Motion-Perception Deficits and Reading Impairment

We tested the hypothesis that deficits on sensory-processing tasks frequently associated with poor reading and dyslexia are the result of impairments in external-noise exclusion, rather than motion perception or magnocellular processing. We compared the motion-direction discrimination thresholds of adults and children with good or poor reading performance, using coherent-motion displays embedded in external noise. Both adults and children who were poor readers had higher thresholds than their respective peers in the presence of high external noise, but not in the presence of low external noise or when the signal was clearly demarcated. Adults' performance in high external noise correlated with their general reading ability, whereas children's performance correlated with their language and verbal abilities. The results support the hypothesis that noise-exclusion deficits impair reading and language development and suggest that the impact of such deficits on the development of reading skills changes with age.

[1]  B. Levin The Informal Reading Inventory. , 1971 .

[2]  Ron Dumont,et al.  Woodcock‐Johnson III Tests of Achievement , 2008 .

[3]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Deficits in perceptual noise exclusion in developmental dyslexia , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  How parallel are the primate visual pathways? , 1993, Annual review of neuroscience.

[5]  K. Stanovich Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. , 1986 .

[6]  V. Mann,et al.  Speech perception and memory coding in relation to reading ability. , 1983, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[7]  Luis A. Lesmes,et al.  The mechanism of isoluminant chromatic motion perception. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Zhong-Lin Lu,et al.  Slower implicit categorical learning in adult poor readers , 2004, Annals of dyslexia.

[9]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[10]  P. Killeen,et al.  An Alternative to Null-Hypothesis Significance Tests , 2005, Psychological science.

[11]  Jane E. Raymond,et al.  Deficits of motion transparency perception in adult developmental dyslexics with normal unidirectional motion sensitivity , 2002, Vision Research.

[12]  B. Wright,et al.  Learning problems, delayed development, and puberty. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  P. Schiller,et al.  Functional specificity of lateral geniculate nucleus laminae of the rhesus monkey. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  B. Pennington,et al.  Sensory processing, reading, IQ, and attention. , 2004, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[15]  R. Woodcock Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised , 1987 .

[16]  M. Bruck Word-Recognition Skills of Adults with Childhood Diagnoses of Dyslexia. , 1990 .

[17]  C Witton,et al.  Dynamic sensory sensitivity and children's word decoding skills. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Kevin R. Murphy,et al.  Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder : a clinical workbook , 1991 .

[19]  R. Woods,et al.  Abnormal processing of visual motion in dyslexia revealed by functional brain imaging , 1996, Nature.

[20]  J. F. Stein,et al.  Magnocellular visual function and children's single word reading , 1998, Vision Research.

[21]  J. Ziegler,et al.  Deficits in speech perception predict language learning impairment. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  B. Dosher,et al.  External noise distinguishes attention mechanisms , 1998, Vision Research.

[23]  Kevin R. Murphy,et al.  Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A clinical workbook, 2nd ed. , 1998 .

[24]  D. Badcock,et al.  Specific reading disability: differences in contrast sensitivity as a function of spatial frequency. , 1980, Science.

[25]  F. Ramus,et al.  Developmental dyslexia : specific phonological deficit or general sensorimotor dysfunction ? , 2003 .

[26]  P. Tallal,et al.  Neurobiological Basis of Speech: A Case for the Preeminence of Temporal Processing , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[27]  T. Albright,et al.  Image Segmentation Enhances Discrimination of Motion in Visual Noise , 1997, Vision Research.

[28]  Joseph K. Torgesen,et al.  Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing , 1997 .

[29]  W. Weibull A Statistical Distribution Function of Wide Applicability , 1951 .

[30]  D. Heeger,et al.  Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Early Visual Pathways in Dyslexia , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  D. Weinberger,et al.  Genes, dopamine and cortical signal-to-noise ratio in schizophrenia , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.