Estimation of genetic parameters for ultrasound-predicted percentage of intramuscular fat in Angus cattle using random regression models.

The present study included 3,358 observations of 675 bulls and heifers from the Iowa State University beef cattle breeding project. Data were collected over a 3-yr period between 1998 and 2000. Each year, cattle were scanned four to six times for ultrasound-predicted percentage of intramuscular fat (UPFAT) and other ultrasound traits, starting at a minimum age of 28 wk. The objective of the current study was to estimate variance components, heritability, and repeatability of UPFAT in young bulls and heifers. Data were subjected to random-regression animal models that included fixed effects of contemporary group, fixed Legendre polynomial of age at measurement, and random regression coefficients on Legendre polynomial of age at measurement for animals' direct genetic and direct permanent environmental effects. Phenotypic and genetic models involving different levels of polynomial fit for the animal component were considered. A model fitting a linear effect of Legendre polynomial of age at a measurement for animal direct genetic and direct permanent environmental effects and a homogeneous error variance described the present data adequately. Heritability of UPFAT ranged from 0.32 at 28 wk of age to a maximum of 0.53 at 63 wk. Repeatability of UPFAT increased from a minimum of 0.60 at ages of 28 to 39 wk to a maximum of 0.80 at ages 61 to 63 wk. Heritability and repeatability of yearling UPFAT were 0.50 and 0.71, respectively. With the exception of minor differences at earlier ages, fitting heterogeneous error variances did not have an effect on genetic parameter estimates for most ages of measurement. The present results showed an optimal heritability and repeatability of UPFAT measures around 52 wk and through at least 63 wk of age. This suggested that differences in UPFAT measures during this period also are good measures of differences in marbling genetic potential of Angus cattle.

[1]  R. Veerkamp,et al.  Genetic parameters for various random regression models to describe the weight data of pigs. , 2002, Journal of animal science.

[2]  Karin Meyer,et al.  Random regressions to model phenotypic variation in monthly weights of Australian beef cows , 2000 .

[3]  William G. Hill,et al.  ESTIMATING VARIANCE COMPONENTS FOR TEST DAY MILK RECORDS BY RESTRICTED MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD WITH A RANDOM REGRESSION ANIMAL MODEL , 1999 .

[4]  K. Meyer.  Estimates of genetic and phenotypic covariance functions for postweaning growth and mature weight of beef cows , 1999 .

[5]  V. Amin,et al.  Repeatability of ultrasound-predicted percentage of intramuscular fat in feedlot cattle. , 1999, Journal of animal science.

[6]  K. Meyer.  Estimating covariance functions for longitudinal data using a random regression model , 1998, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[7]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Estimation of genetic and phenotypic covariance functions for longitudinal or ‘repeated’ records by restricted maximum likelihood , 1997 .

[8]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Estimating the covariance structure of traits during growth and ageing, illustrated with lactation in dairy cattle. , 1994, Genetical research.

[9]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Analysis of the inheritance, selection and evolution of growth trajectories. , 1990, Genetics.

[10]  Clifford M. Hurvich,et al.  Regression and time series model selection in small samples , 1989 .

[11]  V. Amin,et al.  Predicting percentage of intramuscular fat using two types of real-time ultrasound equipment. , 2001, Journal of Animal Science.

[12]  M. Mercedes,et al.  The use of real-time-ultrasound to predict genetic attributes of body composition traits in live beef cattle , 1996 .

[13]  Kislaya Prasad,et al.  A comparison of model selection criteria , 1992 .