Without inclusion, diversity initiatives may not be enough

Focus on minority experiences in STEM, not just numbers Diversity among scientists can foster better science (1, 2), yet engaging and retaining a diversity of students and researchers in science has been difficult (3). Actions that promote diversity are well defined (4), organizations are increasingly focused on diversity (5), and many institutions are developing initiatives to recruit and enroll students from underrepresented minority (URM) groups (racial, ethnic, gender, sexual identity, or persons with disabilities). Yet representation of URM groups in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields lag behind demographics in society at large (3–5), and many URM students feel unwelcome in academic departments and in scientific fields. Why is progress so limited (6, 7)? We see a widespread and under-acknowledged disconnect between initiatives aimed at increasing diversity in academic and professional institutions and the experience of URM students (including many of us authors) (6, 7). We argue that failure to grasp foundations of this disconnect is the crux of why diversity initiatives fail to reach the students that they were made to recruit. We believe that addressing this will resonate with other individuals and groups and help advance discussion in the scientific community.

[1]  George Campbell,et al.  Access Denied: Race, Ethnicity, and the Scientific Enterprise. , 2000 .

[2]  I. D. Clifton,et al.  Access Denied: Race, Ethnicity, and the Scientific Enterprise , 2002 .

[3]  Jan M. Kriegl,et al.  Structural, dynamic, and energetic aspects of long-range electron transfer in photosynthetic reaction centers , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Alexandra Kalev,et al.  Best Practices or Best Guesses? Assessing the Efficacy of Corporate Affirmative Action and Diversity Policies , 2006 .

[5]  Understanding why underrepresented students pursue ecology careers: a preliminary case study , 2007 .

[6]  L. Cortina,et al.  Unseen Injustice: Incivility as Modern Discrimination in Organizations , 2008 .

[7]  Araceli Espinoza,et al.  Examining the Academic Success of Latino Students in Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Majors , 2008 .

[8]  D. Meyer,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S6 References Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups , 2022 .

[9]  D. W. Sue.  Microaggressions in Everyday Life: Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation , 2010 .

[10]  Joshua A. Price.  The effect of instructor race and gender on student persistence in STEM fields , 2010 .

[11]  Lorelle L. Espinosa,et al.  Inside the Double Bind: A Synthesis of Empirical Research on Undergraduate and Graduate Women of Color in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics , 2011 .

[12]  C. Steele.  Whistling Vivaldi: How Stereotypes Affect Us and What We Can Do , 2011 .

[13]  M. Graham,et al.  Scientific Diversity Interventions , 2014, Science.

[14]  Daniel M. Kammen,et al.  Stakeholders in climate science: Beyond lip service? , 2015, Science.

[15]  Erica S. Weisgram,et al.  New Routes to Recruiting and Retaining Women in STEM: Policy Implications of a Communal Goal Congruity Perspective , 2015 .

[16]  Freeman A. Hrabowski,et al.  Outcomes and Processes in the Meyerhoff Scholars Program: STEM PhD Completion, Sense of Community, Perceived Program Benefit, Science Identity, and Research Self-Efficacy , 2016, CBE life sciences education.

[17]  Brooke E. Penaluna,et al.  Examining Diversity Inequities in Fisheries Science: A Call to Action , 2016 .

[18]  An open toolkit for tracking open science partnership implementation and impact , 2019, Gates Open Research.