Desktop software to identify patients eligible for recruitment into a clinical trial: using SARMA to recruit to the ROAD feasibility trial.

BACKGROUND Recruitment to trials in primary care is often difficult, particularly when practice staff need to identify study participants with acute conditions during consultations. The Scottish Acute Recruitment Management Application (SARMA) system is linked to general practice electronic medical record (EMR) systems and is designed to provide recruitment support to multi-centre trials by screening patients against trial inclusion criteria and alerting practice staff if the patient appears eligible. For patients willing to learn more about the trial, the software allows practice staff to send the patient's contact details to the research team by text message. AIM To evaluate the ability of the software to support trial recruitment. DESIGN OF STUDY Software evaluation embedded in a randomised controlled trial. SETTING Five general practices in Tayside and Fife, Scotland. METHODS SARMA was used to support recruitment to a feasibility trial (the Response to Oral Agents in Diabetes, or ROAD trial) looking at users of oral therapy in diabetes. The technical performance of the software and its utility as a recruitment tool were evaluated. RESULTS The software was successfully installed at four of the five general practices and recruited 11 of the 29 participants for ROAD (other methods were letter and direct invitation by a practice nurse) and had a recruitment return of 35% (11 of 31 texts sent led to a recruitment). Screen failures were relatively low (7 of 31 referred). Practice staff members were positive about the system. CONCLUSION An automated recruitment tool can support primary care trials in Scotland and has the potential to support recruitment in other jurisdictions. It offers a low-cost supplement to other trial recruitment methods and is likely to have a much lower screen failure rate than blanket approaches such as mailshots and newspaper campaigns.

[1]  Frank Sullivan,et al.  Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials. , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[2]  David J Torgerson,et al.  Increasing recruitment to randomised trials: a review of randomised controlled trials , 2006, BMC medical research methodology.

[3]  Arianne P Verhagen,et al.  Survey among 78 studies showed that Lasagna's law holds in Dutch primary care research. , 2007, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[4]  P. Bower,et al.  Improving recruitment to health research in primary care. , 2009, Family practice.

[5]  G. Wright,et al.  Primary care computing in England and Scotland: a comparison with Denmark. , 2006, Informatics in primary care.

[6]  Alison Hinds,et al.  Data confidentiality and data handling in research: a workshop report. , 2008, Informatics in primary care.

[7]  C Ohmann,et al.  Future Developments of Medical Informatics from the Viewpoint of Networked Clinical Research , 2009, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[8]  R. Hornung,et al.  Effect of a clinical trial alert system on physician participation in trial recruitment. , 2005, Archives of internal medicine.

[9]  C. Schoen,et al.  On the front lines of care: primary care doctors' office systems, experiences, and views in seven countries. , 2006, Health affairs.

[10]  J. Parry,et al.  How evidence based are recruitment strategies to randomized controlled trials in primary care? Experience from seven studies. , 2003, Family practice.

[11]  Claire Snowdon,et al.  Does it matter if clinicians recruiting for a trial don't understand what the trial is really about? Qualitative study of surgeons' experiences of participation in a pragmatic multi-centre RCT , 2007, Trials.