Maintenance strategy selection with risky evaluations using RAHP

In recent years, maintenance, especially its preventive type, has been seen as an effective and considerable factor in improving the functions of machines. Maintenance plays a vital role in organizations by keeping and increasing the reliability, accessibility, the quality of products, risk mitigation, return improvement, and safety. An effective maintenance programme can be realized by implementing a proper maintenance strategy. Therefore, maintenance and its strategies have a special status in industries. However, selecting a proper maintenance strategy has always been a complex process because maintenance is a nonrepetitive task. Likewise, the lack of failure records and constant changes in the conditions of machines makes it further complicated. Hence, the decision-making also depends on experts' opinions and because some kind of risk and uncertainty are always there in experts evaluations, the reliability of evaluations is questionable. The present study was aimed to develop a risk-based model grounded on the analytical hierarchical process, namely, RAHP, to meet this need of maintenance. A case study from a steel rolling company was considered to evaluate the effectiveness of this model.

[1]  Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam,et al.  Risk-based reliability assessment under epistemic uncertainty , 2012 .

[2]  M. Ilangkumaran,et al.  Selection of optimum maintenance strategy based on FAHP integrated with GRA–TOPSIS , 2016, Ann. Oper. Res..

[3]  Ali Azadeh,et al.  Z-AHP: A Z-number extension of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process , 2013, 2013 7th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (DEST).

[4]  Shahrul Kamaruddin,et al.  Assessment of distance-based multi-attribute group decision-making methods from a maintenance strategy perspective , 2015 .

[5]  María Carmen Carnero Selection of diagnostic techniques and instrumentation in a predictive maintenance program. A case study , 2005 .

[6]  Bernard W. Ikua,et al.  Maintenance Strategy Selection using Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2016 .

[7]  Ashraf Labib,et al.  An effective maintenance system using the analytic hierarchy process , 1998 .

[8]  Sergio Cavalieri,et al.  Maintenance strategy selection: a comparison between fuzzy logic and analytic hierarchy process , 2008 .

[9]  Hui Xu,et al.  Transformer Maintenance Policies Selection Based on an Improved Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2013, J. Comput..

[10]  Basim Al-Najjar,et al.  An Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Sensitivity Analysis for Maintenance Policy Selection , 2014 .

[11]  Rob J. I. Basten,et al.  Exploring maintenance policy selection using the Analytic Hierarchy Process; An application for naval ships , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[12]  G. Crawford,et al.  A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices , 1985 .

[13]  D. Chang Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP , 1996 .

[14]  M. Ilangkumaran,et al.  Selection of maintenance policy for textile industry using hybrid multi‐criteria decision making approach , 2009 .

[15]  V. R. Pramod,et al.  Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and its application in analyzing factors inhibiting implementation of Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) , 2015 .

[16]  Selim Zaim,et al.  Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and ANP algorithms: a case study , 2012 .

[17]  Marcello Braglia,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process applied to maintenance strategy selection , 2000, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  Maurizio Bevilacqua,et al.  A combined goal programming - AHP approach to maintenance selection problem , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[19]  P. B. Ahamed Mohideen,et al.  Strategic approach to breakdown maintenance on construction plant – UAE perspective , 2014 .

[20]  Heping Li,et al.  A condition-based maintenance policy for multi-component systems with Lévy copulas dependence , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[21]  N. S. Arunraj,et al.  Risk-based maintenance policy selection using AHP and goal programming. , 2010 .

[22]  Mehmet Bayram Yildirim,et al.  A sustainability approach for selecting maintenance strategy , 2013 .

[23]  M. Ilangkumaran,et al.  Multi‐criteria decision‐making approach to evaluate optimum maintenance strategy in textile industry , 2008 .

[24]  Solomon Tesfamariam,et al.  Environmental decision-making under uncertainty using intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (IF-AHP) , 2009 .

[25]  Armando Calabrese,et al.  Using Fuzzy AHP to manage Intellectual Capital assets: An application to the ICT service industry , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  Ali Azadeh,et al.  An integrated fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy multiple-criteria decision-making simulation approach for maintenance policy selection , 2016, Simul..

[27]  Hacer Güner Gören,et al.  A new multi criteria decision making approach for medical imaging systems considering risk factors , 2015, Appl. Soft Comput..

[28]  Jianfeng Li,et al.  An evaluation of maintenance strategy using risk based inspection , 2011 .

[29]  E. Reissner On asymptotic solutions for nonsymmetric deformations of shallow shells of revolution , 1964 .

[30]  Zied Elouedi,et al.  Qualitative AHP models under the belief function framework , 2015, 2015 15th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA).

[31]  Ashkan Hafezalkotob,et al.  Risk-based material selection process supported on information theory: A case study on industrial gas turbine , 2017, Appl. Soft Comput..

[32]  Hwasoo Yeo,et al.  A comparative study of time-based maintenance and condition-based maintenance for optimal choice of maintenance policy , 2016 .

[33]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and COPRAS under fuzzy environment , 2012 .

[34]  Jun Wu,et al.  Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process , 2007 .

[35]  Sergio Cavalieri,et al.  An analytic hierarchy process based model for the selection of decision categories in maintenance systems , 2013 .

[36]  Zhongsheng Hua,et al.  On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[37]  Emel Kizilkaya Aydogan,et al.  Performance measurement model for Turkish aviation firms using the rough-AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[38]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with interval type-2 fuzzy sets , 2014, Knowl. Based Syst..

[39]  Fiona A. C. Polack,et al.  Dynamic optimisation of preventative and corrective maintenance schedules for a large scale urban drainage system , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[40]  Qing-wei Cao,et al.  Research on AHP with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application in multi-criteria decision making problems , 2013 .