Why do workers behave unsafely at work? Determinants of safe work practices in industrial workers

Aims: To explore the relation between safety climate (workers’ perceptions regarding management’s attitudes towards occupational safety and health) and workers’ behaviour at work. Methods: Cross sectional survey of workers at the pottery industry in Castellon, Spain. Sampling was stratified by plant size and workers’ gender, according to data on the working population at this setting. A total of 734 production workers were interviewed. Information was collected on safety climate and workers’ behaviour towards occupational risks with a specific questionnaire. A safety climate index (SCI, scale 0–100) was constructed adding scores for each item measuring safety climate in the questionnaire. Workers’ unsafe behaviour was analysed for the different safety climate index levels. Results: Mean score for SCI was 71.90 (SD 19.19). There were no differences in SCI scores according to age, gender, education, children at charge, seniority at work, or type of employment. Small workplaces (<50 workers) showed significantly worse SCI (mean 67.23, SD 19.73) than the largest factories (>200 workers). Lower levels of SCI (SCI <50) were related to workers’ unsafe behaviours (full/high accord with the statement “I excessively expose myself to hazards in my work”, adjusted odds ratio ORa 2.79, 95% CI 1.60 to 4.88), and to lack of compliance with safety rules (ORa 12.83, 95% CI 5.92 to 27.80). Conclusions: Safety climate measures workers’ perception of organisational factors related to occupational health and safety (for example, management commitment to risk prevention or priorities of safety versus production). In this study these factors are strongly associated with workers’ attitudes towards safety at work. Longitudinal studies can further clarify the relation between safety climate and workers’ behaviour regarding occupational safety and health.

[1]  Tx Station Stata Statistical Software: Release 7. , 2001 .

[2]  U Varonen,et al.  The safety climate and its relationship to safety practices, safety of the work environment and occupational accidents in eight wood-processing companies. , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  L R Murphy,et al.  Hospital safety climate and its relationship with safe work practices and workplace exposure incidents. , 2000, American journal of infection control.

[4]  L Kochevar,et al.  Testing the reliability and validity of a measure of safety climate. , 2000, Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality.

[5]  Torbjørn Rundmo,et al.  Safety climate, attitudes and risk perception in Norsk Hydro , 2000 .

[6]  A. Griffiths Organizational interventions: facing the limits of the natural science paradigm. , 1999, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[7]  Rosa Isla Díaz,et al.  Safety climate and attitude as evaluation measures of organizational safety. , 1997 .

[8]  R Isla Díaz,et al.  Safety climate and attitude as evaluation measures of organizational safety. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  H S Shannon,et al.  Workplace organizational correlates of lost-time accident rates in manufacturing. , 1996, American journal of industrial medicine.

[10]  M K Lindell,et al.  Motivational and organizational factors affecting implementation of worker safety training. , 1994, Occupational medicine.

[11]  Tomás Rodrigo López Arias Ley de prevención de riesgos laborales , 1994 .

[12]  R L Brown,et al.  The use of a factor-analytic procedure for assessing the validity of an employee safety climate model. , 1986, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  D. Zohar Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. , 1980, The Journal of applied psychology.