Reference interval for fetal biometry in Italian population.

OBJECTIVES To validate new references charts and equations for fetal biometry in an Italian unselected population. METHODS A cross-sectional study involving 4896 women with singleton viable pregnancies, at Artemisia Fetal Maternal Medical Centre between May 2009 and December 2009. Each woman was scanned only once, between 14+0 and 40+0 weeks of gestation. The fetal standard biometric measurements were recorded. For each parameter, regression models were fitted to estimate the percentile at each gestational age. In order to be compared to other reference equations, the fetal biometric measurements at each gestational age were expressed as Z-scores. RESULTS New fetal charts and references equations for Italian population were developed according to the recommend multistep statistical procedure. CONCLUSION To our knowledge this is the first Italian study with the largest sample size ever reported in the literature. In addiction, our newer charts of reference centiles for fetal biometric measurements are useful in the obstetrical clinical practice for the Italian population.

[1]  P. Royston,et al.  How to construct ‘normal ranges’ for fetal variables , 1998, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[2]  Nigel Rice,et al.  Multilevel Models: Applications to Health Data , 1996, Journal of health services research & policy.

[3]  M. Duyme,et al.  French fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with other charts , 2006, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[4]  F. P. Hadlock,et al.  Longitudinal studies of fetal growth with the use of dynamic image ultrasonography. , 1982, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  I Buvat,et al.  The impact of choice of reference charts and equations on the assessment of fetal biometry , 2005, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[6]  E. Ferrazzi,et al.  Fitting growth curves to head and abdomen measurements of the fetus: A multicentric study , 1987, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[7]  F. Padula,et al.  Analysis of fetal biometric measurements in the last 30 years. , 2008, Journal of prenatal medicine.

[8]  D. Bruzzese,et al.  Fetal size charts for the Italian population. Normative curves of head, abdomen and long bones , 2005, Prenatal diagnosis.

[9]  A. R. Frisancho Physical Status: The Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry , 1996, The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[10]  Y. Jacquemyn,et al.  Fetal biometry in different ethnic groups. , 2000, Early human development.

[11]  F. P. Hadlock,et al.  Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements--a prospective study. , 1985, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  D. Altman,et al.  Charts of fetal size: 1. Methodology , 1994, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[13]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Fetal biometry at 14–40 weeks' gestation , 1994, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[14]  J. Gardosi,et al.  An adjustable fetal weight standard , 1995, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[15]  D. Altman,et al.  Charts of Fetal Size , 1994 .