Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging of Drusen in Non-Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Purpose— To measure drusen area and volume in eyes with non-exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) using spectral domain optical coherence tomography imaging (SDOCT). Design— Evaluation of diagnostic technology Participants— One hundred three eyes from 74 patients with drusen Methods— Patients with drusen secondary to non-exudative AMD were enrolled in this study. Five separate SDOCT scans, each consisting of 40000 uniformly spaced A-scans organized as 200 A-scans in each B-scan and 200 horizontal B-scans, were performed on each eye. Each scan covered a retinal area of 6×6 mm centered on the fovea. A novel algorithm was used to quantitatively assess drusen area and volume. Measurements from the entire scans, as well as in regions contained within 3 mm and 5 mm circles centered on the fovea, were analyzed. Test-retest standard deviations of drusen area and volume measurements were calculated for each eye. The algorithm created drusen maps that permitted both qualitative and quantitative assessment of drusen area and volume. Both the qualitative appearance and the quantitative measurements of drusen area and volume were highly reproducible over the 5 different datasets. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was above 0.99 for both area and volume measurements on the entire dataset as well as the 3 mm and 5 mm circles. The correlation between lesion size and the test-retest standard deviations can be eliminated by performing a square-root transformation of the area measurements and a cube-root transformation of the volume measurements. These transformed data allowed for the inclusion of all test-retest Conclusions— A novel algorithm for the qualitative and quantitative assessment of drusen imaged using SDOCT was shown to be highly reproducible. The ability to assess drusen volume reliably represents a new quantitative parameter to measure in AMD and may be useful when assessing disease progression, particularly in trials for treatments of non-exudative AMD.

[1]  Giovanni Staurenghi,et al.  ARTIFACTS IN AUTOMATIC RETINAL SEGMENTATION USING DIFFERENT OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY INSTRUMENTS , 2010, Retina.

[2]  W. Freeman,et al.  OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY-RASTER SCANNING AND MANUAL SEGMENTATION IN DETERMINING DRUSEN VOLUME IN AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION , 2010, Retina.

[3]  P A Keane,et al.  Accuracy of retinal thickness measurements obtained with Cirrus optical coherence tomography , 2009, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[4]  Joel S Schuman,et al.  Assessment of artifacts and reproducibility across spectral- and time-domain optical coherence tomography devices. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[5]  Stefan Sacu,et al.  Comparison of retinal thickness measurements and segmentation performance of four different spectral and time domain OCT devices in neovascular age-related macular degeneration , 2009, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[6]  Aziz A. Khanifar,et al.  Drusen ultrastructure imaging with spectral domain optical coherence tomography in age-related macular degeneration. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[7]  J M Seddon,et al.  Spectral domain optical coherence tomography for quantitative evaluation of drusen and associated structural changes in non-neovascular age-related macular degeneration , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[8]  Brandon J Lujan,et al.  Calibration of fundus images using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. , 2008, Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging : the official journal of the International Society for Imaging in the Eye.

[9]  Douglas R. Anderson,et al.  Reproducibility of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber thickness measurements with stratus OCT in glaucomatous eyes. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[10]  J. Folch,et al.  Reproducibility of Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Thickness Measurements with Stratus OCT in Glaucomatous Eyes , 2008 .

[11]  Frank Eperjesi,et al.  Use of fundus imaging in quantification of age-related macular change. , 2007, Survey of ophthalmology.

[12]  Anna Szkulmowska,et al.  Analysis of posterior retinal layers in spectral optical coherence tomography images of the normal retina and retinal pathologies. , 2007, Journal of biomedical optics.

[13]  Johanna M Seddon,et al.  Evaluation of the clinical age-related maculopathy staging system. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[14]  E Reichel,et al.  Ultrahigh resolution optical coherence tomography in non-exudative age related macular degeneration , 2006, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[15]  Ronald Klein,et al.  A simplified severity scale for age-related macular degeneration: AREDS Report No. 18. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.

[16]  Matthew D. Davis,et al.  The Age-Related Eye Disease Study severity scale for age-related macular degeneration: AREDS Report No. 17. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.

[17]  P. Mitchell,et al.  Age-Related Eye Disease Study severity scale and simplified severity scale for age-related macular degeneration. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.

[18]  J. Duker,et al.  Three-dimensional retinal imaging with high-speed ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. , 2005, Ophthalmology.

[19]  Shuliang Jiao,et al.  Simultaneous acquisition of sectional and fundus ophthalmic images with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. , 2005, Optics express.

[20]  R. Klein,et al.  The Wisconsin age-related maculopathy grading system. , 1991, Ophthalmology.

[21]  J. Fleiss The design and analysis of clinical experiments , 1987 .