ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION

Discusses the notion that the ability to exploit external knowledge is crucial to a firm's innovative capabilities. In addition, it is argued that the ability to evaluate and use outside knowledge is largely a function of the level of prior related knowledge--i.e., absorptive capacity. Prior research has shown that firms that conduct their own research and development (R&D) are better able to use information from external sources. Therefore, it is possible that the absorptive capacity of a firm is created as a byproduct of the firm's R&D investment. A simple model of firm R&D intensity is constructed in a broader context of what applied economists call the three classes of industry-level determinants of R&D intensity: demand, appropriability, and technological opportunity conditions. Several predictions are made, including the notions that absorptive capacity does have a direct effect on R&D spending and spillovers will provide a positive incentive to conduct R&D. All hypotheses are tested using cross-sectional survey data on technological opportunity and appropriability conditions--collected over the period 1975 to 1977 for 1,719 business units--in the American manufacturing sector from Levin et al. (1983, 1987) and the Federal Trade Commission's Line of Business Program data on business unit sales, transfers, and R&D expenditures. Results confirm that firms are sensitive to the characteristics of the learning environment in which they operate and that absorptive capacity does appear to be a part of a firm's decisions regarding resource allocation for innovative activity. Results also suggest that, although the analysis showing a positive effect of spillovers in two industry groups do not represent a direct test of the model, positive absorption incentive associated with spillovers may be sufficiently strong in some cases to more than offset the negative appropribility incentive. (SFL)

[1]  J. Schumpeter Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[2]  E. Hilgard,et al.  Theories of Learning , 1981 .

[3]  H. Harlow,et al.  The formation of learning sets. , 1949, Psychological review.

[4]  H. Simon,et al.  Selective perception: A note on the departmental identifications of executives. , 1958 .

[5]  R. Nelson The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research , 1959, Journal of Political Economy.

[6]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[7]  Willard F. Mueller,et al.  The Origins of the Basic Inventions Underlying Du Pont's Major Product and Process Innovations, 1920 to 1950 , 1962 .

[8]  M. Peck,et al.  Inventions in the Postwar American Aluminum Industry , 1962 .

[9]  K. Arrow Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[10]  D. Hamberg,et al.  Invention in the Industrial Research Laboratory , 1963, Journal of Political Economy.

[11]  Henry C. Ellis,et al.  Transfer of Learning , 2021, Research in Mathematics Education.

[12]  W. Bennis,et al.  The Social Psychology of Organizations , 1966 .

[13]  Joel Mokyr,et al.  Economics of Technological Change , 1969 .

[14]  W. Estes Learning theory and mental development , 1970 .

[15]  J. Tilton International diffusion of technology : the case of semiconductors , 1971 .

[16]  J. Utterback The Process of Technological Innovation Within the Firm , 1971 .

[17]  Marilyn Bohl,et al.  Information processing , 1971 .

[18]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[19]  F. Glen The social psychology of organizations , 1976 .

[20]  R. Johnston,et al.  Characteristics of information usage in technological innovation , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[21]  O. Williamson Markets and Hierarchies , 1975 .

[22]  Raymond J. Bandlow Theories of Learning, 4th Edition. By Ernest R. Hilgard and Gordon H. Bower. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1975 , 1976 .

[23]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[24]  P. H. Lindsay Human Information Processing , 1977 .

[25]  T. Allen Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[26]  M. Tushman Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process. , 1977 .

[27]  E. Hippel Successful Industrial Products from Customer Ideas , 1978 .

[28]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Technical Communication in R & D Laboratories: The Impact of Project Work Characteristics , 1978 .

[29]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Successful Industrial Products from Customer Ideas: Presentation of a new customer-active paradigm with evidence and implications. , 1978 .

[30]  Badiul Alam Majumdar,et al.  Innovations, product developments, and technology transfers: An empirical study of dynamic competitive advantage, the case of electronic calculators , 1982 .

[31]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the black box , 1983 .

[32]  Denis M. S. Lee,et al.  Integrating New Technical Staff: Implications for Acquiring New Technology , 1982 .

[33]  R. Katz The Effects of Group Longevity on Project Communication and Performance. , 1982 .

[34]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[35]  R. Katz,et al.  Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups , 1982 .

[36]  D. Mowery The relationship between intrafirm and contractual forms of industrial research in American manufacturing, 1900-1940 , 1983 .

[37]  H. Simon,et al.  Studying Scientific Discovery by Computer Simulation , 1983, Science.

[38]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Learning to Program in LISP , 1984, Cogn. Sci..

[39]  M. Spence Cost Reduction, Competition and Industry Performance , 1984 .

[40]  P. Pirolli,et al.  The role of learning from examples in the acquisition of recursive programming skills. , 1985 .

[41]  Kiyonori Sakakibara,et al.  The role of Japan-based R&D in global technology strategy , 1985 .

[42]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[43]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[44]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[45]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial R&D , 1988 .

[46]  E. Mansfield The speed and cost of industrial innovation in Japan and the United States: external vs. internal technology , 1988 .

[47]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Why are Americans Such Poor Imitators , 1988 .

[48]  D. Mowery,et al.  Technology and the pursuit of economic growth , 1991 .

[49]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[50]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Empirical studies of innovation and market structure , 1989 .

[51]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Understanding the Adoption of Ada: A Field Study Report , 1989 .

[52]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Organizational Demography: The Differential Effects of Age and Tenure Distributions on Technical Communication , 1989 .

[53]  N. Rosenberg Why do firms do basic research (with their own money) , 1990 .

[54]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth , 1990 .

[55]  Thomas A. Russman SELECTIVE PERCEPTION , 2022 .