Finite state transducers for policy evaluation and conflict resolution

This work presents a formal framework for a policy representation model based on finite state transducers (FSTs). The main motivation for this approach is to produce the formalities to represent the body of policies in an unambiguous way. Using well-known entities such as finite state machines, we propose interpretations and adaptations to the basic theory to fit in the domain of policy based management. Policies are modeled as finite state transducers that consume events, and a function we call a tautness function is defined to be on the transitions. The operations of finite state transducers are revised accordingly. In particular, we present determinization and intersection operations for FSTs that will mimic the modality conflict resolution process between policies. We also demonstrate how the composition of transducers could be used to express constraints or meta-policies. In our approach, all the tasks associated with the conflict resolution process can be done "a priori," and the computing of a policy-evaluation is linear in the number of events, and independent of the number of policies.

[1]  Emmanuel Roche,et al.  Finite-State Language Processing , 1997 .

[2]  Timothy W. Finin,et al.  A policy language for a pervasive computing environment , 2003, Proceedings POLICY 2003. IEEE 4th International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks.

[3]  Yechiam Yemini,et al.  Managing Communication Networks by Monitoring Databases , 1991, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[4]  Jorge Lobo,et al.  Conflict Resolution Using Logic Programming , 2003, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[5]  Morris Sloman,et al.  Policy driven management for distributed systems , 1994, Journal of Network and Systems Management.

[6]  Alessandra Russo,et al.  Using event calculus to formalise policy specification and analysis , 2003, Proceedings POLICY 2003. IEEE 4th International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks.

[7]  Jadwiga Indulska,et al.  Dynamic conflict detection in policy-based management systems , 2002, Proceedings. Sixth International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing.

[8]  V. S. Subrahmanian,et al.  Heterogeneous Active Agents , 1998 .

[9]  Gertjan van Noord,et al.  Finite State Transducers with Predicates and Identities , 2001, Grammars.

[10]  Bruce G. Lindsay,et al.  On Maintaining Priorities in a Production Rule System , 1991, VLDB.

[11]  Masum Z. Hasan,et al.  An active temporal model for network management databases , 1995, Integrated Network Management.

[12]  Emil C. Lupu,et al.  Conflicts in Policy-Based Distributed Systems Management , 1999, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[13]  Alberto O. Mendelzon,et al.  Managing Conflicts Between Rules , 1999, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[14]  Jeffrey D. Ullman,et al.  Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages and Computation , 1979 .

[15]  Mehryar Mohri,et al.  Finite-State Transducers in Language and Speech Processing , 1997, CL.

[16]  V. S. Subrahmanian,et al.  Heterogeneous Active Agents, I: Semantics , 1999, Artif. Intell..

[17]  Nancy Martin,et al.  Programming Expert Systems in OPS5 - An Introduction to Rule-Based Programming(1) , 1985, Int. CMG Conference.