Using Head-Mounted Displays to Examine Adaptation and Calibration under Varying Perturbations

Abstract Simulator sickness has been a pervasive problem as head-mounted displays (HMDs) grow in popularity. Recent work showed that people can adapt to constant latency in an HMD, but latency that varies has not been examined. In this study, participants performed a shooting task while wearing an HMD during three sessions separated by 48 hours under conditions of constant or varying latency. Performance was assessed for both accuracy (targets hit) and speed (time-to-hit targets). It was hypothesized that participants would adapt to constant, but not varying latency as indicated by decreasing simulator sickness over time. Further, it was hypothesized that participants would improve performance over time for both conditions due to practice, but the constant latency group would improve at a faster rate. Results showed reduced sickness with session regardless of latency condition. A similar trend was shown where performance improved with each session, with no effect of the latency condition. Change in sickness and performance were not correlated, suggesting that the changes were independently driven. These findings showed that people reduced sickness and improved performance with repeated exposure, even when experiencing different perturbations. This finding has implications for both HMDs and general understanding of the relationship between latency and adaptation.

[1]  Yujie Dong,et al.  Measuring Digital System Latency from Sensing to Actuation at Continuous 1-ms Resolution , 2013, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[2]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Statistics Notes: Transforming data , 1996 .

[3]  Michael H Cole,et al.  A systematic review on perceptual-motor calibration to changes in action capabilities. , 2017, Human movement science.

[4]  Gary E. Riccio,et al.  Visually Induced Motion Sickness in Virtual Environments , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[5]  Prevention of motion sickness in flight maneuvers, aided by transfer of adaptation effects acquired in the laboratory: ten consecutive referrals. , 1978, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[6]  Warren Robinett Dimensions of synthetic experience , 1992 .

[7]  Stephen A. Palmisano,et al.  Multisensory integration and the experience of scene instability, presence and cybersickness in virtual environments , 2020, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  R. Held,et al.  Adaptation to displaced and delayed visual feedback from the hand. , 1966 .

[9]  Massimiliano Di Luca New Method to Measure End-to-End Delay of Virtual Reality , 2010, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[10]  Eric R. Muth,et al.  Task performance in a head-mounted display: The impacts of varying latency , 2020, Displays.

[11]  P. Howarth,et al.  Habituation to the Side Effects of Immersion in a Virtual Environment , 2000 .

[12]  Geoffrey P Bingham,et al.  Calibrating reach distance to visual targets. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  J. Golding Motion sickness susceptibility , 2006, Autonomic Neuroscience.

[14]  J. O'hanlon,et al.  Motion sickness incidence as a function of the frequency and acceleration of vertical sinusoidal motion. , 1973, Aerospace medicine.

[15]  R. Stern,et al.  Adaptation to vection-induced symptoms of motion sickness. , 1989, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[16]  R. Welch Perceptual modification : adapting to altered sensory environments / Robert B. Welch , 1978 .

[17]  Kay M. Stanney,et al.  Configural Scoring of Simulator Sickness, Cybersickness and Space Adaptation Syndrome: Similarities and Differences? , 2001 .

[18]  Adam W. Hoover,et al.  The effects of 0.2 Hz varying latency with 20-100 ms varying amplitude on simulator sickness in a helmet mounted display , 2015, Displays.

[19]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Quantification of adaptation to virtual-eye location in see-thru head-mounted displays , 1995, Proceedings Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium '95.

[20]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Virtual Eyes Can Rearrange Your Body: Adaptation to Visual Displacement in See-Through, Head-Mounted Displays , 1998, Presence.

[21]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Will Simulation Sickness Slow Down the Diffusion of Virtual Environment Technology? , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[22]  Stephen Palmisano,et al.  Method for estimating display lag in the Oculus Rift S and CV1 , 2019, SIGGRAPH Asia Posters.

[23]  Peter A. Howarth,et al.  Characteristics of habituation to motion in a virtual environment , 2008, Displays.

[24]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. , 1993 .

[25]  E. C. Regan Some evidence of adaptation to immersion in virtual reality , 1995 .

[26]  S Hu,et al.  Adaptation to Optokinetic Rotation-Induced Motion Sickness without Experiencing Nausea , 1997, Perceptual and motor skills.

[27]  Adam W. Hoover,et al.  Frequency, Not Amplitude, of Latency Affects Subjective Sickness in a Head-Mounted Display. , 2016, Aerospace medicine and human performance.

[28]  Sabarish V. Babu,et al.  Examining the Effects of Altered Avatars on Perception-Action in Virtual Reality , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[29]  Robert Welch,et al.  Adapting to Telesystems , 2003 .

[30]  Rupert England,et al.  Simulated and virtual realities: elements of perception , 1995 .