Exploiting Activity for the Modeling and Simulation of Dynamics and Learning Processes in Hierarchical (Neurocognitive) Systems

Although modeling and simulation depend on each other, there is no means to formally simplify models and corresponding simulations at the same time. The activity concept elicits the coordination and the number of computations of a system, highlighting salient features about its dynamics. I follow here a neurocognitive example linking and applying definitions and algorithms based on an (neuronal) activity measure. At the modeling level, activity state regions are identified dynamically. At the simulation level, I present how to track the activity region at the component level. At the learning level, I finally present an activity-based search algorithm that is able to find the best components (actions) in a network (a series of actions). Activity regions are used hierarchically from neurons to actions.

[1]  John H. Holland,et al.  Studying Complex Adaptive Systems , 2006, J. Syst. Sci. Complex..

[2]  Jacques Gautrais,et al.  SpikeNET: A simulator for modeling large networks of integrate and fire neurons , 1999, Neurocomputing.

[3]  P. Lennie The Cost of Cortical Computation , 2003, Current Biology.

[4]  Wolf Singer,et al.  Neuronal Synchrony: A Versatile Code for the Definition of Relations? , 1999, Neuron.

[5]  Saurabh Mittal,et al.  Harnessing emergence: the control and design of emergent behavior in system of systems engineering , 2015, SummerSim.

[6]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Non-invasive detection of high gamma band activity during motor imagery , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[7]  Bernard P. Zeigler,et al.  Refounding of the activity concept? Towards a federative paradigm for modeling and simulation , 2013, Simul..

[8]  Yasuhiko Takahara,et al.  General Systems Theory: Mathematical Foundations , 1975 .

[9]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  Steps toward Artificial Intelligence , 1995, Proceedings of the IRE.

[10]  Jean François Santucci,et al.  Modelling and simulation of ecological propagation processes: application to fire spread , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[11]  Bernard P. Zeigler,et al.  Activity-Based Credit Assignment Heuristic for Simulation-Based Stochastic Search in a Hierarchical Model Base of Systems , 2017, IEEE Systems Journal.

[12]  E. D’Angelo The human brain project. , 2012, Functional neurology.

[13]  David R. C. Hill,et al.  Parallel and pseudorandom discrete event system specification vs. networks of spiking neurons: Formalization and preliminary implementation results , 2016, 2016 International Conference on High Performance Computing & Simulation (HPCS).

[14]  Jean,et al.  The Computer and the Brain , 1989, Annals of the History of Computing.

[15]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[16]  Bernard P. Zeigler,et al.  Theory of Modeling and Simulation: Discrete Event & Iterative System Computational Foundations , 2018 .

[17]  A. Grace,et al.  The control of firing pattern in nigral dopamine neurons: burst firing , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  Bernard P. Zeigler,et al.  Iterative Specification as a Modeling and Simulation Formalism for I/O General Systems , 2018, IEEE Systems Journal.

[19]  Steve B. Furber,et al.  Modeling Spiking Neural Networks on SpiNNaker , 2010, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[20]  James Nutaro,et al.  How to apply Amdahl's law to multithreaded multicore processors , 2017, J. Parallel Distributed Comput..

[21]  Marc-Oliver Gewaltig,et al.  NEST by Example: An Introduction to the Neural Simulation Tool NEST , 2012 .

[22]  Bernard P. Zeigler,et al.  Introduction to the Activity Tracking Paradigm in Component-Based Simulation , 2007 .

[23]  P. Coquillard,et al.  Optimal phenotypic plasticity in a stochastic environment minimises the cost/benefit ratio , 2012, 1205.6194.

[24]  Hans Vangheluwe,et al.  Activity regions for the specification of discrete event systems , 2010, SpringSim.

[25]  S. Thorpe,et al.  Spike times make sense , 2005, Trends in Neurosciences.

[26]  Bernard P. Zeigler,et al.  A CONJECTURE FROM LEARNING SIMULATIONS OF SERIES AND PARALLEL CONNECTIONS OF COMPONENTS , 2014, ANSS 2014.

[27]  Ad Aertsen,et al.  Stable propagation of synchronous spiking in cortical neural networks , 1999, Nature.

[28]  Rick Salay,et al.  Modeling Frames , 2017, MODELS.