The Effect of Stereoscopic Augmented Reality Visualization on Learning Anatomy and the Modifying Effect of Visual‐Spatial Abilities: A Double‐Center Randomized Controlled Trial

Monoscopically projected three‐dimensional (3D) visualization technology may have significant disadvantages for students with lower visual‐spatial abilities despite its overall effectiveness in teaching anatomy. Previous research suggests that stereopsis may facilitate a better comprehension of anatomical knowledge. This study evaluated the educational effectiveness of stereoscopic augmented reality (AR) visualization and the modifying effect of visual‐spatial abilities on learning. In a double‐center randomized controlled trial, first‐ and second‐year (bio)medical undergraduates studied lower limb anatomy with stereoscopic 3D AR model (n = 20), monoscopic 3D desktop model (n = 20), or two‐dimensional (2D) anatomical atlas (n = 18). Visual‐spatial abilities were tested with Mental Rotation Test (MRT), Paper Folding Test (PFT), and Mechanical Reasoning (MR) Test. Anatomical knowledge was assessed by the validated 30‐item paper posttest. The overall posttest scores in the stereoscopic 3D AR group (47.8%) were similar to those in the monoscopic 3D desktop group (38.5%; P = 0.240) and the 2D anatomical atlas group (50.9%; P = 1.00). When stratified by visual‐spatial abilities test scores, students with lower MRT scores achieved higher posttest scores in the stereoscopic 3D AR group (49.2%) as compared to the monoscopic 3D desktop group (33.4%; P = 0.015) and similar to the scores in the 2D group (46.4%; P = 0.99). Participants with higher MRT scores performed equally well in all conditions. It is instrumental to consider an aptitude–treatment interaction caused by visual‐spatial abilities when designing research into 3D learning. Further research is needed to identify contributing features and the most effective way of introducing this technology into current educational programs.

[1]  Thomas Huk,et al.  Who benefits from learning with 3D models? the case of spatial ability , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[2]  T. Karachalios,et al.  Anatomy Learning from Prosected Cadaveric Specimens Versus Plastic Models: A Comparative Study of Upper Limb Anatomy , 2020, Anatomical sciences education.

[3]  Esther M. Bergman,et al.  How much anatomy is enough? , 2008, Anatomical sciences education.

[4]  Steve Reid,et al.  How Haptics and Drawing Enhance the Learning of Anatomy , 2018, Anatomical sciences education.

[5]  Victoria A Roach,et al.  Different perspectives: Spatial ability influences where individuals look on a timed spatial test , 2017, Anatomical sciences education.

[6]  D. Cook.  The Research We Still Are Not Doing: An Agenda for the Study of Computer-Based Learning , 2005, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[7]  Piet Kommers,et al.  The role of stereopsis in virtual anatomical learning , 2008, Interact. Comput..

[8]  Geoff Norman,et al.  Learning anatomy: do new computer models improve spatial understanding? , 1999 .

[9]  Alfred Bork,et al.  Multimedia in Learning , 2001 .

[10]  Aymeric Guillot,et al.  Relationship Between Spatial Abilities, Mental Rotation and Functional Anatomy Learning , 2007, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[11]  Samy A. Azer,et al.  Do we need dissection in an integrated problem-based learning medical course? Perceptions of first- and second-year students , 2007, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[12]  Graham M Fraser,et al.  Guiding Low Spatial Ability Individuals through Visual Cueing: The Dual Importance of Where and When to Look , 2019, Anatomical sciences education.

[13]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Representation of the perceived 3-D object shape in the human lateral occipital complex. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  Roberta L Klatzky,et al.  Haptic object perception: spatial dimensionality and relation to vision , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Evaluation of the effectiveness of 3D vascular stereoscopic models in anatomy instruction for first year medical students , 2017, Anatomical sciences education.

[16]  K. Malizos,et al.  Anatomy learning from prosected cadaveric specimens versus three-dimensional software: A comparative study of upper limb anatomy. , 2018, Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft.

[17]  Claudio Violato,et al.  A meta‐analysis of the educational effectiveness of three‐dimensional visualization technologies in teaching anatomy , 2015, Anatomical sciences education.

[18]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[19]  Graham M Fraser,et al.  Time limits in testing: An analysis of eye movements and visual attention in spatial problem solving , 2017, Anatomical sciences education.

[20]  Bruce Wainman,et al.  The superiority of three‐dimensional physical models to two‐dimensional computer presentations in anatomy learning , 2018, Medical education.

[21]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Expertise, Spatial Ability and Intuition in the Use of Complex Visual Displays , 2007 .

[22]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[23]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain? , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  J. Stanley,et al.  Book Review: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain , 1957 .

[25]  M. Proctor,et al.  The effect of autostereoscopic holograms on anatomical knowledge: a randomised trial , 2018, Medical education.

[26]  J. Kooloos,et al.  Stereopsis, Visuospatial Ability, and Virtual Reality in Anatomy Learning , 2017, Anatomy research international.

[27]  David A Cook,et al.  Reflections on experimental research in medical education , 2010, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[28]  W. Pawlina,et al.  Medical education in the anatomical sciences: The winds of change continue to blow , 2009, Anatomical sciences education.

[29]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning , 2021, The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning.

[30]  Anique B. H. de Bruin,et al.  Students’ perceptions of anatomy across the undergraduate problem-based learning medical curriculum: a phenomenographical study , 2013, BMC medical education.

[31]  J. Vandenbroucke,et al.  Effect modification, interaction and mediation: an overview of theoretical insights for clinical investigators , 2017, Clinical epidemiology.

[32]  Piet Kommers,et al.  Optimizing conditions for computer-assisted anatomical learning , 2006, Interact. Comput..

[33]  C. Moro,et al.  The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy , 2017, Anatomical sciences education.

[34]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Getting a Handle on Learning Anatomy with Interactive Three-Dimensional Graphics , 2009 .

[35]  Kevin W Eva,et al.  Is There Any Real Virtue of Virtual Reality?: The Minor Role of Multiple Orientations in Learning Anatomy from Computers , 2002, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[36]  M. Hegarty.  Components of Spatial Intelligence , 2010 .

[37]  B. Kuehn,et al.  Virtual and Augmented Reality Put a Twist on Medical Education. , 2018, JAMA.

[38]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  Identification of disoriented objects: effects of context of prior presentation. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[39]  H. Harman,et al.  Kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests , 1976 .

[40]  Sevda Küçük,et al.  Learning anatomy via mobile augmented reality: Effects on achievement and cognitive load , 2016, Anatomical sciences education.

[41]  J. Biggs.  Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment , 1996 .

[42]  B. Wainman,et al.  The relative effectiveness of computer‐based and traditional resources for education in anatomy , 2013, Anatomical sciences education.

[43]  Michael K. Southworth,et al.  Development of a Mixed Reality Platform for Lateral Skull Base Anatomy. , 2018, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[44]  Geoffrey H. Sperber,et al.  Clinically Oriented Anatomy , 2006 .

[45]  H. van Mameren,et al.  Do students have sufficient knowledge of clinical anatomy? , 2005, Medical education.

[46]  S. Vandenberg,et al.  Mental Rotations, a Group Test of Three-Dimensional Spatial Visualization , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.

[47]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Enhancement of Anatomical Education Using Augmented Reality: An Empirical Study of Body Painting , 2019, Anatomical sciences education.

[48]  C. Oliver,et al.  The carpal bones: a basic test of medical students' and junior doctors' knowledge of anatomy. , 2005, The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland.

[49]  Peter Janssen,et al.  Binocular depth processing in the ventral visual pathway , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[50]  S. Black,et al.  Anatomy in Scotland: 20 Years of Change , 2005, Scottish medical journal.

[51]  George Mather,et al.  Foundations of Perception , 2006 .

[52]  M. Stuart,et al.  Survey of clinicians' attitudes to the anatomical teaching and knowledge of medical students , 2005, Clinical anatomy.

[53]  M. Graffar.  [Modern epidemiology]. , 1971, Bruxelles medical.

[54]  F. Naaz.  Learning from graphically integrated 2D and 3D representations improves retention of neuroanatomy. , 2012 .

[55]  M. Peters,et al.  A Redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse Mental Rotations Test - Different Versions and Factors That Affect Performance , 1995, Brain and Cognition.

[56]  G. Norman,et al.  Virtual reality and brain anatomy: a randomised trial of e‐learning instructional designs , 2007, Medical education.

[57]  Masahiro Toyoura,et al.  The Use of Augmented Reality Technology in Medical Specimen Museum Tours , 2018, Anatomical sciences education.

[58]  P. McKeown,et al.  The impact of curricular change on medical students' knowledge of anatomy , 2003, Medical education.

[59]  Jean Langlois,et al.  Spatial abilities and anatomy knowledge assessment: A systematic review , 2017, Anatomical sciences education.

[60]  J. Kooloos,et al.  Neuroanatomy Learning: Augmented Reality vs. Cross‐Sections , 2019, Anatomical sciences education.

[61]  G R Norman,et al.  Do virtual computer models hinder anatomy learning? , 1999, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.