Activity-Based Costing as a Design Science Artifact

In this paper, we propose to consider the Activity-Based Costing (ABC) method as a design science artifact. We apply the three cycles of design science (i.e., relevance cycle, rigor cycle, and design cycle) to Activity-Based Costing. We argue that some cycles are addressed in literature to a certain extent, but that justificatory knowledge in the rigor cycle is missing. Applying such knowledge can provide valuable insights for systematically evaluating and improving an artifact. Therefore, we propose modularity and entropy as possible candidates for such justificatory knowledge. This paper contributes to ABC research by introducing a scientifically rigorous evaluation. This evaluation indicates several possibilities for design contributions to ABC. Moreover, the relevance of these new artifacts for cost accounting practice are discussed as well.

[1]  Tharam S. Dillon,et al.  On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2011 Workshops - Confederated International Workshops and Posters: EI2N+NSF ICE, ICSP+INBAST, ISDE, ORM, OTMA, SWWS+MONET+SeDeS, and VADER 2011, Hersonissos, Crete, Greece, October 17-21, 2011. Proceedings , 2011, OTM Workshops.

[2]  R. Kaplan.  Innovation Action Research: Creating New Management Theory and Practice , 1998 .

[3]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[4]  Jae-Yoon Jung.  Measuring Entropy in Business Process Models , 2008, 2008 3rd International Conference on Innovative Computing Information and Control.

[5]  J. Aken.  Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-Tested and Grounded Technological Rules , 2004 .

[6]  Ludwig Boltzmann,et al.  Lectures on Gas Theory , 1964 .

[7]  Krsto Pandza,et al.  Management as Design, But What Kind of Design? An Appraisal of the Design Science Analogy for Management , 2010 .

[8]  Mohan Tanniru,et al.  Activity-based justification of IT investments , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[9]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Anatomy of a Design Theory , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Donald A. Sch.  The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action , 1983 .

[11]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[12]  A. Richardson,et al.  Does academic management accounting lag practice? A cliometric study , 2011 .

[13]  Dieter Van Nuffel,et al.  Towards designing modular and evolvable business processes , 2011 .

[14]  Ken Starkey,et al.  Bridging the Relevance Gap: Aligning Stakeholders in the Future of Management Research , 2001 .

[15]  Philip Huysmans,et al.  On the applicability of the notion of entropy for business process analysis , 2012, BMSD 2012.

[16]  Jan Holmström,et al.  Bridging Practice and Theory: A Design Science Approach , 2009, Decis. Sci..

[17]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Measure Costs Right: Make the Right Decisions , 1988 .

[18]  Peter De Bruyn.  Towards Designing Enterprises for Evolvability Based on Fundamental Engineering Concepts , 2011, OTM Workshops.

[19]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[20]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  Building theory in the sciences of the artificial , 2009, DESRIST.

[21]  Arnaldo Camuffo,et al.  The Concept of Modularity in Management Studies: A Literature Review , 2009 .

[22]  Arnaldo Camuffo,et al.  Beyond the "Mirroring" Hypothesis: Product Modularity and Interorganizational Relations in the Air Conditioning Industry , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[23]  K. Palepu.  Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure , 1985 .

[24]  Filip Roodhooft,et al.  Time-driven activity-based costing in an outpatient clinic environment: development, relevance and managerial impact. , 2009, Health policy.

[25]  A. Georges L. Romme,et al.  Making a Difference: Organization as Design , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[26]  Maria Grazia Gnoni,et al.  A scenario analysis for evaluating RFID investments in pallet management , 2010, Int. J. RF Technol. Res. Appl..

[27]  Falconer Mitchell,et al.  Issues in the relationship between theory and practice in management accounting , 2010 .

[28]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Time-driven activity-based costing. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[29]  Mustafa Özbayrak,et al.  Activity-based cost estimation in a push/pull advanced manufacturing system , 2004 .

[30]  Robert S. Kaplan,et al.  Management accounting (1984-1994): development of new practice and theory , 1994 .

[31]  A. Rashad Abdel-Khalik.  The Entropy Law, Accounting Data, and Relevance to Decision-Making , 1974 .

[32]  Poul Israelsen,et al.  Activity-based costing as a method for assessing the economics of modularization—A case study and beyond , 2006 .

[33]  Kris Ven,et al.  The transformation of requirements into software primitives: Studying evolvability based on systems theoretic stability , 2011, Sci. Comput. Program..

[34]  Peter Robinson,et al.  The cost of library services: Activity-based costing in an Australian academic library , 1998 .

[35]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  The Three Cycle View of Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Baruch Lev,et al.  The Aggregation Problem in Financial Statements: An Informational Approach , 1968 .

[37]  David Dugdale,et al.  The ABC bandwagon and the juggernaut of modernity , 2002 .

[38]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Bounded Rationality and the Search for Organizational Architecture: An Evolutionary Perspective on the Design of Organizations and Their Evolvability , 2004 .

[39]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[40]  Robin Cooper,et al.  How Cost Accounting Systematically Distorts Product Costs , 1987 .

[41]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[42]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  The Mirroring Hypothesis: Theory, Evidence and Exceptions , 2016 .

[43]  C. Drury.  Management and Cost Accounting , 1988 .

[44]  Rob J. Kusters,et al.  Entropy based software processes improvement , 2008, Software Quality Journal.

[45]  Jan Verelst,et al.  Understanding Entropy Generation during the Execution of Business Process Instantiations: An Illustration from Cost Accounting , 2013, EEWC.