Domains and determinants of university students' self-perceived computer competence

The first aim of this study was to develop an instrument of self-perceived computer competence and to assess differences among university students. For this purpose, two instruments were developed: 'quantity of computer applications' (16 items) and 'quality of application use' (30 items). Questionnaires were administered to two samples of first-year university students in psychology, education and andragogics. The results indicated a high correlation between the two computer competence scales. The second aim was to identify possible determinants of self-perceived computer competence and to test the impact at an individual level. The results from a path model demonstrated that self-perceived computer competence (quality of application use) was affected by four factors: computer confidence, computer experience expressed in time, intensity of computer use and home access to a computer. The four variables accounted for a significant proportion of the variation (54%) in the self-perceived computer competence variable.

[1]  Ibrahim M. Al-Jabri,et al.  The relationship of attitudes to computer utilization: New evidence from a developing nation , 1998 .

[2]  Steve Schlough,et al.  An Analysis of Required Computer Competencies for University Students , 1995 .

[3]  T. Levine,et al.  Computer use, confidence, attitudes, and knowledge : A causal analysis , 1998 .

[4]  Larry Cuban,et al.  Should We Be Worried? What the Research Says about Gender Differences in Access, Use, Attitudes, and Achievement with Computers. , 1998 .

[5]  Douglas E. Loyd,et al.  The Reliability and Validity of an Instrument for the Assessment of Computer Attitudes , 1985 .

[6]  Angela F. L. Wong,et al.  Computer anxiety and its correlates : a meta-analysis , 1999 .

[7]  Johan van Braak,et al.  Individual Characteristics Influencing Teachers' Class Use of Computers , 2001 .

[8]  S. Zammit.  Factors facilitating or hindering the use of computers in schools , 1992 .

[9]  Larry Cuban.  Oversold and Underused , 2001 .

[10]  Dee L. Fabry,et al.  Barriers to the Effective Use of Technology in Education: Current Status , 1997 .

[11]  B. Whitley.  Gender Differences in Computer-Related Attitudes and Behavior: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[12]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[13]  N. Jo Campbell,et al.  Relation of Computer Attitudes and Computer Attributions to Enrollment in High School Computer Courses and Self-Perceived Computer Proficiency , 1990 .

[14]  Clarice P. Gressard,et al.  Reliability and Factorial Validity of Computer Attitude Scales , 1984 .

[15]  Henryk R. Marcinkiewicz.  Computers and Teachers: Factors Influencing Computer Use in the Classroom , 1993 .

[16]  Andrew M. Colman,et al.  Gender and Social Facilitation Effects on Computer Competence and Attitudes toward Computers , 1996 .

[17]  D. G. Gardner,et al.  Computer use, self-confidence, and attitudes: A causal analysis , 1993 .

[18]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  An Assessment of Basic Computer Proficiency Among Active Internet Users: Test Construction, Calibration, Antecedents and Consequences , 2002 .

[19]  Claudia Flowers,et al.  Development and Validation of Scores on the Basic Technology Competencies for Educators Inventory , 2000 .