Evolution of chromosome organization driven by selection for reduced gene expression noise

The distribution of genes on eukaryotic chromosomes is nonrandom, but the reasons behind this are not well understood. The commonly observed clustering of essential genes is a case in point. Here we model and test a new hypothesis. Essential proteins are unusual in that random fluctuations in abundance (noise) can be highly deleterious. We hypothesize that persistently open chromatin domains are sinks for essential genes, as they enable reduced noise by avoidance of transcriptional bursting associated with chromatin remodeling. Simulation of the model captures clustering and correctly predicts that (i) essential gene clusters are associated with low nucleosome occupancy (ii) noise-sensitive nonessential genes cluster with essential genes (iii) nonessential genes of similar knockout fitness are physically linked (iv) genes in domains rich in essential genes have low noise (v) essential genes are rare subtelomerically and (vi) essential gene clusters are preferentially conserved. We conclude that different noise characteristics of different genomic domains favors nonrandom gene positioning. This has implications for gene therapy and understanding transgenic phenotypes.

[1]  M. Nei,et al.  Modification of linkage intensity by natural selection. , 1967, Genetics.

[2]  E. Gilson,et al.  Evidence for silencing compartments within the yeast nucleus: a role for telomere proximity and Sir protein concentration in silencer-mediated repression. , 1996, Genes & development.

[3]  S. Tapscott,et al.  Modeling stochastic gene expression: implications for haploinsufficiency. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  B. Barrell,et al.  Prevalence of small inversions in yeast gene order evolution. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome , 2002, Nature.

[6]  Gerald M Rubin,et al.  Evidence for large domains of similarly expressed genes in the Drosophila genome , 2002, Journal of biology.

[7]  Y. Dong,et al.  Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi , 2003, Nature.

[8]  J. W. Campbell,et al.  Experimental Determination and System Level Analysis of Essential Genes in Escherichia coli MG1655 , 2003, Journal of bacteriology.

[9]  D. M. Krylov,et al.  Gene loss, protein sequence divergence, gene dispensability, expression level, and interactivity are correlated in eukaryotic evolution. , 2003, Genome research.

[10]  Laurence D. Hurst,et al.  Evidence for co-evolution of gene order and recombination rate , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[11]  A. E. Hirsh,et al.  Noise Minimization in Eukaryotic Gene Expression , 2004, PLoS biology.

[12]  C. Pál,et al.  The evolutionary dynamics of eukaryotic gene order , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[13]  Nancy Hopkins,et al.  Identification of 315 genes essential for early zebrafish development. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  J. Lieb,et al.  Evidence for nucleosome depletion at active regulatory regions genome-wide , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[15]  Nick Gilbert,et al.  Chromatin Architecture of the Human Genome Gene-Rich Domains Are Enriched in Open Chromatin Fibers , 2004, Cell.

[16]  J. Raser,et al.  Noise in Gene Expression: Origins, Consequences, and Control , 2005, Science.

[17]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Mechanisms of Haploinsufficiency Revealed by Genome-Wide Profiling in Yeast , 2005, Genetics.

[18]  Benjamin B. Kaufmann,et al.  Contributions of low molecule number and chromosomal positioning to stochastic gene expression , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[19]  J. Derisi,et al.  Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise , 2006, Nature.

[20]  Michael Knop,et al.  Evolution of the hemiascomycete yeasts: on life styles and the importance of inbreeding , 2006, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[21]  Stephen C. J. Parker,et al.  Towards the identification of essential genes using targeted genome sequencing and comparative analysis , 2006, BMC Genomics.

[22]  G. Tomaselli,et al.  Charged Residues between the Selectivity Filter and S6 Segments Contribute to the Permeation Phenotype of the Sodium Channel , 2000, The Journal of General Physiology.

[23]  D. Tranchina,et al.  Stochastic mRNA Synthesis in Mammalian Cells , 2006, PLoS biology.

[24]  Kathryn E. Hentges,et al.  Regional Variation in the Density of Essential Genes in Mice , 2007, PLoS genetics.

[25]  Araxi O. Urrutia,et al.  Chromatin remodelling is a major source of coexpression of linked genes in yeast. , 2007, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[26]  Peter J. Lockhart,et al.  Chromatin remodelling is a major source of coexpression of linked genes in yeast , 2007 .