The revised Tennessee Eastman process simulator as testbed for SPC and DoE methods
暂无分享,去创建一个
Murat Kulahci | Erik Vanhatalo | Francesca Capaci | Bjarne Bergquist | M. Kulahci | B. Bergquist | Erik Vanhatalo | Francesca Capaci
[1] Christos Georgakis,et al. Disturbance detection and isolation by dynamic principal component analysis , 1995 .
[2] James M. Lucas,et al. Factorial Experiments When Factor Levels are Not Necessarily Reset , 2004 .
[3] Zhihuan Song,et al. Retrofit self-optimizing control of Tennessee Eastman process , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT).
[4] E. F. Vogel,et al. A plant-wide industrial process control problem , 1993 .
[5] Tiago J. Rato,et al. Sensitivity enhancing transformations for monitoring the process correlation structure , 2014 .
[6] JayHyung Lee,et al. Nonlinear model predictive control of the Tennessee Eastman challenge process , 1995 .
[7] Tiago J. Rato,et al. Fault detection in the Tennessee Eastman benchmark process using dynamic principal components analysis based on decorrelated residuals (DPCA-DR) , 2013 .
[8] Murat Kulahci,et al. Challenges in multivariate control charts with autocorrelated data , 2006 .
[9] George W. Irwin,et al. Improved principal component monitoring of large-scale processes , 2004 .
[10] Hai Lin,et al. Adaptive sparse principal component analysis for enhanced process monitoring and fault isolation , 2015 .
[11] M. Kulahci,et al. On the structure of dynamic principal component analysis used in statistical process monitoring , 2017 .
[12] Furong Gao,et al. Review of Recent Research on Data-Based Process Monitoring , 2013 .
[13] Ron S. Kenett,et al. A structured overview on the use of computational simulators for teaching statistical methods , 2017 .
[14] Kerstin Vännman,et al. Towards Improved Analysis Methods for Two‐Level Factorial Experiments with Time Series Responses , 2013, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..
[15] G. Box,et al. On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions , 1951 .
[16] Christos Georgakis,et al. Plant-wide control of the Tennessee Eastman problem , 1995 .
[17] Jack R. Meredith,et al. An Empirical Analysis of Process Industry Transformation Systems , 2000 .
[18] Gibaek Lee,et al. Multiple-Fault Diagnosis of the Tennessee Eastman Process Based on System Decomposition and Dynamic PLS , 2004 .
[19] George E. P. Box,et al. Evolutionary Operation: a Method for Increasing Industrial Productivity , 1957 .
[20] Alberto Ferrer,et al. Latent Structures-Based Multivariate Statistical Process Control: A Paradigm Shift , 2014 .
[21] Erik Vanhatalo,et al. Special Considerations when Planning Experiments in a Continuous Process , 2007 .
[22] Murat Kulahci,et al. Quality Quandaries: The Effect of Autocorrelation on Statistical Process Control Procedures , 2005 .
[23] Murat Kulahci,et al. The Effect of Autocorrelation on the Hotelling T2 Control Chart , 2015, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..
[24] Mohieddine Jelali,et al. Revision of the Tennessee Eastman Process Model , 2015 .
[25] Chun-Chin Hsu,et al. A novel process monitoring approach with dynamic independent component analysis , 2010 .
[26] Tiago J. Rato,et al. On-line process monitoring using local measures of association: Part I — Detection performance , 2015 .
[27] Erik Vanhatalo,et al. Identifying Process Dynamics through a Two-Level Factorial Experiment , 2014 .
[28] Murat Kulahci,et al. Exploring the Use of Design of Experiments in Industrial Processes Operating Under Closed‐Loop Control , 2017, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..
[29] Alberto Trombetta,et al. BPMN: An introduction to the standard , 2012, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.
[30] Murat Kulahci,et al. Recent Advances and Future Directions for Quality Engineering , 2016, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..
[31] Kerstin Vännman,et al. A Method to Determine Transition Time for Experiments in Dynamic Processes , 2009 .
[32] N. Lawrence Ricker,et al. Decentralized control of the Tennessee Eastman Challenge Process , 1996 .