Effect of train type on annoyance and acoustic features of the rolling noise.

This study investigated the annoyance associated with the rolling noise of different railway stock. Passbys of nine train types (passenger and freight trains) equipped with different braking systems were recorded. Acoustic features showed a clear distinction of the braking system with the A-weighted energy equivalent sound level (LAeq) showing a difference in the range of 10 dB between cast-iron braked trains and trains with disk or K-block brakes. Further, annoyance was evaluated in a psychoacoustic experiment where listeners rated the relative annoyance of the rolling noise for the different train types. Stimuli with and without the original LAeq differences were tested. For the original LAeq differences, the braking system significantly affected the annoyance with cast-iron brakes being most annoying, most likely as a consequence of the increased wheel roughness causing an increased LAeq. Contribution of the acoustic features to the annoyance was investigated revealing that the LAeq explained up to 94% of the variance. For the stimuli without differences in the LAeq, cast-iron braked train types were significantly less annoying and the spectral features explained up to 60% of the variance in the annoyance. The effect of these spectral features on the annoyance of the rolling noise is discussed.

[1]  M. G. Dittrich,et al.  ROUGHNESS ON DUTCH RAILWAY WHEELS AND RAILS , 1996 .

[2]  J. M. Fields,et al.  THE RESPONSE TO RAILWAY NOISE IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS IN GREAT BRITAIN , 1982 .

[3]  G. Schwarz.  Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[4]  James W. Beauchamp,et al.  Synthesis by Spectral Amplitude and "Brightness" Matching of Analyzed Musical Instrument Tones , 1981 .

[5]  M. Basner,et al.  Annoyance and self-reported sleep disturbance due to night-time railway noise examined in the field. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  David Thompson.  Introduction to Rolling Noise , 2010 .

[7]  Sandford Fidell.  Noise‐Induced Annoyance , 2008 .

[8]  F. G. de Beer,et al.  Experimental determination of pass-by noise contributions from the bogies and superstructure of a freight wagon , 2000 .

[9]  H. Keselman.  Testing treatment effects in repeated measures designs: an update for psychophysiological researchers. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[10]  S A Stansfeld,et al.  Annoyance and other reaction measures to changes in noise exposure - a review. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[11]  Juliet Popper Shaffer,et al.  Multiple pairwise comparisons of repeated measures means under violation of multisample sphericity , 1991 .

[12]  J. W. Gordon,et al.  Perceptual effects of spectral modifications on musical timbres , 1978 .

[13]  Ilona Berkovits,et al.  Bootstrap Resampling Approaches for Repeated Measure Designs: Relative Robustness to Sphericity and Normality Violations , 2000 .

[14]  J. Vos.  Annoyance caused by the sounds of a magnetic levitation train. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Anders Johansson,et al.  Out-of-round railway wheels—assessment of wheel tread irregularities in train traffic , 2006 .

[16]  Soogab Lee,et al.  Noise-induced annoyance from transportation noise: short-term responses to a single noise source in a laboratory. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  David Thompson,et al.  Identification, modelling and reduction potential of railway noise sources: a critical survey , 2003 .

[18]  B. Hemsworth.  Recent developments in wheel/rail noise research , 1979 .

[19]  J.C.O. Nielsen,et al.  Multi-disciplinary optimization of railway wheels , 2004 .

[20]  David Thompson.  ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WHEEL AND RAIL SURFACE ROUGHNESS AND ROLLING NOISE , 1996 .

[21]  David Thompson,et al.  The effects of transverse profile on the excitation of wheel/rail noise , 2000 .

[22]  H.M.E. Miedema,et al.  Is freight traffic noise more annoying than passenger traffic noise , 1996 .