Does quality of life in patients undergoing shock wave lithotripsy change with repeat procedures: a prospective pilot study from a teaching hospital

Introduction Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is a well-established treatment for kidney stone disease (KSD) and despite its decreased popularity in the past, it has now gained renewed interest due to its minimally invasive nature and good outcomes, especially in the face of COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of our study was to perform a service evaluation to analyse and identify quality of life (QoL) changes [using Urinary Stones and Intervention Quality of Life (USIQoL) questionnaire] after repeat SWL treatments. This would enable a greater understanding of SWL treatment and reduce the current gap of knowledge regarding patient specific outcomes in the field. Material and methods Patients affected by urolithiasias underwent SWL treatment between September 2021 and February 2022 (6 months), were included in the study. A questionnaire was given to the patients in each SWL session and consisted of three main topic areas: a domain on Pain and Physical Health, on Psycho-social Health and on Work (see appendix below). Patients also completed a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in relation to the pain related to the treatment. Data from the questionnaires were collected and analysed. Results A total of 31 patients filled in two or more surveys, with a mean age of 55.8 years. On repeat treatments, pain and physical health domain was significantly better (p = 0.0046), psycho-social health domain was significantly better (p <0.001), work domain was significantly better (p = 0.009) and a correlation [on Visual Analog Scale (VAS)] was observed between pain decreasing in subsequent SWL procedures. Conclusions Our study found that the choice of SWL to treat KSD does improve a patient’s QoL. This could be related to improvement of physical health, psychological and social wellbeing, and ability to work. Higher QoL and low pain scores are observed in relation to repeat SWL treatment and are not directly associated to stone-free status.

[1]  L. Tzelves,et al.  Shockwave Lithotripsy Complications According to Modified Clavien-Dindo Grading System. A Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis in a Sample of 115 Randomized Controlled Trials. , 2021, European urology focus.

[2]  B. Somani,et al.  Gender Differences in Kidney Stone Disease (KSD): Findings from a Systematic Review , 2021, Current Urology Reports.

[3]  B. Somani,et al.  Atlas of scoring systems, grading tools and nomograms in Endourology: A comprehensive overview from The TOWER Endourological Society research group. , 2021, Journal of endourology.

[4]  A. Joyce,et al.  Urinary Stones and Intervention Quality of Life (USIQoL): Development and Validation of a New Core Universal Patient-reported Outcome Measure for Urinary Calculi. , 2021, European urology focus.

[5]  D. Viprakasit,et al.  What is the relationship of stress to patients' kidney stone-related quality of life? , 2020, Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada.

[6]  J. Ziemba,et al.  Health-related quality of life in renal stone formers: are we improving? , 2020, Current opinion in urology.

[7]  H. Joshi,et al.  The impact of urinary stone disease and their treatment on patients’ quality of life: a qualitative study , 2019, Urolithiasis.

[8]  S. Nakada,et al.  Is Stone-Free Status After Surgical Intervention for Kidney Stones Associated with Better Health-Related Quality of Life? - A Multicenter Study from the North American Stone Quality of Life Consortium. , 2019, Urology.

[9]  C. De Nunzio,et al.  Bladder stone management: an update. , 2018, Minerva urologica e nefrologica = The Italian journal of urology and nephrology.

[10]  H. Tiselius,et al.  How can and should we optimize extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy? , 2017, Urolithiasis.

[11]  F. Keeley,et al.  Patient-Reported Outcomes in Nephrolithiasis: Can We Do Better? , 2017, Journal of endourology.

[12]  O. Traxer,et al.  Worldwide Impact of Warmer Seasons on the Incidence of Renal Colic and Kidney Stone Disease: Evidence from a Systematic Review of Literature. , 2017, Journal of endourology.

[13]  S. Nakada,et al.  Validation and Reliability of the Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life Questionnaire , 2017, Journal of Urology.

[14]  Y. Lotan,et al.  Epidemiology of stone disease across the world , 2017, World Journal of Urology.

[15]  B. Somani,et al.  A Complete World Literature Review of Quality of Life (QOL) in Patients with Kidney Stone Disease (KSD) , 2016, Current Urology Reports.

[16]  S. Nakada,et al.  Preliminary Evidence of Decreased Disease-Specific Health-Related Quality of Life in Asymptomatic Stone Patients. , 2016, Journal of endourology.

[17]  Christopher S Saigal,et al.  Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. , 2012, European urology.

[18]  K. Ogan,et al.  Association of depression and urolithiasis. , 2012, Urology.

[19]  J. Leppert,et al.  Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for multiple unilateral intrarenal stones. , 2009, European urology.

[20]  S. Singh,et al.  Management of multiple/staghorn kidney stones: Open surgery versus PCNL (with or without ESWL) , 2009, Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India.

[21]  S. Nakada,et al.  Health related quality of life differs between male and female stone formers. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[22]  J. W. Segura,et al.  Percutaneous removal of small ureteral calculi. , 1985, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  M. Monga,et al.  The evolving epidemiology of stone disease , 2014, Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India.

[24]  B. Eisner,et al.  Ureteroscopy for the management of stone disease , 2010, Nature Reviews Urology.

[25]  K Hoeg,et al.  [Kidney stones]. , 1968, Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke.