We present a high-resolution procedure to reconstruct common-midpoint (CMP) gathers. First, we describe the forward and inverse transformations between offset and velocity space. Then, we formulate an underdetermined linear inverse problem in which the target is the artifacts-free, aperture-compensated velocity gather. We show that a sparse inversion leads to a solution that resembles the infinite-aperture velocity gather. The latter is the velocity gather that should have been estimated with a simple conjugate operator designed from an infinite-aperture seismic array. This high-resolution velocity gather is then used to reconstruct the offset space. The algorithm is formally derived using two basic principles. First, we use the principle of maximum entropy to translate prior information about the unknown parameters into a probabilistic framework, in other words, to assign a probability density function to our model. Second, we apply Bayes’s rule to relate the a priori probability density function (pdf) with the pdf corresponding to the experimental uncertainties (likelihood function) to construct the a posteriori distribution of the unknown parameters. Finally the model is evaluated by maximizing the a posteriori distribution. When the problem is correctly regularized, the algorithm converges to a solution characterized by different degrees of sparseness depending on the required resolution. The solutions exhibit minimum entropy when the entropy is measured in terms of Burg’s definition. We emphasize two crucial differences in our approach with the familiar Burg method of maximum entropy spectral analysis. First, Burg’s entropy is minimized rather than maximized, which is equivalent to inferring as much as possible about the model from the data. Second, our approach uses the data as constraints in contrast with the classic maximum entropy spectral analysis approach where the autocorrelation function is the constraint. This implies that we recover not only amplitude information but also phase information, which serves to extrapolate the data outside the original aperture of the array. The tradeoff is controlled by a single parameter that under asymptotic conditions reduces the method to a damped least-squares solution. Finally, the high-resolution or aperture-compensated velocity gather is used to extrapolate near- and far-offset traces.
[1]
C. R. Smith,et al.
Maximum-Entropy and Bayesian Methods in Inverse Problems
,
1985
.
[2]
Jon F. Claerbout,et al.
Velocity-stack and slant-stack stochastic inversion
,
1985
.
[3]
M. Taner,et al.
SEMBLANCE AND OTHER COHERENCY MEASURES FOR MULTICHANNEL DATA
,
1971
.
[4]
Gregory Beylkin,et al.
Discrete radon transform
,
1987,
IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..
[5]
Scott B. Smithson,et al.
New approach to seismic-reflection event detection and velocity determination
,
1990
.
[6]
J. Claerbout.
Earth Soundings Analysis: Processing Versus Inversion
,
1992
.
[7]
Öz Yilmaz,et al.
VELOCITY‐STACK PROCESSING1
,
1989
.
[8]
A. Tarantola.
Inverse problem theory : methods for data fitting and model parameter estimation
,
1987
.
[9]
S. Treitel,et al.
A REVIEW OF LEAST-SQUARES INVERSION AND ITS APPLICATION TO GEOPHYSICAL PROBLEMS*
,
1984
.
[10]
Alexander V. Tikhonov,et al.
Ill-Posed Problems in Natural Sciences
,
1989
.
[11]
T. Owen.
Book reviewEarth soundings analysis
,
1993
.
[12]
L. M. M.-T..
Theory of Probability
,
1929,
Nature.
[13]
J. Skilling,et al.
Maximum-entropy and Bayesian methods in inverse problems
,
1985
.
[14]
Clement Kostov,et al.
High-resolution velocity spectra using eigenstructure methods
,
1989
.
[15]
Özdoan Yilmaz.
Velocity-stack Processing
,
1988
.