On the current state of combining human and artificial intelligence for strategic organizational decision making

Strategic organizational decision making in today’s complex world is a dynamic process characterized by uncertainty. Therefore, diverse groups of responsible employees deal with the large amount and variety of information, which must be acquired and interpreted correctly to deduce adequate alternatives. The technological potential of artificial intelligence (AI) is expected to offer further support, although research in this regard is still developing. However, as the technology is designed to have capabilities beyond those of traditional machines, the effects on the division of tasks and the definition of roles established in the current human–machine relationship are discussed with increasing awareness. Based on a systematic literature review, combined with content analysis, this article provides an overview of the possibilities that current research identifies for integrating AI into organizational decision making under uncertainty. The findings are summarized in a conceptual model that first explains how humans can use AI for decision making under uncertainty and then identifies the challenges, pre-conditions, and consequences that must be considered. While research on organizational structures, the choice of AI application, and the possibilities of knowledge management is extensive, a clear recommendation for ethical frameworks, despite being defined as a crucial foundation, is missing. In addition, AI, other than traditional machines, can amplify problems inherent in the decision-making process rather than help to reduce them. As a result, the human responsibility increases, while the capabilities needed to use the technology differ from other machines, thus making education necessary. These findings make the study valuable for both researchers and practitioners.

[1]  E. Carbone,et al.  Individual vs. group decision-making: an experiment on dynamic choice under risk and ambiguity , 2019, Theory and Decision.

[2]  Jim Waldo,et al.  The Effects of Mixing Machine Learning and Human Judgment , 2019, ACM Queue.

[3]  Vojtech Stehel,et al.  Towards a Smart Automated Society: Cognitive Technologies, Knowledge Production, and Economic Growth , 2019, Economics, Management, and Financial Markets.

[4]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: An Empirical Science , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[5]  Nils J. Nilsson,et al.  The Quest For Artificial Intelligence: A History Of Ideas And Achievements , 2009 .

[6]  Ping Zhang,et al.  The Effects of Animation on Information Seeking Performance on the World Wide Web: Securing Attention or Interfering with Primary Tasks? , 2000, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[7]  J. Fredrickson The Comprehensiveness of Strategic Decision Processes: Extension, Observations, Future Directions , 1984 .

[8]  F. Knight The economic nature of the firm: From Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit , 2009 .

[9]  Vagan Y. Terziyan,et al.  Patented intelligence: Cloning human decision models for Industry 4.0 , 2018, Journal of Manufacturing Systems.

[10]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The information processing explanation of Gestalt phenomena , 1986 .

[11]  Ana Isabel Canhoto,et al.  Artificial intelligence and machine learning as business tools: A framework for diagnosing value destruction potential , 2020 .

[12]  Janet Marsden,et al.  Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review Booth Andrew Papaioannou Diana and Sutton Anthea Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review 288pp £22.99 Sage 9780857021359 0857021354 , 2014 .

[13]  Erik Blasch,et al.  Methods of AI for Multimodal Sensing and Action for Complex Situations , 2019, AI Mag..

[14]  Peter Vamplew,et al.  Human-aligned artificial intelligence is a multiobjective problem , 2018, Ethics and Information Technology.

[15]  Bart Baesens,et al.  Defining analytics maturity indicators: A survey approach , 2017, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[16]  Behrooz Karimi,et al.  IoT-based framework for performance measurement: A real-time supply chain decision alignment , 2017, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[17]  Jack R. Meredith,et al.  Theory Building through Conceptual Methods , 1993 .

[18]  Roland T. Rust,et al.  The Feeling Economy: Managing in the Next Generation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) , 2019, California Management Review.

[19]  Matthias Sutter,et al.  Groups Make Better Self-Interested Decisions , 2012 .

[20]  Nicholas Hertz,et al.  Good advice is beyond all price, but what if it comes from a machine? , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[21]  K. Valaskova,et al.  The Power of Human–machine Collaboration: Artificial Intelligence, Business Automation, and the Smart Economy , 2018 .

[22]  Vincent C. Müller Introduction: Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence , 2012, Minds and Machines.

[23]  D. Tranfield,et al.  Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review , 2003 .

[24]  Luis-Felipe Rodríguez,et al.  Autonomous Agents and Ethical Decision-Making , 2016, Cognitive Computation.

[25]  Kyle Bogosian,et al.  Implementation of Moral Uncertainty in Intelligent Machines , 2017, Minds and Machines.

[26]  M. Eisend,et al.  Path Dependence in Decision-Making Processes: Exploring the Impact of Complexity under Increasing Returns , 2009 .

[27]  R. Smith Idealizations of Uncertainty, and Lessons from Artificial Intelligence , 2016 .

[28]  Marko Bohanec,et al.  Decision-making framework with double-loop learning through interpretable black-box machine learning models , 2017, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[29]  Sergey A. Yablonsky,et al.  Multidimensional Data-Driven Artificial Intelligence Innovation , 2019, Technology Innovation Management Review.

[30]  Hugh J. Watson,et al.  Preparing for the Cognitive Generation of Decision Support , 2017, MIS Q. Executive.

[31]  Robert D. Galliers,et al.  Towards an understanding of the role of business intelligence systems in organisational knowing , 2016, Inf. Syst. J..

[32]  Vegard Kolbjørnsrud,et al.  Partnering with AI: how organizations can win over skeptical managers , 2017 .

[33]  C. Glock,et al.  Purchasing Organization and Design: A Literature Review , 2011 .

[34]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[35]  Martin Kenney,et al.  Algorithms, Platforms, and Ethnic Bias: An Integrative Essay , 2018 .

[36]  N. Sanders,et al.  How Big Data Could Challenge Planning Processes across the Supply Chain , 2018 .

[37]  Thomas Robbert,et al.  On the sunk-cost effect in economic decision-making: a meta-analytic review , 2015 .

[38]  Philip Meissner A process-based perspective on strategic planning: the role of alternative generation and information integration , 2014 .

[39]  N. Sanders,et al.  Forecasting sales in the supply chain: Consumer analytics in the big data era , 2019, International Journal of Forecasting.

[40]  M. Christopher,et al.  The self-thinking supply chain , 2019, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal.

[41]  John McCarthy,et al.  A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence, August 31, 1955 , 2006, AI Mag..

[42]  Reiner Quick,et al.  Improving Environmental Scanning Systems Using Bayesian Networks , 2013 .

[43]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[44]  K. Butner,et al.  How the human-machine interchange will transform business operations , 2019, Strategy & Leadership.

[45]  Oliver Kirchkamp,et al.  Sharing responsibility with a machine , 2018, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics.

[46]  Pooya Tabesh,et al.  Implementing big data strategies: A managerial perspective , 2019, Business Horizons.

[47]  J. Sydow Managing Inter-organizational Networks: Governance and Practices Between Path Dependence and Uncertainty , 2017 .

[48]  David Danks,et al.  Algorithmic Bias in Autonomous Systems , 2017, IJCAI.

[49]  Anthea Sutton,et al.  Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review , 2012 .

[50]  Thomas Spengler,et al.  Modeling rational decisions in ambiguous situations: a multi-valued logic approach , 2019, Business Research.

[51]  P. Roetzel,et al.  Information overload in the information age: a review of the literature from business administration, business psychology, and related disciplines with a bibliometric approach and framework development , 2018, Business Research.

[52]  Michael Rovatsos,et al.  "It would be pretty immoral to choose a random algorithm" , 2019, J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc..

[53]  G. Krogh Artificial Intelligence in Organizations: New Opportunities for Phenomenon-Based Theorizing , 2018, Academy of Management Discoveries.

[54]  Scott A. Wright,et al.  The rising tide of artificial intelligence and business automation: Developing an ethical framework , 2018, Business Horizons.

[55]  Beau Sheil,et al.  Thinking about artificial intelligence , 1989 .

[56]  Qingqi Long,et al.  Data-driven decision making for supply chain networks with agent-based computational experiment , 2018, Knowl. Based Syst..

[57]  Elena Gregova,et al.  Smart Manufacturing Technologies: Data-driven Algorithms in Production Planning, Sustainable Value Creation, and Operational Performance Improvement , 2019, Economics, Management, and Financial Markets.

[58]  M. Leyer,et al.  Me or information technology? Adoption of artificial intelligence in the delegation of personal strategic decisions , 2019, Managerial and Decision Economics.

[59]  Grigoris Antoniou,et al.  Predicting supply chain risks using machine learning: The trade-off between performance and interpretability , 2019, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[60]  Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi,et al.  Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making , 2018, Business Horizons.

[61]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory , 1967 .

[62]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  Supply chain design: issues, challenges, frameworks and solutions , 2014 .

[63]  Daniel B. Shank,et al.  When are artificial intelligence versus human agents faulted for wrongdoing? Moral attributions after individual and joint decisions , 2019, Information, Communication & Society.

[64]  Oren Etzioni,et al.  AI assisted ethics , 2016, Ethics and Information Technology.

[65]  J. March,et al.  Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol. , 1981 .

[66]  Jordi Pereira,et al.  A new model for supply chain network design with integrated assembly line balancing decisions , 2016 .

[67]  D. Kahneman Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics , 2003 .

[68]  D. Tranfield,et al.  Producing a systematic review. , 2009 .

[69]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Effects of Devil′s Advocacy and Dialectical Inquiry on Individuals versus Groups , 1994 .

[70]  Patrick L. Anderson Business strategy and firm location decisions: testing traditional and modern methods , 2019, Business Economics.

[71]  Joseph B. Lyons,et al.  Certifiable Trust in Autonomous Systems: Making the Intractable Tangible , 2017, AI Mag..

[72]  Miriam A. M. Capretz,et al.  Machine Learning With Big Data: Challenges and Approaches , 2017, IEEE Access.

[73]  Mauro Birattari,et al.  The Metaphysical Character of the Criticisms Raised Against the Use of Probability for Dealing with Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence , 2008, Minds and Machines.

[74]  Heng-Soon Gan,et al.  Multi-stakeholder decision theory , 2018, Ann. Oper. Res..

[75]  Shiko M. Ben-Menahem,et al.  Organizational Decision-Making Structures in the Age of Artificial Intelligence , 2019, California Management Review.

[76]  Jan Kietzmann,et al.  Artificial intelligence: Building blocks and an innovation typology , 2020 .

[77]  Petros Ieromonachou,et al.  Big data analytics in supply chain management: A state-of-the-art literature review , 2017, Comput. Oper. Res..

[78]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  RESEARCH ON STRATEGY-MAKING. , 1972 .

[79]  Simone Colombo,et al.  The Holistic Risk Analysis and Modelling (HoRAM) method , 2019, Safety Science.

[80]  Denis Bouyssou,et al.  On some ordinal models for decision making under uncertainty , 2008, Ann. Oper. Res..

[81]  Shahriar Akter,et al.  How ‘Big Data’ Can Make Big Impact: Findings from a Systematic Review and a Longitudinal Case Study , 2015 .

[82]  Shane Legg,et al.  Universal Intelligence: A Definition of Machine Intelligence , 2007, Minds and Machines.

[83]  Michael Grottke,et al.  A systematic literature review of mining weak signals and trends for corporate foresight , 2018 .

[84]  Gabriella Pigozzi,et al.  Preferences in artificial intelligence , 2016, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.

[85]  Joaquim Lloveras,et al.  Development of an AI-based Rapid Manufacturing Advice System , 2010 .

[86]  Cemil Kuzey,et al.  A comparative analysis of machine learning systems for measuring the impact of knowledge management practices , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[87]  Luciana Parisi,et al.  Critical Computation: Digital Automata and General Artificial Thinking , 2019, Theory, Culture & Society.

[88]  G. Antoniou,et al.  Supply chain risk management and artificial intelligence: state of the art and future research directions , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[89]  Pak-Hang Wong,et al.  Democratizing Algorithmic Fairness , 2019, Philosophy & Technology.

[90]  D. Rousseau,et al.  Evidence in Management and Organizational Science: Assembling the Field's Full Weight of Scientific Knowledge through Syntheses , 2008 .

[91]  Roland T. Rust,et al.  Artificial Intelligence in Service , 2018 .

[92]  Yunfeng Zhang,et al.  AI Fairness 360: An extensible toolkit for detecting and mitigating algorithmic bias , 2019, IBM Journal of Research and Development.

[93]  Christoph M. Flath,et al.  Towards a data science toolbox for industrial analytics applications , 2018, Comput. Ind..

[94]  Xiao Fu,et al.  Coordinating a trust-embedded two-tier supply chain by options with multiple transaction periods , 2017, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[95]  Matthias Klumpp,et al.  Logistics Innovation and Social Sustainability: How to Prevent an Artificial Divide in Human–Computer Interaction , 2019, Journal of Business Logistics.

[96]  S. Sethi,et al.  Relationship-specific investment and hold-up problems in supply chains: theory and experiments , 2018, Business Research.

[97]  Andreas M. Kaplan,et al.  Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence , 2019, Business Horizons.

[98]  Marcus Brandenburg,et al.  Stakeholder influences and risks in sustainable supply chain management: a comparison of qualitative and quantitative studies , 2018 .

[99]  Benny Tjahjono,et al.  Applying performance measures to support decision-making in supply chain operations: a case of beverage industry , 2016 .

[100]  Shaofeng Liu,et al.  A decision-focused knowledge management framework to support collaborative decision making for lean supply chain management , 2013 .

[101]  Sukanto Bhattacharya,et al.  Rise of the Machines , 2016 .

[102]  Demystifying the Big Data Phenomenon for Strategic Leadership , 2017 .

[103]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Exploring the Impact of Artificial Intelligence: Prediction Versus Judgment , 2018, Information Economics and Policy.

[104]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  A hybrid adaptive decision system for supply chain reconfiguration , 2016 .

[105]  Thomas B. Lawrence,et al.  Impacts of Artificial Intelligence on Organizational Decision Making , 1991 .

[106]  Abubaker Haddud,et al.  Procurement 4.0: factors influencing the digitisation of procurement and supply chains , 2018, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[107]  Tino T. Herden,et al.  Explaining the competitive advantage generated from Analytics with the knowledge-based view: the example of Logistics and Supply Chain Management , 2019, Business Research.

[108]  Louis Rosenberg,et al.  Keeping Humans in the Loop: Pooling Knowledge through Artificial Swarm Intelligence to Improve Business Decision Making: , 2019 .

[109]  Thomas Bolander,et al.  What do we loose when machines take the decisions? , 2019, Journal of Management and Governance.

[110]  T. Bauer,et al.  Violations of dominance in decision-making , 2019, Business Research.

[111]  J. Savulescu,et al.  The Artificial Moral Advisor. The “Ideal Observer” Meets Artificial Intelligence , 2017, Philosophy & Technology.

[112]  Henry Mintzberg Strategy-Making in Three Modes , 1973 .

[113]  Stefano Fiori Forms of Bounded Rationality: The Reception and Redefinition of Herbert A. Simon's Perspective , 2011 .

[114]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Fair, Transparent, and Accountable Algorithmic Decision-making Processes , 2017, Philosophy & Technology.

[115]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Network Learning: The Effects of Partners' Heterogeneity of Experience on Corporate Acquisitions , 2002 .

[116]  R. Descartes,et al.  A Discourse on Method , 2020 .

[117]  M. Resnik Choices: An Introduction to Decision Theory , 1990 .

[118]  D. Marquis,et al.  Effect of uncertainty on risk taking in individual and group decisions , 1969 .

[119]  Marko Bohanec,et al.  Explaining machine learning models in sales predictions , 2017, Expert Syst. Appl..

[120]  Maryam Kouchaki,et al.  Not All Fairness Is Created Equal: Fairness Perceptions of Group vs. Individual Decision Makers , 2015, Organ. Sci..

[121]  M. Kocher,et al.  Are Groups More Rational than Individuals? A Review of Interactive Decision Making in Groups , 2012, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[122]  Verena Bader,et al.  Algorithmic decision-making? The user interface and its role for human involvement in decisions supported by artificial intelligence , 2019, Organization.

[123]  Andrew D. Selbst,et al.  Big Data's Disparate Impact , 2016 .

[124]  Carmel Foley,et al.  The sharing economy and digital discrimination: The case of Airbnb , 2018 .

[125]  Mitchell J. Neubert,et al.  Virtue as a framework for the design and use of artificial intelligence , 2020 .

[126]  David Denyer,et al.  Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis as a Practice and Scholarship Tool , 2012 .

[127]  Harry Surden,et al.  Artificial Intelligence and Law: An Overview , 2019 .

[128]  Christian Julmi,et al.  When rational decision-making becomes irrational: a critical assessment and re-conceptualization of intuition effectiveness , 2019, Business Research.