A novel hybrid MCDM approach for outsourcing supplier selection

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to determine the criteria weights of outsourcing and their key role in ranking outsourcing suppliers. Design/methodology/approach A new hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach merges three tools, namely, decision making trial and evaluation (DEMATLE), fuzzy analytic network process (FANP) and ordinal/cardinal data envelopment analysis (DEA) model. Afterwards, experts’ opinions were gathered from a Pipe and Fittings company. Finally, their opinions were incorporated in three-stage approach for outsourcing suppliers’ selection. Findings The findings of this study show that among the selective criteria for outsourcing, business development, focus on basic activities and order delays are the three most important criteria. Also, the proposed approach ranks suppliers to facilitate decision making for selection. Research limitations/implications The number of suppliers, selection criteria and the number of members of the respondents’ team have been identified as some of the limitations of the present study. Practical implications The study has significant and practical implications for the managers and for the organizations which have to choose top suppliers, particularly in the case of dealing with numerous and qualitative/quantitative criteria. Originality/value This paper proposed a new three-stage approach that incorporates outputs of previous as inputs of next stage to increasing results accuracy. Also, it showed that by incorporating results of FANP method into DEA model, key role of experts’ opinions as a qualitative and quantitative criteria can be caused by increasing flexibility of decision process.

[1]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  Evaluating performance of engineering departments in an Indian University using DEMATEL and compromise ranking methods , 2015 .

[2]  Lori Tavasszy,et al.  Supplier selection in the airline retail industry using a funnel methodology: Conjunctive screening method and fuzzy AHP , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[3]  E. Ertugrul Karsak,et al.  An integrated supplier selection methodology incorporating QFD and DEA with imprecise data , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[4]  Ravi Kant,et al.  Knowledge management adoption in supply chain , 2014 .

[5]  James Nga-Kwok Liu,et al.  Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[6]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process: Economic, Political, Social and Technological Applications with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks , 2013 .

[7]  Chao-Che Hsu,et al.  Integrating DANP and modified grey relation theory for the selection of an outsourcing provider , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  A new DEA model for technology selection in the presence of ordinal data , 2013 .

[9]  Siba Sankar Mahapatra,et al.  Decision making for selecting 3PL service provider using three parameter interval grey numbers , 2013 .

[10]  Pravin Kumar,et al.  A fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methodology to evaluate 3PL in a supply chain , 2012 .

[11]  Mahdi Yousefi Nejad Attari,et al.  A Decision Making Model for Outsourcing of Manufacturing Activities by ANP and DEMATEL Under Fuzzy Environment , 2012 .

[12]  Rong-Ho Lin,et al.  An integrated model for supplier selection under a fuzzy situation , 2012 .

[13]  S. F. Ghomi,et al.  Solid waste facilities location using of analytical network process and data envelopment analysis approaches. , 2012, Waste management.

[14]  Mei-Sung Kang,et al.  Applications of FANP and BOCR in Renewable Energy—Study on the Choice of the Sites for Wind Farms , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[15]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  Supplier evaluation in manufacturing environment using compromise ranking method with grey interval numbers , 2012 .

[16]  Wen Li Geng,et al.  Selection of Outsourcing Supplier Based on AHP , 2012 .

[17]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[18]  Bo Feng,et al.  Identifying risk factors of IT outsourcing using interdependent information: An extended DEMATEL method , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[19]  Saeed Tajdini,et al.  IS Outsourcing Decision: A Quantitative Approach , 2012 .

[20]  Mehdi Toloo,et al.  A new DEA method for supplier selection in presence of both cardinal and ordinal data , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[21]  Chao-Che Hsu,et al.  A hybrid model for selection of an outsourcing provider , 2011 .

[22]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  SUPPLIER SELECTION USING COMPROMISE RANKING AND OUTRANKING METHODS , 2011 .

[23]  Nihan Çetin Demirel,et al.  Supplier selection problem in global supply chains by AHP and ANP approaches under fuzzy environment , 2011 .

[24]  Pradeep Kumar,et al.  Analytical modeling of third party service provider selection in lead logistics provider environments , 2010 .

[25]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  A novel hybrid MCDM approach for outsourcing vendor selection: A case study for a semiconductor company in Taiwan , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  James J. H. Liou,et al.  Developing a hybrid multi-criteria model for selection of outsourcing providers , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[27]  Xiaowei Xu,et al.  Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  I-Shuo Chen,et al.  Using a novel conjunctive MCDM approach based on DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP, and TOPSIS as an innovation support system for Taiwanese higher education , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[29]  Hamed Rafiei,et al.  Designing a decision support system to evaluate and select suppliers using fuzzy analytic network process , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[30]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Information systems outsourcing decisions using a group decision-making approach , 2009, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[31]  Amy Hsin-I Lee,et al.  A fuzzy supplier selection model with the consideration of benefits, opportunities, costs and risks , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[32]  Ozden Ustun,et al.  Analytic network process and multi-period goal programming integration in purchasing decisions , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[33]  Selin Soner Kara,et al.  Long term supplier selection using a combined fuzzy MCDM approach: A case study for a telecommunication company , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[34]  Li Chun-Hao,et al.  An ANP with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks for Selecting Suppliers , 2008, 2008 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing.

[35]  Ezgi Aktar Demirtaş,et al.  An integrated multiobjective decision making process for supplier selection and order allocation , 2008 .

[36]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Suppliers selection in the presence of both cardinal and ordinal data , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[37]  A. Ravi Ravindran,et al.  Vendor selection in outsourcing , 2007, Comput. Oper. Res..

[38]  Wei Guo,et al.  An Application of ANP with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks in Supplier Selection: A Case Study in a Diesel Engine Manufacturing Firm , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics.

[39]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Technologies ranking in the presence of both cardinal and ordinal data , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[40]  Ian Paul McCarthy,et al.  The impact of outsourcing on the transaction costs and boundaries of manufacturing , 2004 .

[41]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[42]  Fong-Yuen Ding,et al.  Using data envelopment analysis to compare suppliers for supplier selection and performance improvement , 2000 .

[43]  Ulli Arnold New dimensions of outsourcing: a combination of transaction cost economics and the core competencies concept , 2000 .

[44]  L. Zadeh Fuzzy sets , 1996 .

[45]  L. Seiford,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis in the Presence of Both Quantitative and Qualitative Factors , 1996 .

[46]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  On the Use of Ordinal Data in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1993 .

[47]  T. Sexton,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and Extensions , 1986 .

[48]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[49]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Multi Criteria Supplier Selection Using Fuzzy PROMETHEE Method , 2014, Supply Chain Management Under Fuzziness.

[50]  Adli Mustafa,et al.  Cross-ranking of Decision Making Units in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2013 .

[51]  M. N. Asli,et al.  Providing a suitable model for supplier selection in outsourcing using Fuzzy VIKOR decision making method , 2012 .

[52]  S. Vinodh,et al.  Application of fuzzy analytic network process for supplier selection in a manufacturing organisation , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[53]  Ahmad Makui,et al.  South African Journal of Industrial Engineering November 2011 Vol 22(2):216-226 ANALYSING THE IMPACT OF THE PRODUCT LIFE CYCLE ON THE IMPORTANCE OF OUTSOURCING DECISION-MAKING CRITERIA: A MANUFACTURING CASE STUDY , 2011 .

[54]  Dinesh Kumar,et al.  A Fuzzy AHP Model for 3PL Selection in Lead Logistics Provider Scenarios , 2010 .

[55]  Ali Pirannejad,et al.  Outsourcing priorities of government functions: Analytic network process approach , 2010 .

[56]  Dinesh Kumar,et al.  Integrated model for selection of third party service providers by global lead logistics providers , 2009, Int. J. Bus. Perform. Supply Chain Model..

[57]  E. Ertugrul Karsak,et al.  Using data envelopment analysis for evaluating flexible manufacturing systems in the presence of imprecise data , 2008 .

[58]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process : the organization and prioritization of complexity , 1996 .

[59]  A. Gabus,et al.  World Problems, An Invitation to Further Thought within the Framework of DEMATEL , 1972 .