Wind and temperature effects on thermosphere mass density response to the November 2004 geomagnetic storm

[1] A unique conjunction of the Thermosphere Ionosphere Mesosphere Energetics and Dynamics (TIMED) and the Challenging Minisatellite Payload (CHAMP) satellites provided simultaneous columnar neutral composition, ΣO/N2, and thermosphere density observations, enabling a novel study of thermospheric response to the 7–9 November 2004 geomagnetic storm. Both ΣO/N2 and mass density showed profound response to this severe geomagnetic storm, but their latitudinal and temporal structures differed markedly. In particular, high-latitude depletion and low-latitude enhancement in ΣO/N2 were observed throughout the storm period, especially during the main phase. In contrast, neutral density at 400 km altitude increased from pole to pole shortly after the storm, with strongest enhancement of order 200%–400% during the main phase. Comparisons of observed thermosphere response with simulations from the National Center for Atmospheric Research Thermosphere-Ionosphere-Electrodynamics General Circulation Model (TIEGCM) were carried out to interpret the observed contrasting characteristics of thermosphere composition and mass density in response to this geomagnetic storm. The TIEGCM simulations show that the contrasting characteristics occur not only in ΣO/N2 and mass density at a constant altitude at 400 km, but also in O/N2 and mass density on a constant-pressure surface. At an altitude of 400 km (CHAMP altitude), storm-time mass densities significantly increase due to an increase in scale height throughout the vertical column between the heat source and satellite altitude. For a given increase in scale height, the more scale height increments separating the heat source from the satellite altitude, the greater is the mass density response. It is shown that scale height change is caused partly by storm-time neutral temperature enhancements due to heating and partly by changes in mean molecular weight due to winds. These findings indicate that wind effects can cause significant deviations from a mass density pattern resulting solely from neutral temperature changes by altering the mean molecular weight, particularly at high latitudes.

[1]  J. Forbes,et al.  Reversed ionospheric convections during the November 2004 storm: Impact on the upper atmosphere , 2009 .

[2]  Jeffrey M. Forbes,et al.  Rapid response of the thermosphere to variations in Joule heating , 2009 .

[3]  G. Crowley,et al.  Periodic modulations in thermospheric composition by solar wind high speed streams , 2008 .

[4]  S. Solomon,et al.  Observations and simulations of quasiperiodic ionospheric oscillations and large‐scale traveling ionospheric disturbances during the December 2006 geomagnetic storm , 2008 .

[5]  R. Steven Nerem,et al.  Rotating solar coronal holes and periodic modulation of the upper atmosphere , 2008 .

[6]  R. Steven Nerem,et al.  Density and Winds in the Thermosphere Deduced from Accelerometer Data , 2007 .

[7]  S. Solomon,et al.  Vertical variations in the N2 mass mixing ratio during a thermospheric storm that have been simulated using a coupled magnetosphere‐ionosphere‐thermosphere model , 2006 .

[8]  R. Nerem,et al.  Thermosphere density response to the 20-21 November 2003 solar and geomagnetic storm from CHAMP and GRACE accelerometer data , 2006 .

[9]  H. Lühr,et al.  Strong disturbance of the upper thermospheric density due to magnetic storms: CHAMP observations , 2005 .

[10]  Larry J. Paxton,et al.  First look at the 20 November 2003 superstorm with TIMED/GUVI: Comparisons with a thermospheric global circulation model , 2005 .

[11]  H. Rishbeth.  Questions of the equatorial F2-layer and thermosphere , 2004 .

[12]  Larry J. Paxton,et al.  O/N2 changes during 1–4 October 2002 storms: IMAGE SI‐13 and TIMED/GUVI observations , 2004 .

[13]  G. W. Prölss.  Physics of the Earth’s Space Environment , 2004 .

[14]  Robert R. Meier,et al.  Initial observations with the Global Ultraviolet Imager (GUVI) in the NASA TIMED satellite mission , 2003 .

[15]  X. Pi,et al.  Case study of the 15 July 2000 magnetic storm effects on the ionosphere-driver of the positive ionospheric storm in the winter hemisphere , 2003 .

[16]  D. Drob,et al.  Nrlmsise-00 Empirical Model of the Atmosphere: Statistical Comparisons and Scientific Issues , 2002 .

[17]  H. Rishbeth,et al.  Vertical circulation and thermospheric composition: a modelling study , 1999 .

[18]  Timothy Fuller-Rowell,et al.  On the seasonal response of the thermosphere and ionosphere to geomagnetic storms , 1996 .

[19]  Larry J. Paxton,et al.  Satellite remote sensing of thermospheric O/N2 and solar EUV: 1. Theory , 1995 .

[20]  Timothy Fuller-Rowell,et al.  Response of the thermosphere and ionosphere to geomagnetic storms , 1994 .

[21]  Raymond G. Roble,et al.  A thermosphere/ionosphere general circulation model with coupled electrodynamics , 1992 .

[22]  T. Killeen,et al.  On the mechanisms responsible for high-latitude thermospheric composition variations during the recovery phase of a geomagnetic storm , 1989 .

[23]  Raymond G. Roble,et al.  A coupled thermosphere/ionosphere general circulation model , 1988 .

[24]  Arthur D. Richmond,et al.  Mapping electrodynamic features of the high-latitude ionosphere from localized observations: technique , 1988 .

[25]  T. Fuller‐Rowell,et al.  Diffusive equilibrium and vertical motion in the thermosphere during a severe magnetic storm : A computational study , 1987 .

[26]  G. W. Prölss.  Magnetic storm associated perturbations of the upper atmosphere: Recent results obtained by satellite‐borne gas analyzers , 1980 .

[27]  N. Spencer,et al.  Some properties of upper atmosphere dynamics , 1978 .

[28]  D. R. Bates.  The thermosphere , 1956, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.