Solving the Towers of Hanoi – how an amoeboid organism efficiently constructs transport networks

SUMMARY Many biological systems require extensive networks to transport resources and information. Biological networks must trade-off network efficiency with the risk of network failure. Yet, biological networks develop in the absence of centralised control from the interactions of many components. Moreover, many biological systems need to be able to adapt when conditions change and the network requires modification. We used the slime mould Physarum polycephalum (Schwein) to study how the organism adapts its network after disruption. To allow us to determine the efficiency of the constructed networks, we used a well-known shortest-path problem: the Towers of Hanoi maze. We first show that while P. polycephalum is capable of building networks with minimal length paths through the maze, most solutions are sub-optimal. We then disrupted the network by severing the main connecting path while opening a new path in the maze. In response to dynamic changes to the environment, P. polycephalum reconstructed more efficient solutions, with all replicates building networks with minimal length paths through the maze after network disruption. While P. polycephalum altered some of its existing network to accommodate changes in the environment, it also reconstructed large sections of the network from scratch. We compared the results obtained from P. polycephalum with those obtained using another distributed biological system: ant colonies. We hypothesise that network construction in ants hinges upon stronger positive feedback than for slime mould, ensuring that ants converge more accurately upon the shortest path but are more constrained by the history of their networks in dynamic environments.

[1]  T. Nakagaki,et al.  Intelligence: Maze-solving by an amoeboid organism , 2000, Nature.

[2]  M. Beekman,et al.  Irrational decision-making in an amoeboid organism: transitivity and context-dependent preferences , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Amos Maritan,et al.  Size and form in efficient transportation networks , 1999, Nature.

[4]  T. Nakagaki,et al.  Smart network solutions in an amoeboid organism. , 2004, Biophysical chemistry.

[5]  E. F. Haskins,et al.  Genetics of Somatic Fusion in PHYSARUM POLYCEPHALUM: the Ppii Strain. , 1972, Genetics.

[6]  Marco Dorigo,et al.  Ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents , 1996, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[7]  A. Tero,et al.  Mathematical Model for Rhythmic Protoplasmic Movement in the True Slime Mold , 2006, Journal of mathematical biology.

[8]  M. Fricker,et al.  Biological solutions to transport network design , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  T. Nakagaki,et al.  Path finding by tube morphogenesis in an amoeboid organism. , 2001, Biophysical chemistry.

[10]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  The expandable network of ant exploration , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  Kazuyuki Aihara,et al.  Amoeba-Based Emergent Computing: Combinatorial Optimization and Autonomous Meta-Problem Solving , 2010, Int. J. Unconv. Comput..

[12]  Dan Romik,et al.  Shortest paths in the Tower of Hanoi graph and finite automata , 2003, SIAM J. Discret. Math..

[13]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Trail geometry gives polarity to ant foraging networks , 2004, Nature.

[14]  E. B. Ridgway,et al.  Control of chemotaxis in Physarum polycephalum , 1976, The Journal of cell biology.

[15]  R. Matthews,et al.  Ants. , 1898, Science.

[16]  Manuel López-Ibáñez,et al.  Ant colony optimization , 2010, GECCO '10.

[17]  James H. Brown,et al.  The fourth dimension of life: fractal geometry and allometric scaling of organisms. , 1999, Science.

[18]  Toshiyuki Nakagaki,et al.  Physarum solver: A biologically inspired method of road-network navigation , 2006 .

[19]  Barbara Webb,et al.  Swarm Intelligence: From Natural to Artificial Systems , 2002, Connect. Sci..

[20]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Optimisation in a natural system: Argentine ants solve the Towers of Hanoi , 2011, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[21]  A. Dussutour,et al.  Slime mold uses an externalized spatial “memory” to navigate in complex environments , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Path selection and foraging efficiency in Argentine ant transport networks , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[23]  Ted J. Case,et al.  Mechanisms of dispersed central-place foraging in polydomous colonies of the Argentine ant , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  Y. Nishiura,et al.  Obtaining multiple separate food sources: behavioural intelligence in the Physarum plasmodium , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  Andrew Adamatzky,et al.  Slime Mold Solves Maze in One Pass, Assisted by Gradient of Chemo-Attractants , 2011, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[26]  A. Reynolds,et al.  Chemotaxis can take plant-parasitic nematodes to the source of a chemo-attractant via the shortest possible routes , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[27]  D. Kessler,et al.  CHAPTER 5 – Plasmodial Structure and Motility , 1982 .

[28]  A. Tero,et al.  A mathematical model for adaptive transport network in path finding by true slime mold. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[29]  T. Ueda,et al.  Membrane biophysics of chemoreception and taxis in the plasmodium of Physarum polycephalum. , 1980, Biophysical chemistry.

[30]  Toshiyuki Nakagaki,et al.  Structure and formation of ant transportation networks , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[31]  A. Tero,et al.  Rules for Biologically Inspired Adaptive Network Design , 2010, Science.

[32]  W. Dove,et al.  Growth and differentiation in Physarum polycephalum , 1980 .