The results of three independent studies involving 90 subjects, and using similar procedures and blind exposures have shown that increasing air quality (by decreasing the pollution load or by increasing the ventilation rate, with otherwise constant indoor climate conditions) can improve the performance of simulated office work (text typing, addition and proof-reading). An analysis of the combined data from these studies is presented to establish the relationship between air quality and performance in offices. It confirms that good air quality improves the performance of text typing (P=0.0002), and a similar tendency is seen for addition (P=0.056) and proof-reading (P=0.087). A positive correlation between the air quality, as it is perceived by occupants, and the performance of typing (R 2 =0.82, P=0.005), addition (R 2 =0.52, P=0.07) and proof-reading (R 2 =0.70, P=0.08) indicates that performance will increase on average by 1.5% when the proportion dissatisfied with the air quality is decreased by 10% in the range of air quality levels causing 25-70% to be dissatisfied. The results imply that doubling the outdoor air supply rate at constant pollution load, or a two-fold decrease of pollution load at constant ventilation rate, can increase overall performance by 1.9%. The present results document the economic benefits of providing good indoor air quality and indicate that providing indoor air of a higher quality than the minimum prescribed by the present ventilation standards will increase productivity.
[1]
J Pejtersen,et al.
Effect of renovating an office building on occupants' comfort and health.
,
2001,
Indoor air.
[2]
水谷 国男.
欧州の換気規格(案) CEN TC 156/WG6"Ventilation for Buildings : Design Criteria for the Indoor Environment"
,
1998
.
[3]
P. Fanger.
Introduction of the olf and the decipol units to quantify air pollution perceived by humans indoors and outdoors
,
1988
.
[4]
P Wargocki,et al.
Perceived air quality, sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms and productivity in an office with two different pollution loads.
,
1999,
Indoor air.
[5]
P. Fanger,et al.
The effects of outdoor air supply rate in an office on perceived air quality, sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms and productivity.
,
2000,
Indoor air.
[6]
D. Wyon.
Indoor environmental effects on productivity
,
1997
.
[7]
P. Fanger,et al.
ADAPTATION TO INDOOR AIR POLLUTION
,
1992
.