The use of high-resolution imagery for identification of urban climax forest species using traditional and rule-based classification approach

Columbia, Missouri, is one of the fastest growing cities in the United States. The rapid urbanization is jeopardizing the city's urban climax forests, which are defined as any woodland community of more than 7.53 ha dominated by plant species such as oak and hickory. The increasing urban pressure places heavy demands on city planners to seek better management approaches to ensure that these plant species, which are native to Missouri, are protected even when threatened by new developments. Traditionally, planners are identifying these areas by surveys, which are costly, time consuming, and conducted on an as-needed basis. The current study is to test the feasibility of high-resolution satellite and airborne imagery for the identification of these forests and to assist planners in preserving them. In order to identify these climax forests, 4-m multispectral IKONOS images for April and August 2000 and 25-cm and 1-m multispectral airborne photographs for September and November 2001 were acquired and used in this study. These images were classified using a traditional classifier [maximum likelihood (ML)] and a rule-based classifier [classification and regression tree (CART)]. Results show that the images taken in September using the ML classifier are more useful in identifying the tree species in the study area. Among the spatial resolutions used, 1-m images proved to be optimal in recognizing trees and at the same time minimizing shadows.

[1]  M. Lewis,et al.  Species composition related to spectral classification in an Australian spinifex hummock grassland , 1994 .

[2]  G. Hill,et al.  Vegetation mapping of a tropical freshwater swamp in the Northern Territory, Australia: A comparison of aerial photography, Landsat TM and SPOT satellite imagery , 2001 .

[3]  B. S. Manjunath,et al.  Multisensor Image Fusion Using the Wavelet Transform , 1995, CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process..

[4]  Mary Ann Fajvan,et al.  A Comparison of Multispectral and Multitemporal Information in High Spatial Resolution Imagery for Classification of Individual Tree Species in a Temperate Hardwood Forest , 2001 .

[5]  Harini Nagendra,et al.  Using remote sensing to assess biodiversity , 2001 .

[6]  P. Meyera,et al.  Semi-automated procedures for tree species identification in high spatial resolution data from digitized colour infrared-aerial photography , 1996 .

[7]  R. Jackson,et al.  Spectral response of a plant canopy with different soil backgrounds , 1985 .

[8]  Elijah W. Ramsey,et al.  Mapping Chinese Tallow with Color-Infrared Photography , 2002 .

[9]  R. Lawrence Rule-Based Classification Systems Using Classification and Regression Tree (CART) Analysis , 2001 .

[10]  David G. Goodenough,et al.  Comparison of fixed-size and variable-sized windows for the estimation of tree crown position , 1998, IGARSS '98. Sensing and Managing the Environment. 1998 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing. Symposium Proceedings. (Cat. No.98CH36174).

[12]  V. Judson Harward,et al.  Mapping forest vegetation using landsat TM imagery and a canopy reflectance model , 1994 .

[13]  Gregory S. Biging,et al.  A Test of Airborne Multispectral Videography for Assessing the Accuracy of Wildlife Habitat Maps , 1995 .

[14]  A. Skidmore An expert system classifies eucalypt forest types using thematic mapper data and a digital terrain model , 1989 .

[15]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[16]  Valérie Demarez,et al.  Seasonal variation of leaf chlorophyll content of a temperate forest. Inversion of the PROSPECT model , 1999 .

[17]  François A. Gougeon,et al.  RECOGNIZING THE FOREST FROM THE TREES: INDIVIDUAL TREE CROWN DELINEATION, CLASSIFICATION AND REGROUPING FOR INVENTORY PURPOSES* , 1997 .

[18]  George Alan Blackburn,et al.  Seasonal variations in the spectral reflectance of deciduous tree canopies , 1995 .

[19]  J. Townshend,et al.  Global land cover classifications at 8 km spatial resolution: The use of training data derived from Landsat imagery in decision tree classifiers , 1998 .

[20]  Arun K. Saraf IRS-1C-LISS-III and PAN data fusion: An approach to improve remote sensing based mapping techniques , 1999 .

[21]  Jim. Vrabel,et al.  Multispectral imagery band sharpening study , 1996 .

[22]  Gregory S. Biging,et al.  Modeling conifer tree crown radius and estimating canopy cover , 2000 .

[23]  D. Roberts,et al.  Green vegetation, nonphotosynthetic vegetation, and soils in AVIRIS data , 1993 .

[24]  Ramakrishna R. Nemani,et al.  Implementation of a hierarchical global vegetation classification in ecosystem function models , 1996 .

[25]  R. Hall,et al.  Hierarchical image classification and extraction of forest species composition and crown closure from airborne multispectral images , 1998 .

[26]  Y. Inoue,et al.  A simplified method for remote sensing of daily canopy transpiration - a case study with direct measurements of canopy transpiration in soybean canopies , 1997 .

[27]  T. Prato,et al.  Improved urban land cover mapping using multi-temporal IKONOS images for local government planning , 2002 .

[28]  F. Gougeon Towards semi-automatic forest inventories using individual tree crown (ITC) recognition. , 2000 .

[29]  W. Cohen,et al.  Semivariograms of digital imagery for analysis of conifer canopy structure. , 1990 .

[30]  P. S. Chavez,et al.  Comparison of the spectral information content of Landsat Thematic Mapper and SPOT for three different sites in the Phoenix, Arizona region , 1988 .