An Exploratory Assessment Of The Linkages Between Hrm Practices, Absorptive Capacity, And Innovation In Outsourcing Relationships

This paper explores the relationship between innovation outcomes, absorptive capacity and human resource management practices in information technology outsourcing relationships. Previous research has highlighted the need for absorptive capacity to achieve innovation in organizations. Since this absorptive capacity is likely to be embodied within the relationship management teams of both the supplier and client in outsourcing dyads, the human resource practices of the participating firms should have a direct bearing on levels of absorptive capacity and innovation outcomes for the relationships. This research examined four large IT relationships as case studies and presents a model of inter-organizational innovation that shows the necessity of developing the appropriate absorptive capacity to achieve innovation in outsourcing environments. From this model, the research presents three HRM practices that can help develop absorptive capacity to support innovation activities: retention of client employees with firm-specific business process knowledge rather than technical knowledge; minimization of legacy hiring practices for suppliers; and maintaining and optimal work group size for relationship management teams on both the client and supplier sides of the relationship.

[1]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[2]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  The Relationship Advantage: Information Technologies, Sourcing, and Management , 2001 .

[3]  Ola Bergström,et al.  Externalization of employees: thinking about going somewhere else , 2001 .

[4]  C. R. Greer,et al.  Human resource management outsourcing: The make or buy decision , 1999 .

[5]  Matt E. Thatcher,et al.  Managing the Knowledge Supply Chain: An Organizational Learning Model of Information Technology Offshore Outsourcing , 2008, MIS Q..

[6]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Average Tenure of Academic Department Heads: The Effects of Paradigm, Size, and Departmental Demography. , 1980 .

[7]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  The Relationship Advantage: Information Technologies, Sourcing, and Management , 2002 .

[8]  Jie Shen,et al.  Outsourcing HR as a Competitive Strategy? A literature review and an assessment of implications , 2005 .

[9]  Kevin J. Davis,et al.  Technology and Knowledge Transfer within Outsourcing Relationships: The Development of a Model of Interorganizational Innovation , 2007 .

[10]  K. Williams,et al.  Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing , 1979 .

[11]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  IT and business process outsourcing: the knowledge potential , 2004 .

[12]  C. Lengnick-Hall,et al.  HR, ERP, and knowledge for competitive advantage , 2006 .

[13]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Managing Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity: How Do Organizational Antecedents Matter? , 2005 .

[14]  W. Ouchi,et al.  Defining the Span of Control. , 1974 .

[15]  Paul S. Adler,et al.  Making the HR Outsourcing Decision , 2007 .

[16]  M. Miozzo,et al.  Institutional Effects on the IT Outsourcing Market: Analysing Clients, Suppliers and Staff Transfer in Germany and the UK , 2006 .

[17]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma , 1997 .

[18]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[19]  A. Vinding Absorptive Capacity and Innovative Performance: A Human Capital Approach , 2006 .

[20]  Wai Fong Boh,et al.  FIRM-SPECIFIC HUMAN CAPITAL AND COMPENSATION-ORGANIZATIONAL TENURE PROFILES: AN ARCHIVAL ANALYSIS OF SALARY DATA FOR IT PROFESSIONALS , 1904 .

[21]  D. Ulrich,et al.  A new mandate for human resources. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[22]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Relationships in it outsourcing: a stakeholder perspective , 2000 .

[23]  E. Lawler,et al.  PROPERTIES OF ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE IN RELATION TO JOB ATTITUDES AND JOB BEHAVIOR. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  S. Guastello Catastrophe modeling of the accident process: Organizational subunit size. , 1988 .

[25]  H. John Bernardin,et al.  Human Resource Management: An Experiential Approach , 1997 .

[26]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery , 2003 .

[27]  Cynthia LeRouge,et al.  Managing on the edge of change: Human resource management of information technology employees , 2007 .

[28]  M. Belcourt,et al.  Outsourcing — The benefits and the risks , 2006 .

[29]  Michael R. Weeks,et al.  Outsourcing: From Cost Management to Innovation and Business Value , 2008 .

[30]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[31]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[32]  Wendy L. Currie,et al.  The supply‐side of IT outsourcing: the trend towards mergers, acquisitions and joint ventures , 2000 .

[33]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Inter-firm alliances: Analysis and design , 1999 .

[34]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct , 2006 .

[35]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[36]  Mark A. Huselid,et al.  HR as a Source of Shareholder Value: Research and Recommendations , 1997 .

[37]  R. Gooding,et al.  A Meta-Analytic Review of the Relationship between Size and Performance: The Productivity and Efficiency of Organizations and Their Subunits. , 1985 .

[38]  M. J. Earl,et al.  The Risks of Outsourcing IT , 1996 .

[39]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Social Loafing in Technology-Supported Teams , 2008, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[40]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[41]  S. Helper,et al.  NETWORK INTERACTIONS AND MUTUAL DEPENDENCE: A TEST IN THE CAR INDUSTRY , 2000 .

[42]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[43]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.