neuroimaging thus resulting in the discovery of incidental findings (IF) or normal variants that can lead to futile or harmful procedures. Knowing the probability of identifying a potentially clinically significant lesion in patients with isolated headache could facilitate decision-making and reduce health costs. This review aims to determine the prevalence of incidental findings and normal anatomic variants (NAV) on neuroimaging studies performed in patients presenting with headache and normal neurological examination. Method and analysis Studies reporting neuroimaging findings in patients with headache and normal neurological examination and published before the 30 September 2017 will be identified by searching PubMed, Medline and EMBASE (Excerpta Medica Database). Relevant unpublished papers and conference proceedings will also be checked. Full texts of eligible studies will then be accessed and data extracted using a standard data extraction sheet. Studies will be assessed for quality and risk of bias. Heterogeneity of studies will be evaluated by the χ2 test on Cochrane’s Q statistic. The prevalence of NAV and IF across studies and in relevant subgroups will be estimated by pooling the study-specific estimates using a random-effects meta-analysis. Visual analysis of funnel plot and Egger’s test will be used to detect publication bias. The report of this systematic review will be compliant with the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Ethics and dissemination The current study is based on published data; ethical approval is, therefore, not required. The final report of this systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. Furthermore, findings will be presented at conferences and submitted to relevant health authorities. Trial registration number CRD42017079714.

[1]  R. Evans,et al.  Incidental Findings and Normal Anatomical Variants on Brain MRI in Children for Primary Headaches , 2017, Headache.

[2]  R. Evans,et al.  Incidental Findings and Normal Anatomical Variants on MRI of the Brain in Adults for Primary Headaches , 2017, Headache.

[3]  H. Moon,et al.  Chronic Daily Headache and Medication Overuse Headache in First-Visit Headache Patients in Korea: A Multicenter Clinic-Based Study , 2016, Journal of clinical neurology.

[4]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement , 2015, Systematic Reviews.

[6]  Jan J Barendregt,et al.  Meta-analysis of prevalence , 2013, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[7]  F. Blyth,et al.  Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement. , 2012, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[8]  L. Bendtsen,et al.  Reference programme: Diagnosis and treatment of headache disorders and facial pain. Danish Headache Society, 2nd Edition, 2012 , 2012, The Journal of Headache and Pain.

[9]  J. Stockman Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2011 .

[10]  L. Stovner,et al.  Prevalence of headache in Europe: a review for the Eurolight project , 2010, The Journal of Headache and Pain.

[11]  Yoshito Tsushima,et al.  Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  R. Lipton,et al.  The Global Burden of Headache: A Documentation of Headache Prevalence and Disability Worldwide , 2007, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[13]  T. Schwedt,et al.  “Benign” Imaging Abnormalities in Children and Adolescents With Headache , 2006, Headache.

[14]  L. D. Goldberg The cost of migraine and its treatment. , 2005, The American journal of managed care.

[15]  A. Viera,et al.  Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. , 2005, Family medicine.

[16]  J. Sim,et al.  The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. , 2005, Physical therapy.

[17]  T J Steiner,et al.  The Prevalence and Disability Burden of Adult Migraine in England and their Relationships to Age, Gender and Ethnicity , 2003, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[18]  M. Valença,et al.  Computed tomography scan of the head in patients with migraine or tension-type headache. , 2002, Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria.

[19]  S. Thompson,et al.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[20]  I. Olkin,et al.  Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology - A proposal for reporting , 2000 .

[21]  G. Smith,et al.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test , 1997, BMJ.

[22]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. , 1968 .

[23]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .