Store Design: Visual Complexity and Consumer Responses

Modern shopping spaces are full of sensory stimuli. Retailers, challenged by efficient online operators, tend to eagerly fill their stores with fixtures, furniture, decoration, displays, and product stock to provide experiential value to shoppers. Retailer efforts to attract consumers’ attention and maximize in-store experience can result in the exposure of consumers to a highly complex store environment, specifically from the visual perspective. Intangible stimuli, such as music and fragrance, are also routinely employed in stores, which may contribute to the increased sensory complexity. As visual sensation is the most dominant factor for people in perceiving and understanding the external environment, and marketing efforts heavily depend on visual communication, it is unsurprising that previous studies have emphasized the effects of visual complexity in understanding shoppers’ responses to grocery or deli store environments (Gilboa & Rafaeli, 2003; Nasar, 1987; Orth & Crouch, 2014; Orth & Wirtz, 2014; Orth, Wirtz, & McKinney, 2016). A store environment has both conscious and unconscious effects on consumers’ emotions. Environment can influence shopping behaviors including purchase intention (Donovan & Rossiter, 1982; Spence, Puccinelli, Grewal, & Roggeveen, 2014; Turley & Milliman, 2000), money or time spent in the store (Baker, Levy, & Grewal, 1992; Sherman, Mathur, & Smith, 1997), approach tendency (Bitner, 1992; Donovan, Rossiter, Marcoolyn, & Nesdale, 1994; Foxall & Greenley, 1999), and patronage (Wu et al., 2013). The store environment has a considerable effect on unplanned purchases by stimulating consumers’ cognitive and emotional status through product display or sensory stimuli (Chang, Eckman, & Yan, 2011; Inman, Winer, & Ferraro, 2009; Iyer, 1989; Piron, 1991; Silvera, Lavack, & Kropp, 2008). Creating an appealing store environment is an essential job for retail designers and managers, as it allows a unique and easy to recognize store image for consumers in highly competitive market conditions (Baker, Grewal, & Parasuraman 1994; Orth, Heinrich, & Malkewitz, 2012); it also positively affects consumer satisfaction and loyalty by boosting the store’s attractiveness and aesthetic value (Baker, Parasuraman, Grewal, & Voss, 2002; Vieira, 2010). The visual complexity of a store environment draws the attention of consumers and affects their emotional and behavioral response (Gilboa & Rafaeli, 2003; Orth & Wirtz, 2014; Orth et ORIGINAL ARTICLE

[1]  William R. Darden,et al.  Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value , 1994 .

[2]  D. Tigert,et al.  Fashion Involvement: a Cross-Cultural Comparative Analysis , 1980 .

[3]  Ulrich R. Orth,et al.  Advancing the aesthetic middle principle: Trade-offs in design attractiveness and strength , 2014 .

[4]  F. Piron Defining Impulse Purchasing , 1991 .

[5]  R. Goldsmith,et al.  The heavy user of clothing: Theoretical and empirical perspectives , 1999 .

[6]  Rosellina Ferraro,et al.  The Interplay among Category Characteristics, Customer Characteristics, and Customer Activities on in-Store Decision Making , 2009 .

[7]  Eric Shih,et al.  How banner ads can be effective , 2013 .

[8]  Iman Naderi Beyond the fad: a critical review of consumer fashion involvement , 2013 .

[9]  M. E. Gordon,et al.  Relationship marketing effectiveness: The role of involvement , 1998 .

[10]  Andrea Groeppel-Klein,et al.  The Role of Customers= Arousal For Retail Store - Results From an Experimental Pilot Study Using Electrodermal Activity As Indicator , 2001 .

[11]  D. Berlyne,et al.  Aesthetics and psychobiology , 1975 .

[12]  J. C. Andrews,et al.  A Framework for Conceptualizing and Measuring the Involvement Construct in Advertising Research , 1990 .

[13]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Living with complexity , 2011 .

[14]  J. Rossiter,et al.  Store atmosphere: an environmental psychology approach , 1982 .

[15]  Valter Afonso Vieira,et al.  Visual aesthetics in store environment and its moderating role on consumer intention , 2010 .

[16]  P. Sullivan,et al.  Fashion involvement and experiential value: Gen Y retail apparel patronage , 2012 .

[17]  M. Bradley,et al.  Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential. , 1994, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry.

[18]  T. Meyvis,et al.  Effects of Brand Logo Complexity, Repetition, and Spacing on Processing Fluency and Judgment , 2001 .

[19]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and Employees: , 1992 .

[20]  Jochen Wirtz,et al.  Congruency of Scent and Music As a Driver of In-Store Evaluations and Behavior , 2001 .

[21]  A. O'Cass An assessment of consumers product, purchase decision, advertising and consumption involvement in fashion clothing , 2000 .

[22]  R. Yan,et al.  Application of the Stimulus-Organism-Response model to the retail environment: the role of hedonic motivation in impulse buying behavior , 2011 .

[23]  Jieun Kim,et al.  Fashion product display , 2013 .

[24]  Jochen Wirtz,et al.  Consumer Processing of Interior Service Environments , 2014 .

[25]  Paul D. Bolls,et al.  The Effects of Message Valence and Listener Arousal on Attention, Memory, and Facial Muscular Responses to Radio Advertisements , 2001, Commun. Res..

[26]  B. Kahn,et al.  Variety for sale: Mass customization or mass confusion? , 1998 .

[27]  Samuel D. Bradley,et al.  Psychophysiological Responses to Background Brand Placements in Video Games , 2013 .

[28]  Dena S Cox,et al.  Beyond first impressions: The effects of repeated exposure on consumer liking of visually complex and simple product designs , 2002 .

[29]  R. Goldsmith,et al.  Social values and female fashion leadership: A cross‐cultural study , 1993 .

[30]  Ulrich R. Orth,et al.  Is Beauty in the Aisles of the Retailer? Package Processing in Visually Complex Contexts , 2014 .

[31]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment , 2003 .

[32]  J. Chébat,et al.  Impact of ambient odors on mall shoppers' emotions, cognition, and spending: A test of competitive causal theories , 2003 .

[33]  Hsiu Feng Wang,et al.  Picture perfect: Girls' and boys' preferences towards visual complexity in children's websites , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  R. Donovan Store atmosphere and purchasing behavior , 1994 .

[35]  Paul W. Ballantine,et al.  Atmospheric cues and their effect on the hedonic retail experience , 2010 .

[36]  M. Bradley,et al.  Looking at pictures: affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[37]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  The influence of store environment on quality inferences and store image , 1994 .

[38]  Susan Powell Mantel,et al.  Perceived Retail Crowding and Shopping Satisfaction: What Modifies This Relationship? , 2000 .

[39]  Marcos Nadal,et al.  Visual Complexity and Beauty Appreciation: Explaining the Divergence of Results , 2010 .

[40]  Barbara Seegebarth,et al.  The Impact of Perceived Visual Complexity of Mobile Online Shops on User's Satisfaction , 2017 .

[41]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[42]  R Eisenman,et al.  Pleasing and Interesting Visual Complexity: Support for Berlyne , 1966, Perceptual and motor skills.

[43]  E. Vogel,et al.  Human Variation in Overriding Attentional Capture , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  D. Silvera,et al.  Impulse buying: the role of affect, social influence, and subjective wellbeing , 2008 .

[45]  Glenn B. Voss,et al.  The Influence of Multiple Store Environment Cues on Perceived Merchandise Value and Patronage Intentions , 2002 .

[46]  A. Hayes Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[47]  Shaked Gilboa,et al.  Store environment, emotions and approach behaviour: applying environmental aesthetics to retailing , 2003 .

[48]  Philip A. Titus,et al.  The consumer retail search process: A conceptual model and research agenda , 1995 .

[49]  J. Nasar The Effect of Sign Complexity and Coherence on the Perceived Quality of Retail Scenes , 1987 .

[50]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[51]  Charles Spence,et al.  Store Atmospherics: A Multisensory Perspective , 2014 .

[52]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  The Variety of an Assortment , 1999 .

[53]  William R. Darden,et al.  Consumer self-regulation in a retail environment☆☆☆ , 1995 .

[54]  Ulrich R. Orth,et al.  Servicescape interior design and consumers' personality impressions , 2012 .

[55]  Jochen Wirtz,et al.  Shopping experiences in visually complex environments: a self-regulation account , 2016 .

[56]  M. Zuckerman Behavioral Expressions and Biosocial Bases of Sensation Seeking , 1994 .

[57]  Robert F. Potter,et al.  Psychophysiological Measurement and Meaning: Cognitive and Emotional Processing of Media , 2011 .

[58]  T. Oum,et al.  Determinant Attributes in Retail Patronage: Seasonal, Temporal, Regional, and International Comparisons , 1983 .

[59]  Michel Wedel,et al.  The Stopping Power of Advertising: Measures and Effects of Visual Complexity , 2010 .

[60]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Electromyographic activity over facial muscle regions can differentiate the valence and intensity of affective reactions. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[61]  Regan L. Mandryk,et al.  Using psychophysiological techniques to measure user experience with entertainment technologies , 2006, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[62]  William R. Swinyard,et al.  The Effects of Mood, Involvement, and Quality of Store Experience on Shopping Intentions , 1993 .

[63]  A. O'Cass Fashion clothing consumption: antecedents and consequences of fashion clothing involvement , 2004 .

[64]  C. Cela-Conde,et al.  Predicting beauty: fractal dimension and visual complexity in art. , 2011, British journal of psychology.

[65]  J. Nasar New Developments in Aesthetics for Urban Design , 1997 .

[66]  Barbara E. Kahn,et al.  Perceptions of assortment variety: The effects of congruency between consumers’ internal and retailers’ external organization , 2005 .

[67]  Alexandre N. Tuch,et al.  Visual complexity of websites: Effects on users' experience, physiology, performance, and memory , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[68]  The effect of consumers' involvement and innovativeness on the utilization of fashion wardrobe , 2014 .

[69]  R. Meyer,et al.  Biases in Predicting Preferences for the Whole Visual Patterns from Product Fragments , 2007 .

[70]  R. Watson,et al.  The Influence of Home Page Complexity on Consumer Attention, Attitudes, and Purchase Intent , 2006 .

[71]  Richard L. Celsi,et al.  The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension Processes , 1988 .

[72]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Aesthetic design of e-commerce web pages - Webpage Complexity, Order and preference , 2012, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[73]  Marvin J. Dainoff,et al.  Advertisement Complexity and Looking Time , 1972 .

[74]  Gordon R. Foxall,et al.  Consumers' Emotional Responses to Service Environments , 1999 .

[75]  Claus Ebster,et al.  Store Design and Visual Merchandising: Creating Store Space That Encourages Buying , 2011 .

[76]  J. Russell,et al.  An approach to environmental psychology , 1974 .

[77]  G. Alpers,et al.  Automatic behavioural responses to valence: Evidence that facial action is facilitated by evaluative processing , 2005 .

[78]  E. Hirschman,et al.  Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions , 1982 .

[79]  Daniel L. Sherrell,et al.  Consumer Search: An Extended Framework , 1986 .

[80]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[81]  B. Kahn,et al.  Cross-category effects of induced arousal and pleasure on the Internet shopping experience , 2002 .

[82]  R. E. Milliman,et al.  Atmospheric Effects on Shopping Behavior: A Review of the Experimental Evidence , 2000 .

[83]  P. Vitz Preference for different amounts of visual complexity. , 1966, Behavioral science.

[84]  Niklas Ravaja,et al.  Purchase Behavior and Psychophysiological Responses to Different Price Levels , 2013 .

[85]  A. Mathur,et al.  Store environment and consumer purchase behavior: Mediating role of consumer emotions , 1997 .

[86]  Richard L. Hazlett,et al.  Emotional response to television commercials: Facial EMG vs. self-report , 1999 .

[87]  Jan P.L. Schoormans,et al.  Product value importance and consumer preference for visual complexity and symmetry , 2010 .