Measurement depth of the cosmic ray soil moisture probe affected by hydrogen from various sources

[1] We present here a simple and robust framework for quantifying the effective sensor depth of cosmic ray soil moisture neutron probes such that reliable water fluxes may be computed from a time series of cosmic ray soil moisture. In particular, we describe how the neutron signal depends on three near-surface hydrogen sources: surface water, soil moisture, and lattice water (water in minerals present in soil solids) and also their vertical variations. Through a combined modeling study of one-dimensional water flow in soil and neutron transport in the atmosphere and subsurface, we compare average water content between the simulated soil moisture profiles and the universal calibration equation which is used to estimate water content from neutron counts. By using a linear sensitivity weighting function, we find that during evaporation and drainage periods the RMSE of the two average water contents is 0.0070 m 3 m � 3 with a maximum deviation of 0.010 m 3 m � 3 for a range of soil types. During infiltration, the RMSE is 0.011 m 3 m � 3 with a maximum deviation of 0.020 m 3 m � 3 , where piston like flow conditions exists for the homogeneous isotropic media. Because piston flow is unlikely during natural conditions at the horizontal scale of hundreds of meters that is measured by the cosmic ray probe, this modeled deviation of 0.020 m 3 m � 3 represents the worst case scenario for cosmic ray sensing of soil moisture. Comparison of cosmic ray soil moisture data and a distributed sensor soil moisture network in Southern Arizona indicates an RMSE of 0.011 m 3 m � 3 over a

[1]  F. Day‐Lewis,et al.  Assessing the resolution‐dependent utility of tomograms for geostatistics , 2004 .

[2]  Venkat Lakshmi,et al.  Advancing process‐based watershed hydrological research using near‐surface geophysics: a vision for, and review of, electrical and magnetic geophysical methods , 2008 .

[3]  T. Ferré,et al.  Nature's neutron probe: Land surface hydrology at an elusive scale with cosmic rays , 2010 .

[4]  J. Bear Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media , 1975 .

[5]  J. D. Mcneill Electromagnetic Terrain Conduc-tivity Measurement at Low Induction Numbers , 1980 .

[6]  Raymond L. Murray,et al.  The Elements of Nuclear Reactor Theory , 1953 .

[7]  Andrew Binley,et al.  Applying petrophysical models to radar travel time and electrical resistivity tomograms: Resolution‐dependent limitations , 2005 .

[8]  R. W. Groom,et al.  Vertical Spatial Sensitivity and Exploration Depth of Low‐Induction‐Number Electromagnetic‐Induction Instruments , 2007 .

[9]  J. Philip,et al.  Hydrostatics and hydrodynamics in swelling soils , 1969 .

[10]  Keith Beven,et al.  Vadose Zone Flow Model Uncertainty as Conditioned on Geophysical Data , 2003, Ground water.

[11]  W. J. Shuttleworth,et al.  COSMOS: the COsmic-ray Soil Moisture Observing System , 2012 .

[12]  A. C. Hinnell,et al.  Improved extraction of hydrologic information from geophysical data through coupled hydrogeophysical inversion , 2010 .

[13]  A. Milbrandt Geographic Perspective on the Current Biomass Resource Availability in the United States , 2005 .

[14]  D. S. Chanasyk,et al.  Field measurement of soil moisture using neutron probes , 1996 .

[15]  A. P. Annan,et al.  Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines , 1980 .

[16]  R. Scott,et al.  Measuring soil moisture content non‐invasively at intermediate spatial scale using cosmic‐ray neutrons , 2008 .

[17]  M. Egan Elements of nuclear reactor fueling theory , 1984 .

[18]  Amilcare Porporato,et al.  Stochastic Dynamics of Plant-Water Interactions , 2007 .

[19]  M. Schaap,et al.  ROSETTA: a computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions , 2001 .

[20]  Jean L. Steiner,et al.  PRECISION OF NEUTRON SCATTERING AND CAPACITANCE TYPE SOIL WATER CONTENT GAUGES FROM FIELD CALIBRATION , 1995 .

[21]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Preferred states in spatial soil moisture patterns: Local and nonlocal controls , 1997 .

[22]  I. Cameron Elements of Nuclear Reactor Theory , 1982 .

[23]  R. Kachanoski,et al.  Spatial averaging of water content by time domain reflectometry : Implications for twin rod probes with and without dielectric coatings , 1996 .

[24]  Thomas J. Jackson,et al.  Passive microwave observation of diurnal surface soil moisture , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[25]  Commonwealth Scientific,et al.  Soil Water Assessment by the Neutron Method , 1981 .

[26]  L. D. Hendrick,et al.  COSMIC-RAY NEUTRONS NEAR THE EARTH , 1966 .

[27]  Miroslav Šejna,et al.  Development and Applications of the HYDRUS and STANMOD Software Packages and Related Codes , 2008 .

[28]  Arthur W. Warrick,et al.  A Sensitivity Analysis of Electrical Resistivity Tomography Array Types Using Analytical Element Modeling , 2003 .

[29]  E. C. Childs Dynamics of fluids in Porous Media , 1973 .

[30]  D. Hillel Environmental soil physics , 1998 .

[31]  W. R. Gardner,et al.  DETERMINATION OF SOIL MOISTURE BY NEUTRON SCATTERING , 1952 .