Comparison of uterine exteriorization and in situ repair during cesarean sections

[1]  P. Brocklehurst.  The CORONIS Trial: International study of caesarean section surgical techniques: a randomised fractional factorial randomised trial Brocklehurst P on behalf of The CORONIS Trial Collaborative Group(1-10) , 2013 .

[2]  M. Mathai,et al.  Abdominal surgical incisions for caesarean section. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[3]  K. Abd-El-Maeboud,et al.  Gum chewing stimulates early return of bowel motility after caesarean section , 2009, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[4]  S. Walsh,et al.  Extraabdominal vs intraabdominal uterine repair at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis. , 2009, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  E. Orji,et al.  A randomised controlled trial of uterine exteriorisation and non‐exteriorisation at caesarean section , 2008, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[6]  L. Katz,et al.  Uterine Exteriorization Compared With In Situ Repair at Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2008, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  G. Hofmeyr,et al.  Techniques for caesarean section. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[8]  J. Dungan.  Complications of Exteriorized Compared With In Situ Uterine Repair at Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2008 .

[9]  S. Gates,et al.  Techniques and materials for closure of the abdominal wall in caesarean section. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[10]  G. Hofmeyr,et al.  Extra-abdominal versus intra-abdominal repair of the uterine incision at caesarean section. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[11]  G. Hofmeyr,et al.  Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section. , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[12]  F. Alderdice,et al.  Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section. , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[13]  I. Russell,et al.  A randomised, controlled study of uterine exteriorization and repair at caesarean section , 1999, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[14]  E. Edi-Osagie,et al.  Uterine exteriorisation at caesarean section: influence on maternal morbidity , 1998, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[15]  J. Morrison,et al.  Infectious morbidity, operative blood loss, and length of the operative procedure after cesarean delivery by method of placental removal and site of uterine repair. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[16]  S. Finkler,et al.  A Randomized Trial of Early Hospital Discharge and Home Follow-Up of Women Having Cesarean Birth , 1994, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  D. Chi,et al.  Nonfatal Venous Air Embolism During Cesarean Section: A Case Report and Review of the Literature , 1994, Obstetrical & gynecological survey.

[18]  J. Morrison,et al.  Blood loss at time of cesarean section by method of placental removal and exteriorization versus in situ repair of the uterine incision. , 1993, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[19]  Quilligan Ej,et al.  Extraabdominal uterine exteriorization at cesarean section. , 1978 .

[20]  E. Quilligan,et al.  Extraabdominal Uterine Exteriorization at Cesarean Section , 1978, Obstetrics and gynecology.