Recording single neurons' action potentials from freely moving pigeons across three stages of learning.

While the subject of learning has attracted immense interest from both behavioral and neural scientists, only relatively few investigators have observed single-neuron activity while animals are acquiring an operantly conditioned response, or when that response is extinguished. But even in these cases, observation periods usually encompass only a single stage of learning, i.e. acquisition or extinction, but not both (exceptions include protocols employing reversal learning; see Bingman et al.(1) for an example). However, acquisition and extinction entail different learning mechanisms and are therefore expected to be accompanied by different types and/or loci of neural plasticity. Accordingly, we developed a behavioral paradigm which institutes three stages of learning in a single behavioral session and which is well suited for the simultaneous recording of single neurons' action potentials. Animals are trained on a single-interval forced choice task which requires mapping each of two possible choice responses to the presentation of different novel visual stimuli (acquisition). After having reached a predefined performance criterion, one of the two choice responses is no longer reinforced (extinction). Following a certain decrement in performance level, correct responses are reinforced again (reacquisition). By using a new set of stimuli in every session, animals can undergo the acquisition-extinction-reacquisition process repeatedly. Because all three stages of learning occur in a single behavioral session, the paradigm is ideal for the simultaneous observation of the spiking output of multiple single neurons. We use pigeons as model systems, but the task can easily be adapted to any other species capable of conditioned discrimination learning.

[1]  B. Skinner 'Superstition' in the pigeon. 1948. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[2]  Frank Jäkel,et al.  Suboptimal criterion setting in a perceptual choice task with asymmetric reinforcement , 2013, Behavioural Processes.

[3]  Stephen Maren,et al.  Auditory fear conditioning increases CS‐elicited spike firing in lateral amygdala neurons even after extensive overtraining , 2000, The European journal of neuroscience.

[4]  Tobias Otto,et al.  The Biopsychology-Toolbox: A free, open-source Matlab-toolbox for the control of behavioral experiments , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[5]  O. Güntürkün,et al.  Adaptive criterion setting in perceptual decision making. , 2011, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[6]  M. Colombo,et al.  Responses of pigeon (Columba livia) Wulst neurons during acquisition and reversal of a visual discrimination task. , 2008, Behavioral neuroscience.

[7]  Ewelina Knapska,et al.  Differential involvement of the central amygdala in appetitive versus aversive learning. , 2006, Learning & memory.

[8]  Jennifer A. Hobin,et al.  Hippocampal regulation of context-dependent neuronal activity in the lateral amygdala. , 2007, Learning & memory.

[9]  Jennifer A. Hobin,et al.  Context-Dependent Neuronal Activity in the Lateral Amygdala Represents Fear Memories after Extinction , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  J. E. Mazur Varying initial-link and terminal-link durations in concurrent-chains schedules: a comparison of three models , 2004, Behavioural Processes.

[11]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Complex Visual Concept in the Pigeon , 1964, Science.

[12]  Differential endocannabinoid regulation of extinction in appetitive and aversive Barnes maze tasks. , 2008, Learning & memory.

[13]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Fear conditioning enhances short-latency auditory responses of lateral amygdala neurons: Parallel recordings in the freely behaving rat , 1995, Neuron.

[14]  B. McNaughton,et al.  Tetrodes markedly improve the reliability and yield of multiple single-unit isolation from multi-unit recordings in cat striate cortex , 1995, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[15]  David K Bilkey,et al.  A low cost, high precision subminiature microdrive for extracellular unit recording in behaving animals , 1999, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[16]  P. L. Brown,et al.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[17]  M S Lewicki,et al.  A review of methods for spike sorting: the detection and classification of neural action potentials. , 1998, Network.

[18]  Daniel N Hill,et al.  Quality Metrics to Accompany Spike Sorting of Extracellular Signals , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Fear Conditioning Enhances Different Temporal Components of Tone-Evoked Spike Trains in Auditory Cortex and Lateral Amygdala , 1997, Neuron.

[20]  Maik C. Stüttgen,et al.  Stimulus-Response-Outcome Coding in the Pigeon Nidopallium Caudolaterale , 2013, PloS one.

[21]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  ‘Insight’ in the pigeon: antecedents and determinants of an intelligent performance , 1984, Nature.

[22]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Time, rate, and conditioning. , 2000, Psychological review.

[23]  R J HERRNSTEIN,et al.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[24]  Bruce L. McNaughton,et al.  The stereotrode: A new technique for simultaneous isolation of several single units in the central nervous system from multiple unit records , 1983, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[25]  A. Lüthi,et al.  Switching on and off fear by distinct neuronal circuits , 2008, Nature.

[26]  G. Quirk,et al.  Neurons in medial prefrontal cortex signal memory for fear extinction , 2002, Nature.

[27]  Michael Colombo,et al.  A lightweight microdrive for single-unit recording in freely moving rats and pigeons. , 2003, Methods.