Influence of the pressure dependent coefficient of friction on deep drawing springback predictions

Abstract The aim of this work is to show the influence of defining a pressure dependent friction coefficient on numerical springback predictions of a DX54D mild steel, a HSLA380 and a DP780 high strength steel. The pressure dependent friction model of each material was fitted to the experimental data obtained by Strip Drawing tests and then implemented in the numerical simulation of an industrial automotive part drawing process. The results showed important differences between defining a pressure dependent or a constant friction coefficient. Finally, the experimental part was produced to compare the real geometry with the predictions obtained with the different simulation strategies. An improvement of 20–25% in springback prediction was achieved when using the pressure dependent friction model.

[1]  V. T. Meinders,et al.  A friction model for loading and reloading effects in deep drawing process , 2014 .

[2]  Peng Chen,et al.  Simulation of springback variation in forming of advanced high strength steels , 2007 .

[3]  Ji Hoon Kim,et al.  Evaluating the significance of hardening behavior and unloading modulus under strain reversal in sheet springback prediction , 2013 .

[4]  Bernard Rolfe,et al.  Understanding robustness of springback in high strength steels , 2013 .

[5]  You You-peng Finite element analysis on influencing factors of springback in sheet metal V-bending , 2012 .

[6]  Kjell Mattiasson,et al.  Experiences from experimental and numerical springback studies of a semi-industrial forming tool , 2012 .

[7]  Xinhai Zhu,et al.  Describing the non-saturating cyclic hardening behavior with a newly developed kinematic hardening model and its application in springback prediction of DP sheet metals , 2015 .

[8]  Frédéric Barlat,et al.  Constitutive and friction modeling for accurate springback analysis of advanced high strength steel sheets , 2015 .

[9]  M. D. Rooij,et al.  Multi-scale friction modelling for rough contacts under sliding conditions , 2013 .

[10]  Pedro Teixeira,et al.  A study on experimental benchmarks and simulation results in sheet metal forming , 2008 .

[11]  R. Narayanasamy,et al.  Influence of Lubrication on Springback in Air Bending Process of Interstitial Free Steel Sheet , 2010 .

[12]  M. Merklein,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Investigations on Frictional Behaviour under Consideration of Varying Tribological Conditions , 2014 .

[13]  M. C. Alfaro,et al.  Advanced friction modeling for sheet metal forming , 2012 .

[14]  K. Manabe,et al.  FE forming analysis with nonlinear friction coefficient model considering contact pressure, sliding velocity and sliding length , 2016 .

[15]  Dirk J. Schipper,et al.  A load dependent friction model for fully plastic contact conditions , 2010 .

[16]  Kjell Mattiasson,et al.  On constitutive modeling for springback analysis , 2010 .

[18]  Bernard Rolfe,et al.  Statistical analysis of finite element modeling in sheet metal forming and springback analysis , 2008 .

[19]  Ping Hu,et al.  Compensation factor method for modeling springback of auto parts constructed with high-strength steel , 2010 .