Effect of vehicle type on the performance of second generation air bags for child occupants.

Passenger air bags experienced considerable design modification in the late 1990s, principally to mitigate risks to child passengers. This study utilized Data from the Partners for Child Passenger Safety study, a large-scale child-focused crash surveillance system, to examine the effect of vehicle type on the differential performance of first and second generation air bags on injuries to restrained children in frontal impact crashes. Our results show that the benefit of second-generation air bags was seen in passenger cars - those children exposed to second-generation air bags were half as likely to sustain a serious injury - and minivans. However, in SUVs the data suggest no reduction in injury risk with the new designs. This field data provides crucial real-world experience to the automotive industry as they work towards the next generation of air bag designs.

[1]  John E. Hinger,et al.  Advanced Air Bag Systems and Occupant Protection: Recent Modifications to FMVSS 208 , 2001 .

[2]  Kristy B. Arbogast,et al.  DIFFERENCES IN AIR BAG PERFORMANCE WITH CHILDREN IN VARIOUS RESTRAINT CONFIGURATIONS AND VEHICLE TYPES , 2003 .

[3]  M Segui-Gomez,et al.  Changes in injury patterns in frontal crashes: preliminary comparisons of drivers of vehicles model years 1993-1997 to drivers of vehicles 1998-2001. , 2002, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[4]  Kennerly Digges,et al.  Performance of Depowered Air Bags in Real World Crashes , 2002 .

[5]  E. K. Moll,et al.  Development and validation of the injury severity assessment survey/parent report: a new injury severity assessment survey. , 1999, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[6]  F K Winston,et al.  Partners for child passenger safety: a unique child-specific crash surveillance system. , 2001, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  THORACIC RESPONSE AND TRAUMA OF OUT-OF-POSITION DRIVERS RESULTING FROM AIR BAG DEPLOYMENT , 1997 .

[8]  Alan German,et al.  SUPPLEMENTAL RESTRAINT SYSTEMS: FRIEND OR FOE TO BELTED OCCUPANTS? , 1996 .

[9]  M W Dowdy,et al.  ADVANCED AIR BAG TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT , 1998 .

[10]  Kaye Sullivan,et al.  Where Are All the Children Seated and When Are They Restrained , 1997 .

[11]  Dainius J. Dalmotas.  Assessments of air bag performance based on the 5th percentile female hybrid iii crash test dummy , 1998 .

[12]  Toru Kiuchi.  A SIMULATION STUDY ON INFLATION INDUCED INJURY AND NCAP WITH DEPOWERED AIR BAG , 1998 .

[13]  William T. Hollowell,et al.  PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF DUAL STAGE PASSENGER AIR BAG SYSTEMS , 2001 .

[14]  David S. Zuby,et al.  Analysis of Driver Fatalities in Frontal Crashes of Airbag-Equipped Vehicles in 1990-98 NASS/CDS , 2001 .

[15]  T F Nelson,et al.  The effect of passenger airbags on child seating behavior in motor vehicles. , 1999, Pediatrics.

[16]  John Hinch,et al.  AIR BAG TECHNOLOGY IN LIGHT PASSENGER VEHICLES , 1999 .

[17]  Kristy B Arbogast,et al.  Risk of injury to restrained children from passenger airbags. , 2002, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.