Dermoscopy-guided reflectance confocal microscopy of skin using high-NA objective lens with integrated wide-field color camera

Reflectance Confocal Microscopy, or RCM, is being increasingly used to guide diagnosis of skin lesions. The combination of widefield dermoscopy (WFD) with RCM is highly sensitive (~90%) and specific (~ 90%) for noninvasively detecting melanocytic and non-melanocytic skin lesions. The combined WFD and RCM approach is being implemented on patients to triage lesions into benign (with no biopsy) versus suspicious (followed by biopsy and pathology). Currently, however, WFD and RCM imaging are performed with separate instruments, while using an adhesive ring attached to the skin to sequentially image the same region and co-register the images. The latest small handheld RCM instruments offer no provision yet for a co-registered wide-field image. This paper describes an innovative solution that integrates an ultra-miniature dermoscopy camera into the RCM objective lens, providing simultaneous wide-field color images of the skin surface and RCM images of the subsurface cellular structure. The objective lens (0.9 NA) includes a hyperhemisphere lens and an ultra-miniature CMOS color camera, commanding a 4 mm wide dermoscopy view of the skin surface. The camera obscures the central portion of the aperture of the objective lens, but the resulting annular aperture provides excellent RCM optical sectioning and resolution. Preliminary testing on healthy volunteers showed the feasibility of combined WFD and RCM imaging to concurrently show the skin surface in wide-field and the underlying microscopic cellular-level detail. The paper describes this unique integrated dermoscopic WFD/RCM lens, and shows representative images. The potential for dermoscopy-guided RCM for skin cancer diagnosis is discussed.

[1]  B. Rao,et al.  The diagnostic accuracy of in vivo confocal microscopy in clinical practice. , 2015, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[2]  C. Longo,et al.  Reflectance confocal microscopy as a second‐level examination in skin oncology improves diagnostic accuracy and saves unnecessary excisions: a longitudinal prospective study , 2014, The British journal of dermatology.

[3]  R. Webb,et al.  In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy of human skin II: advances in instrumentation and comparison with histology. , 1999, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[4]  J. Malvehy,et al.  In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy of equivocal melanocytic lesions detected by digital dermoscopy follow‐up , 2015, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[5]  Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof,et al.  Reflectance confocal microscopy in the daily practice. , 2009, Seminars in cutaneous medicine and surgery.

[6]  S. González,et al.  The use of reflectance confocal microscopy for monitoring response to therapy of skin malignancies , 2012, Dermatology practical & conceptual.

[7]  R. Hofmann-Wellenhof,et al.  Impact of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy on the number needed to treat melanoma in doubtful lesions , 2014 .

[8]  D H Brooks,et al.  Video‐mosaicing of reflectance confocal images for examination of extended areas of skin in vivo , 2014, The British journal of dermatology.

[9]  S Yang,et al.  Modulation Transfer Function Measurement Using Three- and Four-bar Targets. , 1995, Applied optics.

[10]  G. Argenziano,et al.  Dermoscopic difficult lesions: an objective evaluation of reflectance confocal microscopy impact for accurate diagnosis , 2015, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[11]  R. Webb,et al.  Video-rate confocal scanning laser microscope for imaging human tissues in vivo. , 1999, Applied optics.

[12]  S. Menzies,et al.  Improving management and patient care in lentigo maligna by mapping with in vivo confocal microscopy. , 2013, JAMA dermatology.