Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics, Tactile and Uniqueness Needs of Fashion Consumers

The purposes of this study were to determine whether fashion consumer groups (fashion followers, fashion innovators, fashion opinion leaders and innovative communicators) differ in centrality of visual product aesthetics, consumers&apos' need for uniqueness and need for touch, and to examine possible correlations among these variables. Fashion design and merchandizing students completed the following scales: Need for Touch, Consumers&apos' Need for Uniqueness, Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics, Measure of Fashion Innovativeness and Opinion Leadership plus demographic information. Innovative communicators had a greater need for uniqueness than followers and opinion leaders, but not than innovators. Fashion followers scored lower on Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics than did innovative communicators, innovators and opinion leaders. There was no difference in Need for Touch among fashion consumer groups. Scores on Need for Touch were positively correlated with scores on Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics and Consumers&apos' Need for Uniqueness. Scores on Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics were positively correlated with scores on Consumers&apos' Need for Uniqueness. Scores on Fashion Innovativeness and Opinion Leadership were positively correlated with scores on Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics and Consumers&apos' Need for Uniqueness. Scores on Fashion Innovativeness and Opinion Leadership were not significantly correlated with those on Need for Touch. Fashion consumer groups did differ in centrality of visual product aesthetics and need for uniqueness, but not in need for touch.

[1]  Nimet Uray,et al.  Identifying Fashion Clothing Innovators by Self-Report Method , 1998 .

[2]  J. Eicher.  Dress and Ethnicity , 1995 .

[3]  Ann Marie Fiore,et al.  Understanding Aesthetics for the Merchandising and Design Professional , 1996 .

[4]  Todd J. Arnold,et al.  Individual Differences in the Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics: Concept and Measurement , 2003 .

[5]  R. Goldsmith,et al.  Social Values and Fashion Leadership , 1991 .

[6]  Christopher M. Miller,et al.  Toward Formalizing Fashion Theory , 1993 .

[7]  Jane E. Workman,et al.  Fashion consumers and fashion problem recognition style , 2006 .

[8]  Barry Turner,et al.  Successful product design: Bill Hollins and Stuart Pugh, Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd, Guildford, 1990, £35.00 , 1991 .

[9]  M. Holbrook.  Aims, Concepts, and Methods for the Representation of Individual Differences in Esthetic Responses to Design Features , 1986 .

[10]  Linda L. Price,et al.  An Investigation into the Social Context of Early Adoption Behavior , 1992 .

[11]  J. Workman,et al.  Relationships Among Fashion Consumer Groups, Locus of Control, Boredom Proneness, Boredom Coping and Intrinsic Enjoyment , 2007 .

[12]  Diana L. Haytko,et al.  Speaking of Fashion: Consumers' Uses of Fashion Discourses and the Appropriation of Countervailing Cultural Meanings , 1997 .

[13]  Denise M. Johnson,et al.  Effects of female adolescent locus of control on shopping behaviour, fashion orientation and information search , 1993 .

[14]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  Individual Differences in Haptic Information Processing: The "Need for Touch" Scale , 2003 .

[15]  J. Workman,et al.  Fashion Groups, Gender, and Boredom Proneness , 2004 .

[16]  Jill Oakes,et al.  Eider Skin Garments Used by the Ungava Unuit from the Belcher Islands, Northwest Territories: Construction and Context , 1992 .

[17]  Judy A. Siguaw,et al.  Aesthetic Consumption Differences in Asian-American and Anglo Subcultures: , 1995 .

[18]  R. Goldsmith,et al.  Consumers' Ethnocentrism and Fashion Leadership , 1998 .

[19]  Nancy F. Stanforth.  Fashion Innovators, Sensation Seekers, and Clothing Individualists , 1995 .

[20]  Kelly Tian,et al.  Categories, contexts, and conflicts of consumers' nonconformity experiences , 1997 .

[21]  Jane E. Workman,et al.  An Analysis of Cross-Cultural Differences in Perceptual Modality Preferences of Fashion Design and Merchandising Students from South Korea, Swaziland, and the United States , 2005 .

[22]  Jane E. Workman,et al.  Relationship of Optimum Stimulation Level to Fashion Behavior , 1996 .

[23]  Charles F. Hofacker,et al.  Measuring Consumer Innovativeness , 1991 .

[24]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  Measurement of Individual Differences in Visual Versus Verbal Information Processing , 1985 .

[25]  E. Hirschman,et al.  An Examination of Innovative Communicators, Opinion Leaders and Innovators For Men's Fashion Apparel , 1978 .

[26]  Kelly Tepper Tian,et al.  Consumers' Need for Uniqueness: Scale Development and Validation , 2001 .

[27]  Richard H. Nagasawa,et al.  Construction of An SI Theory of Fashion: Part 1. Ambivalence and Change , 1995 .

[28]  Jane E. Workman,et al.  Use of the Need for Uniqueness Scale to Characterize Fashion Consumer Groups , 2000 .

[29]  Joanne Eicher,et al.  Dress and Identity , 1992 .

[30]  J. Eicher,et al.  Definition and classification of dress:Implications for analysis of gender roles , 1992 .

[31]  S. Kaiser.  The Social Psychology of Clothing: Symbolic Appearances in Context , 1996 .

[32]  Jane E. Workman,et al.  Fashion Opinion Leadership, Fashion Innovativeness, and Need for Variety , 1993 .

[33]  Ronald E. Goldsmith,et al.  Fashion Leaders' and Followers' Attitudes Toward Buying Domestic and Imported Apparel , 2000 .

[34]  Peter H. Bloch.  Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response , 1995 .