Secrecy performance analysis of AF relaying with relay selection scheme over Nakagami-m fading channels

Int J Commun Syst. 2018;e3738. https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.3738 Summary This paper investigates the secrecy outage probability (SOP) and intercept behavior for the amplify‐and‐forward network over Nakagami‐m fading channels. Relay selection schemes are evaluated. The optimal and suboptimal criterions require the instantaneous and statistical channel state information of the eavesdroppers' channels, respectively. The enhanced 2‐hop criterion needs the additional information of the target secrecy rate for relay selection. Theoretical analysis reveals that the diversity order of the SOP is dominated by the minimum fading figures of the source‐relay and relay‐destination channels, while that of the intercept probability depends on the fading figure of the relay‐destination channel. In the multirelay scenario, the optimal, suboptimal, and enhanced 2‐hop scheme achieve the same diversity orders of the SOP. For the intercept probability, the optimal and second‐hop relay selection schemes provide the same diversity order, while the diversity orders of the suboptimal and enhanced 2‐hop schemes are the same. Simulation results finally substantiate the accuracy of the theoretical analysis.

[1]  Mostafa Kaveh,et al.  Exact symbol error probability of a Cooperative network in a Rayleigh-fading environment , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[2]  Aydin Behnad,et al.  Accuracy of Harmonic Mean Approximation in Performance Analysis of Multihop Amplify-and-Forward Relaying , 2014, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[3]  Mikael Skoglund,et al.  Outage performances for amplify-and-forward, decode-and-forward and cooperative jamming strategies for the wiretap channel , 2011, 2011 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[4]  Mérouane Debbah,et al.  Relay Selection Schemes for Dual-Hop Networks under Security Constraints with Multiple Eavesdroppers , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[5]  Gregory W. Wornell,et al.  Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: Efficient protocols and outage behavior , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[6]  George K. Karagiannidis,et al.  Secure Multiple Amplify-and-Forward Relaying With Cochannel Interference , 2016, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[7]  I. S. Gradshteyn,et al.  Table of Integrals, Series, and Products , 1976 .

[8]  Xianbin Wang,et al.  Optimal Relay Selection for Physical-Layer Security in Cooperative Wireless Networks , 2013, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[9]  Tiecheng Song,et al.  Relay selection for secrecy improvement in cognitive amplify-and-forward relay networks against multiple eavesdroppers , 2016, IET Commun..

[10]  Tran Trung Duy,et al.  Relay Selection for Security Enhancement in Cognitive Relay Networks , 2015, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[11]  Rose Qingyang Hu,et al.  Secure communications in multiple amplify‐and‐forward relay networks with outdated channel state information , 2016, Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol..

[12]  Yu-Cheng He,et al.  Secrecy Performance Analysis of Cognitive Decode-and-Forward Relay Networks in Nakagami- $m$ Fading Channels , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[13]  Gongpu Wang,et al.  Intercept Behavior Analysis of Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks in the Presence of Eavesdropping Attack , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[14]  Danda B. Rawat,et al.  Evaluating Secrecy Outage of Physical Layer Security in Large-Scale MIMO Wireless Communications for Cyber-Physical Systems , 2017, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[15]  Chinmoy Kundu,et al.  Secrecy Outage of Dual-Hop AF Relay System With Relay Selection Without Eavesdropper's CSI , 2014, IEEE Communications Letters.

[16]  Ranjan K. Mallik,et al.  Physical Layer Security of a Multiantenna-Based CR Network With Single and Multiple Primary Users , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[17]  Hyung Yun Kong,et al.  Physical layer security over Dual-Hop Asymmetric Fading Channels , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Communications (ATC 2014).

[18]  George K. Karagiannidis,et al.  Secure Multiuser Communications in Multiple Amplify-and-Forward Relay Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[19]  Xuelong Li,et al.  Secrecy Outage and Diversity Analysis of Cognitive Radio Systems , 2014, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[20]  Kyu-Sung Hwang Performance Analysis of Secrecy Outage Probability for AF-Based Partial Relay Selection with Outdated Channel Estimates , 2017, Mob. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Kiseon Kim,et al.  Secrecy Outage Probability of Optimal Relay Selection for Secure AnF Cooperative Networks , 2015, IEEE Communications Letters.

[22]  Ioannis Krikidis,et al.  Opportunistic relay selection for cooperative networks with secrecy constraints , 2010, IET Commun..