Variety of genotypes in males diagnosed as dichromatic on a conventional clinical anomaloscope

The hypothesis that dichromatic behavior on a clinical anomaloscope can be explained by the complement and arrangement of the long- (L) and middle-wavelength (M) pigment genes was tested. It was predicted that dichromacy is associated with an X-chromosome pigment gene array capable of producing only a single functional pigment type. The simplest case of this is when deletion has left only a single X-chromosome pigment gene. The production of a single L or M pigment type can also result from rearrangements in which multiple genes remain. Often, only the two genes at the 5′ end of the array are expressed; thus, dichromacy is also predicted to occur if one of these is defective or encodes a defective pigment, or if both of them encode pigments with identical spectral sensitivities. Subjects were 128 males who accepted the full range of admixtures of the two primary lights as matching the comparison light on a Neitz or Nagel anomaloscope. Strikingly, examination of the L and M pigment genes revealed a potential cause for a color-vision defect in all 128 dichromats. This indicates that the major component of color-vision deficiency could be attributed to alterations of the pigment genes or their regulatory regions in all cases, and the variety of gene arrangements associated with dichromacy is cataloged here. However, a fraction of the dichromats (17 out of 128; 13%) had genes predicted to encode pigments that would result in two populations of cones with different spectral sensitivities. Nine of the 17 were predicted to have two pigments with slightly different spectral peaks (usually ≤ 2.5 nm) and eight had genes which specified pigments identical in peak absorption, but different in amino acid positions previously associated with optical density differences. In other subjects, reported previously, the same small spectral differences were associated with anomalous trichromacy rather than dichromacy. It appears that when the spectral difference specified by the genes is very small, the amount of residual red–green color vision measured varies; some individuals test as dichromats, others test as anomalous trichromats. The discrepancy is probably partly attributable to testing method differences and partly to a difference in performance not perception, but it seems there must also be cases in which other factors, for example, cone ratio, contribute to a person's ability to extract a color signal from a small spectral difference.

[1]  J. Nathans,et al.  Molecular genetics of human color vision: the genes encoding blue, green, and red pigments. , 1986, Science.

[2]  J. Nathans,et al.  Genetic heterogeneity among blue-cone monochromats. , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[3]  H. Ostrer,et al.  Mutation of a conserved cysteine in the X-linked cone opsins causes color vision deficiencies by disrupting protein folding and stability. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  H. Khorana,et al.  Assembly of functional rhodopsin requires a disulfide bond between cysteine residues 110 and 187. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[5]  John D. Mollon,et al.  Normal and Defective Colour Vision , 2003 .

[6]  J Nathans,et al.  Absorption spectra of the hybrid pigments responsible for anomalous color vision. , 1992, Science.

[7]  Samir S. Deeb,et al.  Position of a 'green-red' hybrid gene in the visual pigment array determines colour-vision phenotype , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[8]  Jay Neitz,et al.  The importance of deleterious mutations of M pigment genes as a cause of color vision defects , 2001 .

[9]  J. Neitz,et al.  Visual Pigment Gene Structure and the Severity of Color Vision Defects , 1996, Science.

[10]  C. M. Davenport,et al.  Molecular genetics of human blue cone monochromacy. , 1989, Science.

[11]  Jay Neitz,et al.  L-cone pigment genes expressed in normal colour vision , 1998, Vision Research.

[12]  Elizabeth Sanocki,et al.  Defective colour vision associated with a missense mutation in the human green visual pigment gene , 1992, Nature Genetics.

[13]  J. Nathans,et al.  Molecular genetics of inherited variation in human color vision. , 1986, Science.

[14]  J Nathans,et al.  ROLE OF HYDROXYL‐BEARING AMINO ACIDS IN DIFFERENTIALLY TUNING THE ABSORPTION SPECTRA OF THE HUMAN RED AND GREEN CONE PIGMENTS , 1993, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[15]  L. Sharpe,et al.  The importance of gene order in expression of the red and green visual pigment genes and in color vision , 2001 .

[16]  Robert Shapley,et al.  Receptive field structure of neurons in monkey primary visual cortex revealed by stimulation with natural image sequences. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[17]  S. Shevell,et al.  Trichromatic color vision with only two spectrally distinct photopigments , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  H. Khorana,et al.  Cysteine residues 110 and 187 are essential for the formation of correct structure in bovine rhodopsin. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Jay Neitz,et al.  Molecular genetic detection of female carriers of protan defects , 1998, Vision Research.

[20]  J. Neitz,et al.  Evaluating the human X-chromosome pigment gene promoter sequences as predictors of L:M cone ratio variation. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[21]  David Williams,et al.  Color Perception Is Mediated by a Plastic Neural Mechanism that Is Adjustable in Adults , 2002, Neuron.

[22]  K. Palczewski,et al.  Crystal Structure of Rhodopsin: A G‐Protein‐Coupled Receptor , 2002, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[23]  Jay Neitz,et al.  A new mass screening test for color-vision deficiencies in children , 2001 .

[24]  Jay Neitz,et al.  Estimates of L:M cone ratio from ERG flicker photometry and genetics. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[25]  Jay Neitz,et al.  Genetic basis of photopigment variations in human dichromats , 1995, Vision Research.

[26]  Y. Nishida,et al.  An A−71C substitution in a green gene at the second position in the red/green visual-pigment gene array is associated with deutan color-vision deficiency , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  J Nathans,et al.  Red, Green, and Red-Green Hybrid Pigments in the Human Retina: Correlations between Deduced Protein Sequences and Psychophysically Measured Spectral Sensitivities , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  D. Oprian,et al.  Molecular determinants of human red/green color discrimination , 1994, Neuron.

[29]  S. Shevell,et al.  Relating color discrimination to photopigment genes in deutan observers , 1998, Vision Research.