Petrophysical Characterization of Permian Shallow-Water Dolostone

The complex interplay between depositional facies and diagenesis in dolostones presents numerous challenges for calculating petrophysical properties from wireline logs. Complex pore geometries and mineralogies control rock petrophysical properties, and equations for calculating porosities and saturations must therefore be tailored to specific pore geometry-mineralogy combinations. The complex mineralogy of some dolostone reservoirs, moreover, has profound effects on wireline log measurements. If dolostone reservoirs are divided into petrophysical-mineralogical facies of similar depositional and diagenetic textures and, thus, similar pore geometries and mineralogy, empirical equations that apply specifically to that geologically identified petrophysical-mineralogical facies can be developed so that porosity and water saturation can be calculated accurately. We present some examples from Permian shallow-water dolostone reservoirs of the Permian Basin, southwestern United States, that demonstrate analytical approaches for calculating petrophysical properties in these complex rock types. The four general petrophysical-mineralogical facies that characterize Permian shallow-water dolostone reservoirs are (1) subtidal, muddominated dolostone; (2) subtidal, grain-dominated dolostone; (3) dolomitic and siliciclastic peritidal rocks; and (4) diagenetically altered, subtidal dolostone.

[1]  E. Pittman.  Porosity, Diagenesis, and Productive Capability of Sandstone Reservoirs: ABSTRACT , 1977 .

[2]  A. R. Gregory,et al.  ELASTIC WAVE VELOCITIES IN HETEROGENEOUS AND POROUS MEDIA , 1956 .

[3]  F. Lucia,et al.  Petrophysical Parameters Estimated From Visual Descriptions of Carbonate Rocks: A Field Classification of Carbonate Pore Space , 1983 .

[4]  D. L. Johnson,et al.  Effect Of Spherical Pores On Sonic And Resistivity Measurements , 1985 .

[5]  J. Raiga-Clemenceau,et al.  The dual-porosity model, A newly developed interpretation method for shaly sands , 1984 .

[6]  W. Fertl.  Geologic well log analysis , 1981 .

[7]  R. C. Murray.  Origin of Porosity in Carbonate Rocks , 1960 .

[8]  G. Asquith.  Handbook of Log Evaluation Techniques for Carbonate Reservoirs , 1985 .

[9]  F. Jerry Lucia,et al.  Rock-Fabric/Petrophysical Classification of Carbonate Pore Space for Reservoir Characterization , 1995 .

[10]  P. Choquette,et al.  Geologic Nomenclature and Classification of Porosity in Sedimentary Carbonates , 1970 .

[11]  G. Fogg,et al.  Characterization of the Grayburg Reservoir, University Lands Dune Field, Crane County, Texas , 1987 .

[12]  C. Chree,et al.  [Letters to Editor] , 1925, Nature.

[13]  L. L. Raymer,et al.  An Improved Sonic Transit Time-To-Porosity Transform , 1980 .

[14]  G. E. Archie.  The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics , 1942 .

[15]  D. Munn,et al.  Cementation Exponents in Middle Eastern Carbonate Reservoirs , 1987 .

[16]  A. M. Borai.  A new correlation for the cementation factor in low-porosity carbonates , 1987 .

[17]  G. Coates,et al.  A New Approach To Carbonate Analysis , 1978 .