Bilingualism, Language Shift, and Industrialization in Mid-20 th Century India

Economists have linked linguistic heterogeneity to poor economic outcomes, including low economic growth. Linguists have noted that linguistic heterogeneity has been steadily declining for hundreds of years. This paper argues that an important factor behind the consolidation of languages noted by linguists has been the rise of economic activities in which communication is relatively important, such as manufacturing and services. When it is valuable to be able to communicate widely, there is an incentive to become bilingual, particularly for speakers of minority languages. The children of bilinguals may then assimilate to the bigger language, producing consolidation. I use a simple framework to illustrate the relationships between factory employment, bilingualism, and language consolidation. I then explore these relationships empirically using a new panel dataset of Indian districts for 1931 and 1961. My instrumental variables estimates show growth of manufacturing employment strongly encouraged bilingualism in mid-20 th century India, particularly among minority language speakers. Bilingualism among speakers of a language is correlated with its relative decline; instrumental variables estimates show a one standard deviation increase in manufacturing employment decreased linguistic heterogeneity by a third of a standard deviation in Indian districts.

[1]  Richard F. Kuisel,et al.  Peasants into Frenchmen: The Modernization of Rural France, 1870-1914 , 1978 .

[2]  Dennis R. Appleyard The Terms of Trade between the United Kingdom and British India, 1858–1947 , 2006, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[3]  Tirthankar Roy,et al.  Traditional Industry in the Economy of Colonial India , 1999 .

[4]  W. Bright,et al.  Census of India 1961 , 1968 .

[5]  Jeffrey Church,et al.  Bilingualism and Network Externalities , 1993 .

[6]  A. Alesina,et al.  Ethnic Diversity and Economic Performance , 2004 .

[7]  Michael E. Krauss The world's languages in crisis , 2015 .

[8]  S. Sivasubramonian The National Income of India in the Twentieth Century , 2000 .

[9]  E. Lazear Culture and Language , 1995, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  Jane H. Hill Language Death, Language Contact, and Language Evolution , 1978 .

[11]  Lyle Campbell,et al.  Ethnologue: Languages of the world (review) , 2008 .

[12]  J. Stock,et al.  Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments , 1994 .

[13]  A. Alesina,et al.  Public Goods and Ethnic Divisions , 1997 .

[14]  Kevin Lang,et al.  A Language Theory of Discrimination , 1986 .

[15]  Alan L. Olmstead,et al.  Historical Statistics of the United States , 2006 .

[16]  B. Chiswick,et al.  The Endogeneity between Language and Earnings: International Analyses , 1995, Journal of Labor Economics.

[17]  S. Gal,et al.  Language shift: Social determinants of linguistic change in bilingual Austria , 1979 .

[18]  Aimee Chin,et al.  Language Skills and Earnings: Evidence from Childhood Immigrants , 2003, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[19]  J. Hutton,et al.  Census of India, 1931. , 1934 .

[20]  R. Singh,et al.  India administrative atlas 1872-2001 : a historical perspective of evolution of districts and states in India , 2004 .