Accuracy of multi-point boundary crossing time analysis

Abstract. Recent multi-spacecraft studies of solar wind discontinuity crossings using the timing (boundary plane triangulation) method gave boundary parameter estimates that are significantly different from those of the well-established single-spacecraft minimum variance analysis (MVA) technique. A large survey of directional discontinuities in Cluster data turned out to be particularly inconsistent in the sense that multi-point timing analyses did not identify any rotational discontinuities (RDs) whereas the MVA results of the individual spacecraft suggested that RDs form the majority of events. To make multi-spacecraft studies of discontinuity crossings more conclusive, the present report addresses the accuracy of the timing approach to boundary parameter estimation. Our error analysis is based on the reciprocal vector formalism and takes into account uncertainties both in crossing times and in the spacecraft positions. A rigorous error estimation scheme is presented for the general case of correlated crossing time errors and arbitrary spacecraft configurations. Crossing time error covariances are determined through cross correlation analyses of the residuals. The principal influence of the spacecraft array geometry on the accuracy of the timing method is illustrated using error formulas for the simplified case of mutually uncorrelated and identical errors at different spacecraft. The full error analysis procedure is demonstrated for a solar wind discontinuity as observed by the Cluster FGM instrument.

[1]  J. Volpp,et al.  ESOC Data Products in the CAA , 2010 .

[2]  Hui Zhang,et al.  On the error estimation of multi-spacecraft timing method , 2009 .

[3]  Andreas Albert,et al.  Analysis of Three-Spacecraft Data Using Planar Reciprocal Vectors , 2009 .

[4]  B. Sonnerup,et al.  Discontinuity Orientation, Motion, and Thickness , 2008 .

[5]  M. Neugebauer.  Comment on the abundances of rotational and tangential discontinuities in the solar wind , 2006 .

[6]  T. Knetter.  A new Perspective of the Solar Wind Micro-Structure due to Multi-Point Observations of Discontinuities , 2005 .

[7]  T. Dudok de Wit,et al.  Local wavelet correlation: applicationto timing analysis of multi-satellite CLUSTER data , 2004 .

[8]  T. Horbury,et al.  Four‐point discontinuity observations using Cluster magnetic field data: A statistical survey , 2004 .

[9]  M. Dunlop,et al.  Four-spacecraft determination of magnetopause orientation, motion and thickness: comparison with results from single-spacecraft methods , 2004 .

[10]  B. Tsurutani,et al.  Radial and latitudinal dependencies of discontinuities in the solar wind between 0.3 and 19 AU and 80 and +10 , 2001 .

[11]  T. Horbury,et al.  Three spacecraft observations of solar wind discontinuities , 2001 .

[12]  G. Chanteur.  Accuracy of Fields Gradient Estimations by Cluster: Explanation of its Dependency upon Elongation and Planarity of the Tetrahedron , 2000 .

[13]  G. Chanteur.  Spatial Interpolation for Four Spacecraft: Theory , 1998 .

[14]  P. Robert,et al.  13 - Tetrahedron Geometric Factors , 1998 .

[15]  S. Schwartz.  Shock and Discontinuity Normals, Mach Numbers, and Related Parameters , 1998 .

[16]  Christopher C. Harvey,et al.  Spatial Gradients and the Volumetric Tensor , 1998 .

[17]  B. Sonnerup,et al.  Minimum and Maximum Variance Analysis , 1998 .

[18]  J. Vogt,et al.  Accuracy of Plasma Moment Derivatives , 1998 .

[19]  Malcolm W. Dunlop,et al.  Multi-Spacecraft Discontinuity Analysis: Orientation and Motion , 1998 .

[20]  G. Chanteur,et al.  Surface crossing by a group of satellites: A theoretical study , 1994 .

[21]  M. W. Dunlop,et al.  Analysis of multipoint magnetometer data , 1988 .

[22]  B. Tsurutani,et al.  A reexamination of rotational and tangential discontinuities in the solar wind , 1984 .

[23]  C. Russell,et al.  Multiple spacecraft observations of interplanetary shocks: ISEE three‐dimensional plasma measurements , 1983 .

[24]  R. P. Lepping,et al.  Magnetic field directional discontinuities: Characteristics between 0.46 and 1.0 AU , 1980 .

[25]  B. Tsurutani,et al.  Interplanetary discontinuities: Temporal variations and the radial gradient from 1 to 8.5 AU , 1979 .

[26]  L. Burlaga,et al.  Tangential discontinuities in the solar wind , 1969 .

[27]  L. J. Cahill,et al.  Magnetopause structure and attitude from Explorer 12 observations. , 1967 .