CT angiography of stented carotid arteries: comparison with Doppler ultrasonography.

PURPOSE To determine whether computed tomographic angiography (CTA) is a feasible modality for assessing stented carotid arteries and whether in-stent restenosis based on CTA concurs with ultrasonography (US). METHODS A retrospective review was conducted of 37 follow-up CTA and US images from 27 patients (23 men; median age 70 years, range 56-77) who received 34 nitinol carotid stents. CTA and US images were compared with respect to assessability and percent stenosis. Both visual estimation (>or=50% or not) and the NASCET method were used to determine percent stenosis in CTA images. For US, a determination of >or=50% stenosis was based on peak systolic velocity (>or=200 cm/s) and an internal carotid artery to common carotid artery ratio >or=2.5. Percent stenosis values by CTA were also compared to values (n=7, 21%) determined by catheter angiography. RESULTS CTA and US images were "totally assessable" in 27 (73%) and 15 (41%), "totally non-assessable" in 0 (0%) and 3 (8%), and "partially assessable" in 10 (27%) and 19 (51%), respectively. Assessability of CTA images was equal to or better than that of US images in 33 (89%). The percent stenoses by CTA and US were comparable in 20 cases. CTA found >or=50% stenosis using the NASCET method in 4 of 20 stents; none of these showed >or=50% stenosis by visual estimation of CTA or by spectral Doppler US. Compared with catheter angiography, CTA overestimated percent stenosis from 34% to 66% (mean 53%). US confirmed 2 angiographically proven restenoses, but CTA identified only 1. CONCLUSION CTA provides better image quality for stented carotid arteries than US, but it might be inferior to US in determining restenosis in assessable cases. Therefore, CTA is likely to be an alternative to US in cases of non-assessability. A large-scale study including more restenosis cases is warranted to reveal which modality is more reliable for diagnosis of restenosis.

[1]  T. Fujii,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of coronary stents in patients by 16-slice computed tomography. , 2006, International journal of cardiology.

[2]  M. Kibbe,et al.  Duplex Ultrasound Remains a Reliable Test Even After Carotid Stenting , 2005, Annals of vascular surgery.

[3]  B. Lewis,et al.  Diagnosis of coronary in-stent restenosis with multidetector row spiral computed tomography. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  S. Furui,et al.  Evaluation of coronary stents in vitro with CT angiography: effect of stent diameter, convolution kernel, and vessel orientation to the z-axis. , 2005, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[5]  F. Selzer,et al.  Determining In-Stent Stenosis of Carotid Arteries by Duplex Ultrasound Criteria , 2005, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[6]  A. Riecker,et al.  Systematic Review of Early Recurrent Stenosis After Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting , 2005, Stroke.

[7]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  Assessment of coronary artery stents using 16-slice MDCT angiography: evaluation of a dedicated reconstruction kernel and a noise reduction filter , 2005, European Radiology.

[8]  T. Bajwa,et al.  Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  K. Bae,et al.  Coronary artery stent patency assessed with in-stent contrast enhancement measured at multi-detector row CT angiography: initial experience. , 2004, Radiology.

[10]  J. D. De Guise,et al.  CT and MR imaging of nitinol stents with radiopaque distal markers. , 2004, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[11]  Rüdiger Blindt,et al.  Coronary Artery Stents in Multislice Computed Tomography: In Vitro Artifact Evaluation , 2004, Investigative radiology.

[12]  B. Lal,et al.  Carotid artery stenting: is there a need to revise ultrasound velocity criteria? , 2004, Journal of vascular surgery.

[13]  S. Ibayashi,et al.  Transoral Carotid Ultrasonography as a Diagnostic Aid in Patients with Severe Carotid Stenosis , 2003, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[14]  S. Mckinlay.  Carotid Revascularization Using Endarterectomy or Stenting Systems (CARESS): Phase I Clinical Trial , 2003 .

[15]  B. Lal,et al.  In-stent recurrent stenosis after carotid artery stenting: life table analysis and clinical relevance. , 2003, Journal of vascular surgery.

[16]  A. Ringer,et al.  Follow-up of Stented Carotid Arteries by Doppler Ultrasound , 2002, Neurosurgery.

[17]  R. Gonzalez,et al.  US of neurovascular occlusive disease: interpretive pearls and pitfalls. , 2002, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[18]  M. Völk,et al.  Appearance of Vascular Stents in Computed Tomographic Angiography: In Vitro Examination of 14 Different Stent Types , 2001, Investigative radiology.

[19]  J. Slattery,et al.  Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) , 1998, The Lancet.

[20]  M. Lockhart,et al.  Carotid artery stents: early and intermediate follow-up with Doppler US. , 1997, Radiology.

[21]  A. Alexandrov,et al.  Correlation of peak systolic velocity and angiographic measurement of carotid stenosis revisited. , 1997, Stroke.

[22]  E. Oddone,et al.  Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. , 1995, JAMA.

[23]  J R Waugh,et al.  Arteriographic complications in the DSA era. , 1992, Radiology.

[24]  D. Sackett,et al.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.