The Impact of the Mode of Thought in Complex Decisions: Intuitive Decisions are Better

A number of recent studies have reported that decision quality is enhanced under conditions of inattention or distraction (unconscious thought; Dijksterhuis, 2004; Dijksterhuis and Nordgren, 2006; Dijksterhuis et al., 2006). These reports have generated considerable controversy, for both experimental (problems of replication) and theoretical reasons (interpretation). Here we report the results of four experiments. The first experiment replicates the unconscious thought effect, under conditions that validate and control the subjective criterion of decision quality. The second and third experiments examine the impact of a mode of thought manipulation (without distraction) on decision quality in immediate decisions. Here we find that intuitive or affective manipulations improve decision quality compared to analytic/deliberation manipulations. The fourth experiment combines the two methods (distraction and mode of thought manipulations) and demonstrates enhanced decision quality, in a situation that attempts to preserve ecological validity. The results are interpreted within a framework that is based on two interacting subsystems of decision-making: an affective/intuition based system and an analytic/deliberation system.

[1]  John B. Kidd,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives—Preferences and Value Tradeoffs , 1977 .

[2]  Ilan Vertinsky,et al.  Mood in foreign exchange trading: Cognitive processes and performance , 2003 .

[3]  Davy Lerouge,et al.  Evaluating the benefits of distraction on product evaluations: The mindset effect , 2009 .

[4]  Jaap Ham,et al.  The Merits of Unconscious Processing of Directly and Indirectly Obtained Information About Social Justice , 2010 .

[5]  Mário B. Ferreira,et al.  Automatic and controlled components of judgment and decision making. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  Intuition: a social cognitive neuroscience approach. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  N. Block.  Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  Jrc Jaap Ham,et al.  Lady justice thinks unconsciously : unconscious thought can lead to more accurate justice judgments , 2009 .

[9]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Introspecting about Reasons can Reduce Post-Choice Satisfaction , 1993 .

[10]  B. Franklin,et al.  The Writings Of Benjamin Franklin , 1905 .

[11]  Jonathan Evans.  In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  P. Thagard,et al.  Explanatory coherence , 1993 .

[13]  B. Fasolo,et al.  Decision technology. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[14]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[15]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[16]  S. Epstein.  Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. , 1994, The American psychologist.

[17]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment , 2001, Science.

[18]  A. Tversky.  Intransitivity of preferences. , 1969 .

[19]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[20]  A. Dijksterhuis.  Think different: the merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  Heeseog Kang,et al.  On Making the Right Choice: The Deliberation-Without-Attention Effect , 2006 .

[22]  Joel D. Lieberman,et al.  The effects of rational and experiential information processing of expert testimony in death penalty cases. , 2004, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[23]  A. Damasio,et al.  Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex , 1994, Cognition.

[24]  G Gigerenzer,et al.  Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. , 1996, Psychological review.

[25]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Bidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction , 1999 .

[26]  Sean A. Spence,et al.  Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain , 1995 .

[27]  Todd J. Thorsteinson,et al.  Does unconscious thought outperform conscious thought on complex decisions? A further examination , 2009, Judgment and Decision Making.

[28]  Rick B. van Baaren,et al.  Predicting Soccer Matches After Unconscious and Conscious Thought as a Function of Expertise , 2009, Psychological science.

[29]  Jerome R Busemeyer,et al.  Cognitive modeling analysis of decision-making processes in cocaine abusers , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  Stephen M. Johnson,et al.  The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits , 2000 .

[31]  A. Damasio,et al.  Deciding Advantageously Before Knowing the Advantageous Strategy , 1997, Science.

[32]  Matthew J. Lindberg,et al.  “Save Angels Perhaps”: A Critical Examination of Unconscious Thought Theory and the Deliberation-Without-Attention Effect , 2008 .

[33]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[34]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article The Merits of Unconscious Thought in Creativity , 2022 .

[35]  Tilmann Betsch,et al.  Does Intuition Beat Fast and Frugal Heuristics? A Systematic Empirical Analysis , 2011 .

[36]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Reasoning and the weighting of attributes in attitude judgments , 1996 .

[37]  Antonio Damasio,et al.  The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision , 2005, Games Econ. Behav..

[38]  Felix Acker.  New findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making: additional empirical data and meta-analysis. , 2008, Judgment and Decision Making.

[39]  D. Calvillo,et al.  Are complex decisions better left to the unconscious? Further failed replications of the deliberation-without-attention effect , 2009, Judgment and Decision Making.

[40]  H. Plessner,et al.  PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN Betsch et al. / IMPLICIT ATTITUDE FORMATION I Like It but I Don’t Know Why: A Value-Account Approach to Implicit Attitude Formation , 2022 .

[41]  David R Shanks,et al.  Complex Choices Better Made Unconsciously? , 2006, Science.

[42]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  Evidence-based and intuition-based self-knowledge: an FMRI study. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  Andreas Glöckner.  Does Intuition Beat Fast and Frugal Heuristics? A Systematic Empirical Approach , 2007 .

[44]  Piotr Winkielman,et al.  Subliminal affective priming resists attributional interventions. , 1997 .

[45]  R. Dawes,et al.  Linear models in decision making. , 1974 .

[46]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Effects of introspecting about reasons: inferring attitudes from accessible thoughts. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Intuitive decision making in complex situations: Somatic markers in an artificial grammar learning task , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[48]  Maarten W. Bos,et al.  On the goal-dependency of unconscious thought , 2008 .

[49]  Arnaud Rey,et al.  Does unconscious thought improve complex decision making? , 2009, Psychological research.

[50]  A. Dijksterhuis,et al.  A Theory of Unconscious Thought , 2006, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[51]  Arthur S. Reber,et al.  Cognition Unawares. (Book Reviews: Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge. An Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious.) , 1996 .

[52]  W. Edwards,et al.  MULTIATTRIBUTE EVALUATION , 2003 .

[53]  Andreas Glöckner,et al.  Modeling Option and Strategy Choices with Connectionist Networks: Towards an Integrative Model of Automatic and Deliberate Decision Making , 2008, Judgment and Decision Making.

[54]  L. Fellows.  Deciding how to decide: ventromedial frontal lobe damage affects information acquisition in multi-attribute decision making. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[55]  D. Kumaran,et al.  Frames, Biases, and Rational Decision-Making in the Human Brain , 2006, Science.

[56]  Michel Tuan Pham,et al.  All Negative Moods Are Not Equal: Motivational Influences of Anxiety and Sadness on Decision Making. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[57]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Frames and brains: elicitation and control of response tendencies , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[58]  A. Glöckner,et al.  Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[59]  Rick B. van Baaren,et al.  On Making the Right Choice: The Deliberation-Without-Attention Effect , 2006, Science.

[60]  Jonathan Evans.  Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[61]  Mary Frances Luce,et al.  Boundary Conditions on Unconscious Thought in Complex Decision Making , 2008, Psychological science.

[62]  S. Sloman.  The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[63]  Tim Rakow,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article the Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Think, Blink or Sleep on It? the Impact of Modes of Thought on Complex Decision Making , 2022 .

[64]  D. Kahneman.  A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[65]  A. Bechara,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Neural Correlates of Adaptive Decision Making for Risky Gains and Losses , 2022 .

[66]  N. Pennington,et al.  Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making. , 1992 .

[67]  Eric Raymond Igou,et al.  On undesirable consequences of thinking: Framing effects as a function of substantive processing , 2007 .

[68]  Jane S. Paulsen,et al.  Dissociations within nondeclarative memory in Huntington's disease. , 1996 .

[69]  G. Keren,et al.  Two Is Not Always Better Than One , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.