A frequency importance function for a new monosyllabic word test

This is a publisher’s version of an article published in Australian Journal of Audiology 1989. This version is reproduced with permission from the publisher, Australian Academic Press. http://www.australianacademicpress.com.au/

[1]  C. P. Janota,et al.  Frequency importance functions for words, sentences, and continuous discourse. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[2]  Harvey Dillon,et al.  Prediction of Speech Recognition From Audibility and Psychoacoustic Abilities of Hearing-Impaired Listeners , 2019, Modeling Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

[3]  M W Skinner,et al.  Amplification bandwidth and intelligibility of speech in quiet and noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1983, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[4]  C V Pavlovic,et al.  Derivation of primary parameters and procedures for use in speech intelligibility predictions. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  D D Dirks,et al.  Articulation index predictions of contextually dependent words. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  C Ludvigsen.  Prediction of speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and cochlearly hearing-impaired listeners. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  J. C. Steinberg,et al.  Factors Governing the Intelligibility of Speech Sounds , 1945 .

[8]  D D Dirks,et al.  Application of the Articulation Index and the Speech Transmission Index to the recognition of speech by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[9]  C V Pavlovic,et al.  Frequency importance functions for a feature recognition test material. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  G A Studebaker,et al.  Frequency-importance and transfer functions for the Auditec of St. Louis recordings of the NU-6 word test. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[11]  M W Skinner,et al.  Amplification bandwidth and speech intelligibility for two listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1982, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[12]  C V Pavlovic.  Use of the articulation index for assessing residual auditory function in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  D. Schum,et al.  Actual and predicted word-recognition performance of elderly hearing-impaired listeners. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[14]  C V Pavlovic,et al.  An articulation index based procedure for predicting the speech recognition performance of hearing-impaired individuals. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  D D Dirks,et al.  Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  G A Studebaker,et al.  Frequency-importance and transfer functions for recorded CID W-22 word lists. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[17]  C V Pavlovic,et al.  A frequency importance function for continuous discourse. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  D D Dirks,et al.  Speech recognition and the Articulation Index for normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. , 1962, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[20]  D D Dirks,et al.  Frequency-importance functions for words in high- and low-context sentences. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.